»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
The Year of Affordable Healthcare Brings Together San Francisco Community Groups to Tackle Healthcare Crisis
May 31st, 2009 by TopDollar

The Year of Affordable Healthcare Brings Together San Francisco Community Groups to Tackle Healthcare Crisis

Local Roundtable First in a Series of Community Discussions on Improving Access to More Affordable Healthcare and Medicine

SAN FRANCISCO, May 28 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, the leading generic pharmaceutical company, today held the first in a series of community roundtables as part of their Year of Affordable Healthcare campaign (www.yearofaffordablehealth.com). The event, held at the YMCA San Francisco, aimed at raising awareness of the need for access to more affordable healthcare and medicine for Americans nationwide. In attendance were a wide-range of community organizers, thought leaders, government officials, and members of the San Francisco community.

San Francisco City & County Supervisor Sean R. Elsbernd opened the event with remarks stressing the importance of programs in the city, like Healthy San Francisco and the work conducted by the Health Service System.

The forum was moderated by Pamela Gilbert, Partner at Cuneo Gilbert & LaDuca and former Executive Director of the Consumer Product Safety Commission and featured Janhavi Bonville of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Jeff Schindler of the Haight Ashbury Free Clinic, Erin Reedy of the YMCA San Francisco, and Doreen King-Roberts, the Community Convener for the Neighborhoods West of Twin Peaks. Topics of discussion included universal healthcare, rising costs in California, state healthcare reform needs, and the cost saving potential of biogenerics.

“With healthcare costs skyrocketing in the state of California, now it is more important than ever to bring together communities to discuss innovative solutions to this crisis that affects every American,” said Pamela Gilbert.

Today’s event is part of a larger drive by the Year of Affordable Healthcare to raise awareness of the need for more affordable healthcare and medicine for Americans. Subsequent community roundtables will be hosted by the Year of Affordable Healthcare this summer in both Chicago, Illinois and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

About the Year of Affordable Healthcare

The Year of Affordable Healthcare campaign (www.yearofaffordablehealth.com) is a nationwide call for increased access to affordable healthcare for American citizens. The program coincides with the 25th anniversary of the landmark Hatch-Waxman Act, which created the modern generic pharmaceutical industry and has saved billions of healthcare dollars.

About Teva USA

Teva USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., one of the largest generic pharmaceutical companies in the world and among the top 20 pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE Teva Pharmaceuticals USA

Apple Vacations Announces ‘Ask an Agent’
May 31st, 2009 by TopDollar

Apple Vacations Announces ‘Ask an Agent’

With its “Ask an Agent” consumer awareness campaign, wholesaler Apple Vacations is reminding would-be vacationers to turn to their professional travel agent first for expert advice. (PRNewsFoto/Apple Vacations)

ELK GROVE VILLAGE, IL UNITED STATES

Reminds consumers to leave the planning to a professional travel agent

ELK GROVE VILLAGE, Ill., May 28 /PRNewswire/ — Consumers are more inundated than ever with vacation offers in pop-up ads, email blasts and seemingly too-good-to-be-true package prices. How can an educated customer be expected to cut through the clutter to find the perfect vacation? With its “Ask an Agent” consumer awareness campaign, Apple Vacations is reminding would-be vacationers to turn to their professional travel agent first for expert advice.

(Logo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20090528/CG24130LOGO)

Apple Vacations unveiled the campaign in May in its newspaper ads and radio commercials. The company is subsidizing customized advertising campaigns with qualifying travel agencies and providing marketing materials for travel agents to create their own local campaigns.

“This campaign sends a powerful message about the value travel agents provide to vacationing consumers in professional travel planning, guidance, service, trust, convenience and consumer advocacy,” said John Werner, president of MAST travel network, the Midwest’s premiere travel agency consortium.

Part-personal shopper and part-psychiatrist, a good travel agent should be able to match up options from thousands of travel deals with their client’s personality.

“Using a professional travel agent is a very convenient and even money-saving method of making travel arrangements. Many agents can find travel bargains that the average web-surfing traveler may not be aware of,” said Steve J. Bernas, president and CEO of the Better Business Bureau of Chicago and Northern Illinois. “Before using any business or signing a contract, we encourage consumers to check out the company for trustworthiness on the BBB Web site at www.bbb.org.”

Why choose to book a vacation through a professional travel agent? Why not?

* Convenience-With so many travel offers, planning your next vacation can be overwhelming and stressful. A professional travel agent can help you focus on the destinations and hotels that best match your needs and preferences.
* First Hand Experience-Chances are good that your travel agent has experienced the resort first-hand or has received personal feedback from those who have. With so many outdated websites with misleading information, the expert advice and personal recommendation of a travel professional is far more reliable than a brochure or web posting.
* Interpret the Fine Print- Professional travel agents are familiar with the disclaimers and hidden fees that could cost you far more than you bargained for. They’ll provide expert advice on everything from optional resort excursions to the real value of travel insurance.
* Best Price- By sifting through the web or making countless phone calls to hotels and airlines, you may be able to find a lower price on your own. But it’s far more likely that a travel agent will find you the best value, and you can avoid making a decision that may cost you dearly. When you book a vacation, you’re investing not only hard-earned dollars but valuable vacation time. It pays to get it right.
* Clout- With a travel agent, you have someone who will go to bat for you should the unexpected happen. Experienced travel agents have long-standing relationships with travel suppliers. They have the right contacts and know how to get things done in the most efficient and timely manner.

About Apple Vacations: For 40 years, Apple Vacations, America’s Favorite Vacation Company, has worked hand in hand with professional travel agents to provide affordable, top quality vacation packages from U.S. departure cities nationwide to vacation destinations throughout Mexico, the Caribbean, Hawaii and Europe, as well as ski resorts in the US and Canada. With the support of travel agents, Apple Vacations has delivered more passengers to Mexico and the Dominican Republic than any other North American tour operator. Apple Vacations is consistently voted “Best Tour Operator to Mexico” as well as “Best Tour Operator to the Caribbean” by readers of the leading travel trade magazines. All vacation options described above include round-trip airfare from select US departure cities, all meals, unlimited drinks, activities, entertainment and more (taxes and fees additional, $87-138.60 per person). For more information visit www.applevacations.com.

SOURCE Apple Vacations

PaidContent to Name the ‘Fresh Faces in Tech: 10 Kid Entrepreneurs to Watch’ on June 1st
May 31st, 2009 by TopDollar

PaidContent to Name the ‘Fresh Faces in Tech: 10 Kid Entrepreneurs to Watch’ on June 1st

Also: A Look Back at Previous Wunderkind Entrepreneurs

Immediately following EconAffinity * Monday, June 1 * 5:30 – 8:30 PM

NEW YORK, May 28 /PRNewswire/ — What do you get when you cross driven teenage entrepreneurs with the biggest shift in media and technology in a generation? PaidContent’s inaugural “Fresh Faces in Tech: 10 Kid Entrepreneurs to Watch.”

Looking for the next Bill Gates? Steve Jobs? Michael Dell? You just might discover their names on June 1st at the ContentNext Media Mixer immediately following EconAffinity: Capitalizing on User Engagement at The Edison Ballroom in New York.

None have reached legal drinking age. There’s even a 15-year-old. Some are already bringing in millions of dollars in revenue.

From mobile platforms to social networks to user-generated content. It’s all here, and then some.

Also that day, PaidContent looks back at top tech entrepreneurs from previous decades, revealing new insights into that period between getting the big idea and launching a viable company.

You don’t want to miss this.

WHEN:       Monday, June 1st, 5:30 – 8:30 PM

WHERE:      The Edison Ballroom, New York, NY

Immediately following EconAffinity: Capitalizing on User
Engagement.

Information and registration at
http://www.contentnext.com/nycmixer/

WHY:        Can you really afford to miss this?

Media contacts:

Jen Harris or Sharon Oh | Brainerd Communicators | (212) 986-6667 | jharris@braincomm.com or oh@braincomm.com

SOURCE ContentNext Media

Pizza Hut(R) P’Zone(R) Asks ‘Are You Hot or Not?’
May 31st, 2009 by TopDollar

Pizza Hut(R) P’Zone(R) Asks ‘Are You Hot or Not?’

Warm up to the Loaded $5 P’Zone and Put Cold Subs on Ice

DALLAS, May 28 /PRNewswire/ — Americans are giving the cold shoulder to cold sandwiches; the $5 Pepperoni P’Zone(R) pizza from Pizza Hut(R) has everyone hot for more than a pound of steamy, delicious food at a great price. For $5, would you rather have a hot and tasty meal with great pizza taste or a cold sandwich? We thought so.

Weighing more than a pound, the P’Zone pizza is filled with your favorite Pizza Hut toppings in three different recipes that are sure to satisfy every aching hunger. Your choice of Meaty, Classic or Pepperoni fillings with cheese are folded into a pizza crust and freshly-baked. The P’Zone is like having a whole pizza that you can pick up and enjoy!

A pound of food never tasted so good for so little. Consider some of your options for a meal that will leave you full and satisfied without busting your wallet. Forget about burgers. Four quarter-pound burgers would cost you at least $10, hardly the most economical way to get some taste bang for your buck when compared to the P’Zone.

The hardest part about ordering the P’Zone is deciding which of the three varieties to choose. Options include:

* Classic P’Zone: Filled with cheese, Italian sausage, green peppers and red onions, the Classic P’Zone is filled with more than one pound of pizza goodness
* Meaty P’Zone: This P’Zone really lives up to its mouth watering name, packed with cheese, pepperoni, ham, Italian sausage, and seasoned beef
* Pepperoni P’Zone: A pepperoni lover’s dream, this P’Zone is loaded with pepperoni and melted cheese for a crave curing meal any time of day.

All P’Zone pizzas are served with a side of marinara sauce.

“Not all five dollar offers are created equal,” said Bob Kraut, marketing communications VP for Pizza Hut. “Pizza Hut believes that five dollars should leave you full and happy, and the P’Zone does just that.”

The P’Zone, as well as all your other Pizza Hut favorites, is available for ordering at pizzahut.com. You can choose from four delicious varieties of Tuscani Pastas, great tasting WingStreet(R) chicken wings, and, of course, pizza! You can also place orders via mobile Web, text message, even the popular Facebook platform. For more information, log on to pizzahut.com.

About Pizza Hut:

Pizza Hut, an American icon, delivers more pizza, pasta and wings than any other restaurant. A shining example of success in American entrepreneurism, the company began 50 years ago in Wichita, Kansas and today operates more than 10,000 restaurants in hundreds of countries. Pizza Hut, Inc. is a subsidiary of Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE: YUM). To check out what’s new at “The Hut” visit www.pizzahut.com.

CONTACT:
Dan Skinner
Zeno PR for Pizza Hut
312-396-9706
dan.skinner@zenogroup.com

SOURCE Pizza Hut

London Still Top Spot for US Travelers Despite Economic Downturn
May 31st, 2009 by TopDollar

London Still Top Spot for US Travelers Despite Economic Downturn

Skyscanner Reveals Most Popular European Destinations and This Year’s Fastest Climbers

EDINBURGH, Scotland, May 28 /PRNewswire/ — Cheap flight site Skyscanner.com (http://www.skyscanner.com) reveals that London is still the most popular starting point for American tourists heading to Europe this summer.

The UK capital is the most searched for European destination by US users on the Skyscanner site, followed by Paris, Rome, Dublin and Frankfurt.

Barry Smith, Skyscanner director and co-founder commented:

“Despite the recession, people who have been planning a vacation in Europe are very reluctant to sacrifice their trip, but value is more important than ever and they are determined to find the best deals out there – one of the reasons we have been seeing a steady rise of US users on Skyscanner.com.”

Skyscanner also examined the European destinations that have seen the sharpest rise in interest from US travelers. Athens in Greece has seen the biggest growth, up 224%, followed by Barcelona up 140%, Madrid up 138%, Paris up 108% and Dublin up 96%, compared to summer 2008.

Despite the economic downturn, Europe has become cheaper for US travelers due to the growing strength of the US dollar against European currencies. In May 08, one Euro cost 1.55 US dollars, but now costs around 1.40 US dollars.

The dollar has also strengthened against the GBP; in May 08, one GBP cost almost two US dollars. Now, one GBP costs only 1.60 US dollars.

Most searched for European destinations for summer 09 on Skyscanner.net
1. London
2. Paris
3. Rome
4. Dublin
5. Frankfurt
Fastest growing destinations; summer 08 compared to summer 09
1. Athens (+224%)
2. Barcelona (+140%)
3. Madrid (+138%)
4. Paris (108%+)
5. Dublin (+96%)
About Skyscanner.com

Skyscanner provides instant online comparison on flight prices for over 670,000 routes on over 600 airlines. With Skyscanner, users can browse without having to enter specific dates or even destinations, and Skyscanner is available in 20 different languages including Spanish, French, German and Chinese.

http://www.skyscanner.net

SOURCE Skyscanner

TD Bank Financial Group Reports Second Quarter 2009 Results
May 31st, 2009 by TopDollar

TD Bank Financial Group Reports Second Quarter 2009 Results

SECOND QUARTER FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS, compared with the second quarter a
year ago:

-   Reported diluted earnings per share(1) were $0.68, compared with
$1.12.
-   Adjusted diluted earnings per share(2) were $1.23, compared with
$1.32.
-   Reported net income(1) was $618 million, compared with $852 million.
-   Adjusted net income(2) was $1,089 million, compared with
$973 million.

YEAR-TO-DATE FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS, six months ended April 30, 2009,
compared with the corresponding period a year ago:

-   Reported diluted earnings per share(1) were $1.50, compared with
$2.44.
-   Adjusted diluted earnings per share(2) were $2.58, compared with
$2.77.
-   Reported net income(1) was $1,330 million, compared with
$1,822 million.
-   Adjusted net income(2) was $2,238 million, compared with
$2,033 million.

SECOND QUARTER ADJUSTMENTS (ITEMS OF NOTE)

The second quarter reported diluted earnings per share figures included
the following items of note:

-   Amortization of intangibles of $127 million after tax (14 cents per
share), compared with $92 million after tax (12 cents per share) in
the second quarter last year.
-   A loss of $134 million after tax (16 cents per share) due to the loss
in excess of the accrued amount of the economic hedges related to the
reclassified available-for-sale debt securities portfolio.
-   Restructuring and integration charges of $50 million after tax
(6 cents per share), relating to the acquisition of Commerce,
compared with $30 million after tax (4 cents per share) in the second
quarter last year.
-   A loss of $44 million after tax (5 cents per share) due to the change
in fair value of credit default swaps hedging the corporate loan
book, net of provision for credit losses, compared with a gain of
$1 million after tax in the same quarter last year.
-   An increase of $77 million after tax (9 cents per share) in general
allowance for Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking (excluding
VFC) and Wholesale Banking.
-   Settlement of TD Banknorth shareholder litigation of $39 million
after tax (5 cents per share).

All dollar amounts are expressed in Canadian currency unless otherwise
noted.

(1) Reported results are prepared in accordance with Canadian generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
(2) Reported and adjusted results are explained under the “How the Bank
Reports” section.

TORONTO, May 28 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ – TD Bank Financial Group (TDBFG) today announced its financial results for the second quarter ended April 30, 2009. Results for the quarter included solid earnings contributions from TD’s personal and commercial banking operations in Canada and the United States and very strong Wholesale Banking results, while Wealth Management continued to manage prudently through challenging financial markets.

“All TD businesses are holding up very well under the weight of the recession in Canada and the United States,” said Ed Clark, President and Chief Executive Officer, TDBFG. “With adjusted earnings over $1 billion again this quarter, we’re feeling quite good about these results. They provide further evidence of TD’s earnings power and capital strength – strengths that have helped us earn through higher credit losses and end the quarter with a robust Tier 1 capital ratio of 10.9%. These strengths also allowed us to continue making the strategic investments that drive future growth, positioning TD to come out of this global recession with business momentum.”

SECOND QUARTER BUSINESS SEGMENT PERFORMANCE

Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking

Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking posted earnings of $589 million in the second quarter, up 1% from the same period last year. The combination of solid revenue growth and prudent expense management more than offset the significant increase in provision for credit losses (PCL). Strong volume growth in deposits and lending continued this quarter.

“Operating in a challenging economic environment, TD Canada Trust chalked up two significant achievements this quarter,” said Clark. “First, its earnings power continued to push through the economic headwinds and deliver solid results – results that were generated while we continued to invest in future growth, adding six new branches and 31 business bankers and advisers. Second, our internal measure of customer loyalty and advocacy increased for the sixth month in a row, as dedicated employees worked together with customers and clients to address financial challenges. Service means something different in a downturn of this magnitude and we’re committed to rising to that challenge.”

Wealth Management

Wealth Management, including TDBFG’s equity share in TD Ameritrade, earned $126 million in the quarter, down 31% from the second quarter of last year, as very strong transactional volumes in online brokerage operations were more than offset by the impact of market declines on the mutual funds and advice-based businesses. As previously announced, TD Ameritrade contributed $48 million in earnings to the segment, with near-record new account openings in its quarter ended March 31, 2009.

“Our Wealth Management segment performed as expected given the environment,” said Clark. “While we have felt the impact of margin pressure as a result of low nominal interest rates, we’ve seen impressive online brokerage volumes and continued growth in new client assets. In the U.S., TD Ameritrade continues to maintain its leadership position in active trading and is growing net new retail assets faster than its largest peer.”

“And this quarter we continued to increase the number of client-facing advisors. This investment in our Wealth businesses through these tough times positions us extremely well for the eventual market recovery.”

U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking

U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking for the quarter generated $231 million in reported net income and $281 million in adjusted net income, an 8% decline in adjusted net income from the previous quarter due to increased provision for credit losses and seasonal factors. Second quarter adjusted earnings were 116% higher than adjusted earnings for the same period last year, with much of the increase due to the fact that Commerce earnings did not contribute to this segment until the third quarter of 2008.

“In most of our U.S. footprint, we’re the only triple-A rated bank around, and the TD brand is increasingly recognised for its safety and soundness. That recognition contributed to our ability to grow both deposits and loans despite continued economic stresses, gaining us market share and supporting the opening of 24 new stores so far in fiscal 2009,” said Clark. “We remain cautious on the U.S. economic environment and so have increased our reserves prudently, which is reflected in higher PCLs. But we continue to believe we’ll be a positive outlier, giving us the strength to take advantage of strategic opportunities.”

“A key accomplishment for us this quarter is our fourth consecutive win of the J.D. Power award for customer satisfaction. Winning this honour in the midst of the Commerce integration is an enormous achievement.”

Wholesale Banking

Wholesale Banking earned net income for the quarter of $173 million, up 86% compared with the same period last year. Strong interest rate and foreign exchange trading were partially offset by net realized security losses in the public equity investment portfolio. These losses were related to the strategic decision to exit the portfolio and redeploy the capital to support franchise operations.

“This was a very strong quarter for TD Securities, and we continue to be very pleased with the positioning of our Wholesale business,” said Clark. “The segment managed to perform very well while significantly reducing positions in the credit trading and public equity portfolios. Looking forward, we will continue to focus on growing our client-driven franchise businesses and solidifying our position as a top-three dealer in Canada.”

Conclusion

“While the next phase of this global recession will hurt all banks, at TD we’re extremely well positioned – not just to weather the storm but also to prepare the bank for future growth. In fact, there is a reasonable chance this may be a recession where we actually grow volumes through the downturn, as we continue to fill the gaps left by those who have exited the lending market and help ensure access to credit.”

CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

From time to time, TD Bank Financial Group (TDBFG or the Bank) makes written and oral forward-looking statements, including in this document, in other filings with Canadian regulators or the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and in other communications. In addition, the Bank’s senior management may make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, representatives of the media and others. All such statements are made pursuant to the “safe harbour” provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward- looking statements include, among others, statements regarding the Bank’s objectives and targets for 2009 and beyond, and strategies to achieve them, the outlook for the Bank’s business lines, and the Bank’s anticipated financial performance. The forward-looking information contained in this document is presented for the purpose of assisting our shareholders and analysts in understanding our financial position as at and for the periods ended on the dates presented and our strategic priorities and objectives, and may not be appropriate for other purposes. The economic assumptions for 2009 for the Bank are set out in the Bank’s 2008 Annual Report under the heading “Economic Summary and Outlook” and for each of our business segments, under the heading “Business Outlook and Focus for 2009.” Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as “will”, “should”, “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “estimate”, “plan”, “may” and “could”. By their very nature, these statements require us to make assumptions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, general and specific. Especially in light of the current, unprecedented financial and economic environment, such risks and uncertainties may cause actual results to differ materially from the expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements. Some of the factors – many of which are beyond our control and the effects of which can be difficult to predict – that could cause such differences include: credit, market (including equity and commodity), liquidity, interest rate, operational, reputational, insurance, strategic, foreign exchange, regulatory, legal and other risks discussed in the Bank’s 2008 Annual Report and in other regulatory filings made in Canada and with the SEC; general business and economic conditions in Canada, the U.S. and other countries in which the Bank conducts business, as well as the effect of changes in existing and newly introduced monetary and economic policies in those jurisdictions and changes in the foreign exchange rates for the currencies of those jurisdictions; the degree of competition in the markets in which the Bank operates, both from established competitors and new entrants; defaults by other financial institutions in Canada, the U.S. and other countries; the accuracy and completeness of information the Bank receives on customers and counterparties; the development and introduction of new products and services in markets; developing new distribution channels and realizing increased revenue from these channels; the Bank’s ability to execute its strategies, including its integration, growth and acquisition strategies and those of its subsidiaries, particularly in the U.S.; changes in accounting policies (including future accounting changes) and methods the Bank uses to report its financial condition, including uncertainties associated with critical accounting assumptions and estimates; changes to our credit ratings; global capital market activity; increased funding costs for credit due to market illiquidity and increased competition for funding; the Bank’s ability to attract and retain key executives; reliance on third parties to provide components of the Bank’s business infrastructure; the failure of third parties to comply with their obligations to the Bank or its affiliates as such obligations relate to the handling of personal information; technological changes; the use of new technologies in unprecedented ways to defraud the Bank or its customers and the organized efforts of increasingly sophisticated parties who direct their attempts to defraud the Bank or its customers through many channels; legislative and regulatory developments; change in tax laws; unexpected judicial or regulatory proceedings; continued negative impact of the U.S. securities litigation environment; unexpected changes in consumer spending and saving habits; the adequacy of the Bank’s risk management framework, including the risk that the Bank’s risk management models do not take into account all relevant factors; the possible impact on the Bank’s businesses of international conflicts and terrorism; acts of God, such as earthquakes; the effects of disease or illness on local, national or international economies; and the effects of disruptions to public infrastructure, such as transportation, communication, power or water supply. A substantial amount of the Bank’s business involves making loans or otherwise committing resources to specific companies, industries or countries. Unforeseen events affecting such borrowers, industries or countries could have a material adverse effect on the Bank’s businesses, financial results, financial condition or liquidity. The preceding list is not exhaustive of all possible risk factors and other factors could also adversely affect the Bank’s results. For more information, see the discussion starting on page 64 of the Bank’s 2008 Annual Report. All such factors should be considered carefully when making decisions with respect to the Bank, and undue reliance should not be placed on the Bank’s forward- looking statements. Any forward-looking information or statements contained in this document represent the views of management only as of the date hereof. The Bank does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by or on its behalf, except as required under applicable securities legislation.

This document was reviewed by the Bank’s Audit Committee and was approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors, on the Audit Committee’s recommendation, prior to its release.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OPERATING PERFORMANCE
————————————————————————-

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) is presented to enable readers to assess material changes in the financial condition and operational results of TD Bank Financial Group (TDBFG or the Bank) for the three and six months ended April 30, 2009, compared with the corresponding periods. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Bank’s unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included in this Report to Shareholders and with our 2008 Annual Report. This MD&A is dated May 27, 2009. Unless otherwise indicated, all amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars and have been primarily derived from the Bank’s Annual or Interim Consolidated Financial Statements prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Certain comparative amounts have been reclassified to conform to the presentation adopted in the current period. Additional information relating to the Bank is available on the Bank’s website http://www.td.com, as well as on SEDAR at http://www.sedar.com and on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) website at http://www.sec.gov (EDGAR filers section).

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
————————————————————————-
For the six
For the three months ended        months ended
(millions of           ————————————————–
Canadian dollars,       Apr. 30    Jan.31   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
except as noted)         2009(1)     2009      2008    2009(1)     2008
————————————————————————-
Results of operations
Total revenue             $4,325    $4,150    $3,388    $8,475    $6,992
Provision for credit
losses                      656       537       232     1,193       487
Non-interest expenses      3,051     3,020     2,206     6,071     4,434
Net income – reported(2)     618       712       852     1,330     1,822
Net income – adjusted(2)   1,089     1,149       973     2,238     2,033
Economic profit(3)            58       164       283       224       735
Return on common
equity – reported          6.6%      8.1%     13.4%      7.3%     15.4%
Return on invested
capital(3)                10.6%     11.7%     13.2%     11.1%     14.6%
————————————————————————-
Financial position
Total assets            $574,882  $585,365  $503,621  $574,882  $503,621
Total risk-weighted
assets                  199,745   211,715   178,635   199,745   178,635
Total shareholders’
equity                   39,627    38,050    30,595    39,627    30,595
————————————————————————-
Financial ratios -
reported
Efficiency ratio           70.6%     72.8%     65.1%     71.6%     63.4%
Tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted assets      10.9%     10.1%      9.1%     10.9%      9.1%
Provision for credit
losses as a % of net
average loans             1.12%     0.90%     0.48%     1.01%     0.51%
————————————————————————-
Common share information
- reported
(Canadian dollars)
Per share
Basic earnings           $0.68     $0.82     $1.12     $1.50     $2.46
Diluted earnings          0.68      0.82      1.12      1.50      2.44
Dividends                 0.61      0.61      0.59      1.22      1.16
Book value               42.60     41.57     36.70     42.60     36.70
Closing share price        47.10     39.80     66.11     47.10     66.11
Shares outstanding
(millions)
Average basic            848.8     832.6     747.7     840.6     732.9
Average diluted          849.8     834.2     753.7     841.9     739.0
End of period            850.6     848.7     802.9     850.6     802.9
Market capitalization
(billions of Canadian
dollars)                  $40.1     $33.8     $53.1     $40.1     $53.1
Dividend yield              5.9%      5.0%      3.5%      5.3%      3.4%
Dividend payout ratio      89.8%     75.5%     56.2%     82.1%     49.0%
Price to earnings
multiple                   12.0       9.1      12.1      12.0      12.1
————————————————————————-
Common share information
- adjusted
(Canadian dollars)
Per share
Basic earnings           $1.23     $1.35     $1.33     $2.58     $2.79
Diluted earnings          1.23      1.34      1.32      2.58      2.77
Dividend payout ratio      49.4%     46.1%     49.2%     47.7%     43.8%
Price to earnings
multiple                   10.0       8.3      11.5      10.0      11.5
————————————————————————-
(1) As explained in the “How the Bank Reports” section, effective this
quarter, as the reporting periods of U.S. entities are aligned with
the reporting period of the Bank, the results of U.S. entities for
the three months ended April 30, 2009 have been included with results
of the Bank, while the results of January 2009 have been included
directly in retained earnings and not included in the results of the
Bank.
(2) Adjusted and reported results are explained in the “How the Bank
Reports” section, which includes reconciliation between reported and
adjusted results.
(3) Economic profit and return on invested capital are non-GAAP financial
measures and are explained in the “Economic Profit and Return on
Invested Capital” section.

HOW WE PERFORMED

Corporate Overview

The Toronto-Dominion Bank and its subsidiaries are collectively known as TD Bank Financial Group (TDBFG or the Bank). The Bank is the sixth largest bank in North America by branches and serves approximately 17 million customers in four key businesses operating in a number of locations in key financial centres around the globe: Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking, including TD Canada Trust and TD Insurance; Wealth Management, including TD Waterhouse and an investment in TD Ameritrade; U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking through TD Banknorth Inc. (TD Banknorth) and TD Bank, America’s Most Convenient Bank; and Wholesale Banking, including TD Securities. The Bank also ranks among the world’s leading online financial services firms, with more than 5.5 million online customers. The Bank had $575 billion in assets on April 30, 2009. The Toronto-Dominion Bank trades under the symbol “TD” on the Toronto and New York Stock Exchanges.

How the Bank Reports

The Bank prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP and refers to results prepared in accordance with GAAP as “reported” results. The Bank also utilizes non-GAAP financial measures referred to as “adjusted” results to assess each of its businesses and to measure overall Bank performance. To arrive at adjusted results, the Bank removes “items of note”, net of income taxes, from reported results. The items of note relate to items which management does not believe are indicative of underlying business performance. The Bank believes that adjusted results provide the reader with a better understanding of how management views the Bank’s performance. The items of note are listed in the table on the following page. As explained, adjusted results are different from reported results determined in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted results, items of note and related terms used in this document are not defined terms under GAAP and, therefore, may not be comparable to similar terms used by other issuers.

For the purpose of alignment of reporting periods with the Bank, effective the quarter ended April 30, 2009, the reporting periods of TD Banknorth and Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (Commerce) have been aligned with the reporting period of the Bank as described in Note 1 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements. Previously, the reporting periods of TD Banknorth and Commerce were included in the Bank’s financial statements on a one month lag. Accordingly, to maintain comparability and include only six months of results through April 30, 2009, the results of TD Banknorth and Commerce for the three months ended April 30, 2009 have been included with the results of the Bank for the three and six months ended April 30, 2009 while the results of January 2009 have been included directly in retained earnings and not included in the results of the Bank.

The following tables provide reconciliations between the Bank’s reported and adjusted results.

Operating Results – Reported
————————————————————————-
For the six
For the three months ended        months ended
————————————————–
(millions of             Apr. 30   Jan. 31   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
Canadian dollars)          2009      2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Net interest income       $2,940    $2,728    $1,858    $5,668    $3,646
Other income               1,385     1,422     1,530     2,807     3,346
————————————————————————-
Total revenue              4,325     4,150     3,388     8,475     6,992
Provision for credit
losses                     (656)     (537)     (232)   (1,193)     (487)
Non-interest expenses     (3,051)   (3,020)   (2,206)   (6,071)   (4,434)
————————————————————————-
Income before
income taxes, non-
controlling interests
in subsidiaries and
equity in net income of
an associated company       618       593       950     1,211     2,071
(Provision for) recovery
of income taxes             (35)       58      (160)       23      (395)
Non-controlling interests
in subsidiaries, net
of income taxes             (28)      (28)       (9)      (56)      (17)
Equity in net income of
an associated company,
net of income taxes          63        89        71       152       163
————————————————————————-
Net income – reported        618       712       852     1,330     1,822
Preferred dividends          (41)      (29)      (11)      (70)      (19)
————————————————————————-
Net income available to
common shareholders -
reported                   $577      $683      $841    $1,260    $1,803
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Adjusted Net Income to Reported Net Income
————————————————————————-
Operating results
- adjusted                                                  For the six
For the three months ended        months ended
————————————————–
(millions of             Apr. 30   Jan. 31   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
Canadian dollars)          2009      2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Net interest income       $2,940    $2,728    $1,858    $5,668    $3,646
Other income(1)            1,612     1,722     1,529     3,334     3,320
————————————————————————-
Total revenue              4,552     4,450     3,387     9,002     6,966
Provision for credit
losses(2)                  (546)     (457)     (232)   (1,003)     (470)
Non-interest expenses(3)  (2,745)   (2,741)   (2,041)   (5,486)   (4,147)
————————————————————————-
Income before
income taxes, non-
controlling interests
in subsidiaries and
equity in net income of
an associated company     1,261     1,252     1,114     2,513     2,349
Provision for income
taxes(4)                   (223)     (179)     (220)     (402)     (495)
Non-controlling interests
in subsidiaries, net
of income taxes             (28)      (28)       (9)      (56)      (17)
Equity in net income of
an associated company,
net of income taxes(5)       79       104        88       183       196
————————————————————————-
Net income – adjusted      1,089     1,149       973     2,238     2,033
Preferred dividends          (41)      (29)      (11)      (70)      (19)
————————————————————————-
Net income available to
common shareholders -
adjusted                  1,048     1,120       962     2,168     2,014
————————————————————————-
Items of note affecting
net income, net of
income taxes
Amortization of
intangibles(6)             (127)     (127)      (92)     (254)     (167)
Decrease in fair value
of derivatives hedging
the reclassified
available-for-sale
debt securities
portfolio(7)               (134)     (200)        -      (334)        -
Restructuring and
integration charges
relating to the
Commerce acquisition(8)     (50)      (67)      (30)     (117)      (30)
(Decrease) increase in
fair value of credit
default swaps hedging
the corporate loan book,
net of provision for
credit losses(9)            (44)       12         1       (32)       26
Other tax items(10)            -         -         -         -       (20)
Provision for insurance
claims(11)                    -         -         -         -       (20)
General allowance
increase in Canadian
Personal and Commercial
Banking (excluding VFC)
and Wholesale Banking       (77)      (55)        -      (132)        -
Settlement of TD
Banknorth shareholder
litigation(12)              (39)        -         -       (39)        -
————————————————————————-
Total items of note         (471)     (437)     (121)     (908)     (211)
————————————————————————-
Net income available to
common shareholders -
reported                   $577      $683      $841    $1,260    $1,803
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1)  Adjusted other income excludes the following items of note: second
quarter 2009 – $61 million loss due to change in fair value of
credit default swaps (CDS) hedging the corporate loan book, as
explained in footnote 9; $166 million loss due to change in fair
value of derivatives hedging the reclassified available-for-sale
(AFS) debt securities portfolio, as explained in footnote 7; first
quarter 2009 – $13 million gain due to change in fair value of CDS
hedging the corporate loan book; $313 million loss due to change in
fair value of derivatives hedging the reclassified AFS debt
securities portfolio; second quarter 2008 – $1 million gain due to
change in fair value of CDS hedging the corporate loan book; first
quarter 2008 – $55 million gain due to change in fair value of CDS
hedging the corporate loan book; $30 million provision for insurance
claims, as explained in footnote 11.
(2)  Adjusted provision for credit losses excludes the following items of
note: second quarter 2009 – $110 million increase in general
allowance for credit losses in Canadian Personal and Commercial
Banking (excluding VFC) and Wholesale Banking; first quarter 2009 -
$80 million increase in general allowance for credit losses in
Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking (excluding VFC) and
Wholesale Banking.
(3)  Adjusted non-interest expenses excludes the following items of note:
second quarter 2009 – $171 million amortization of intangibles, as
explained in footnote 6; $77 million restructuring and integration
charges related to the Commerce acquisition, as explained in
footnote 8; settlement of TD Banknorth shareholder litigation of
$58 million, as explained in footnote 12; first quarter 2009 -
$173 million amortization of intangibles; $106 million restructuring
and integration charges related to the Commerce acquisition; second
quarter 2008 – $117 million amortization of intangibles; $48 million
restructuring and integration charges related to the Commerce
acquisition; first quarter 2008 – $122 million amortization of
intangibles.
(4)  For reconciliation between reported and adjusted provision for
income taxes, see the ‘Reconciliation of non-GAAP provision for
(recovery of) income taxes’ table in the “Taxes” section.
(5)  Adjusted equity in net income of an associated company excludes the
following items of note: second quarter 2009 – $16 million
amortization of intangibles, as explained in footnote 6; first
quarter 2009 – $15 million amortization of intangibles; second
quarter 2008 – $17 million amortization of intangibles; first
quarter 2008 – $16 million amortization of intangibles.
(6)  Amortization of intangibles relates to the Canada Trust acquisition
in 2000, the TD Banknorth acquisition in 2005 and its privatization
in 2007, the acquisitions by TD Banknorth of Hudson United Bancorp
in 2006 and Interchange Financial Services Corporation in 2007, the
Commerce acquisition in 2008 and the amortization of intangibles
included in equity in net income of TD Ameritrade.
(7)  Effective August 1, 2008, as a result of recent deterioration in
markets and severe dislocation in the credit market, the Bank
changed its trading strategy with respect to certain trading debt
securities. The Bank no longer intends to actively trade in these
debt securities. Accordingly, the Bank reclassified certain debt
securities from trading to AFS category in accordance with the
Amendments to the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA)
Handbook Section 3855, Financial Instruments – Recognition and
Measurement. As part of the Bank’s trading strategy, these debt
securities are economically hedged, primarily with CDS and interest
rate swap contracts. This includes foreign exchange translation
exposure related to the debt securities portfolio and the
derivatives hedging it. These derivatives are not eligible for
reclassification and are recorded on a fair value basis with changes
in fair value recorded in the period’s earnings. Management believes
that this asymmetry in the accounting treatment between derivatives
and the reclassified debt securities results in volatility in
earnings from period to period that is not indicative of the
economics of the underlying business performance in Wholesale
Banking. As a result, the derivatives are accounted for on an
accrual basis in Wholesale Banking and the gains and losses related
to the derivatives in excess of the accrued amounts are reported in
the Corporate segment and disclosed as an item of note. Adjusted
results of the Bank exclude the gains and losses of the derivatives
in excess of the accrued amount.
(8)  As a result of the acquisition of Commerce and related restructuring
and integration initiatives undertaken, the Bank incurred
restructuring and integration charges. Restructuring charges
consisted of employee severance costs, the costs of amending certain
executive employment and award agreements and the write-down of
long-lived assets due to impairment. Integration charges consisted
of costs related to employee retention, external professional
consulting charges and marketing (including customer communication
and rebranding). In the Interim Consolidated Statement of Income,
the restructuring and integration charges are included in non-
interest expenses.
(9)  The Bank purchases CDS to hedge the credit risk in Wholesale
Banking’s corporate lending portfolio. These CDS do not qualify for
hedge accounting treatment and are measured at fair value with
changes in fair value recognized in current period’s earnings. The
related loans are accounted for at amortized cost. Management
believes that this asymmetry in the accounting treatment between CDS
and loans would result in periodic profit and loss volatility which
is not indicative of the economics of the corporate loan portfolio
or the underlying business performance in Wholesale Banking. As a
result, the CDS are accounted for on an accrual basis in Wholesale
Banking and the gains and losses on the CDS, in excess of the
accrued cost, are reported in the Corporate segment. Adjusted
results exclude the gains and losses on the CDS in excess of the
accrued cost.
(10) This represents the negative impact of the scheduled reductions in
the income tax rate on reduction of net future income tax assets.
(11) The provision for insurance claims related to a court decision in
Alberta. The Alberta government’s legislation effectively capping
minor injury insurance claims was challenged and held to be
unconstitutional. While the government of Alberta has appealed the
decision, the ultimate outcome remains uncertain. As a result, the
Bank accrued an additional actuarial liability for potential losses
in the first quarter of 2008.
(12) Upon the announcement of the privatization of TD Banknorth in
November 2006, certain minority shareholders of TD Banknorth
initiated class action litigation alleging various claims against
the Bank, TD Banknorth and TD Banknorth officers and directors. The
parties agreed to settle the litigation in February 2009 for
$61.3 million (US$50 million) of which $3.7 million (US$3 million)
had been previously accrued on privatization. A settlement approval
hearing with the Court of Chancery in Delaware is scheduled for
June 2009.

Reconciliation of Reported Earnings per Share (EPS) to Adjusted EPS(1)
————————————————————————-
For the six
For the three months ended        months ended
————————————————–
Apr. 30   Jan. 31   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
(Canadian dollars)          2009      2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Diluted – reported         $0.68     $0.82     $1.12     $1.50     $2.44
Items of note affecting
income (as above)          0.55      0.52      0.16      1.08      0.29
Items of note affecting
EPS only(2)                   -         -      0.04         -      0.04
————————————————————————-
Diluted – adjusted         $1.23     $1.34     $1.32     $2.58     $2.77
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
Basic – reported           $0.68     $0.82     $1.12     $1.50     $2.46
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1) EPS is computed by dividing net income available to common
shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding
during the period. As a result, the sum of the quarterly EPS may not
equal to year-to-date EPS.
(2) The diluted EPS figures do not include Commerce earnings for the
month of April 2008 because there was a month lag between fiscal
quarter ends until the prior quarter, while share issuance on
transaction close resulted in a one-time negative earnings impact of
4 cents per share.

Amortization of Intangibles, Net of Income Taxes(1)
————————————————————————-
For the six
For the three months ended        months ended
————————————————–
(millions of             Apr. 30   Jan. 31   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
Canadian dollars)          2009      2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Canada Trust                 $39       $40       $37       $79       $58
TD Bank, N.A.                 70        70        32       140        65
TD Ameritrade (included
in equity in net income
of an associated company)    16        15        17        31        33
Other                          2         2         6         4        11
————————————————————————-
Amortization of
intangibles, net of
income taxes               $127      $127       $92      $254      $167
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1) Amortization of intangibles is included in the Corporate segment.

Economic Profit and Return on Invested Capital

The Bank utilizes economic profit as a tool to measure shareholder value creation. Economic profit is adjusted net income available to common shareholders less a charge for average invested capital. Average invested capital is equal to average common equity for the period plus the average cumulative after-tax goodwill and intangible assets amortized as of the reporting date. The rate used in the charge for capital is the equity cost of capital calculated using the capital asset pricing model. The charge represents an assumed minimum return required by common shareholders on the Bank’s invested capital. The Bank’s goal is to achieve positive and growing economic profit.

Return on invested capital (ROIC) is adjusted net income available to common shareholders divided by average invested capital. ROIC is a variation of the economic profit measure that is useful in comparison to the equity cost of capital. Both ROIC and the equity cost of capital are percentage rates, while economic profit is a dollar measure. When ROIC exceeds the equity cost of capital, economic profit is positive. The Bank’s goal is to maximize economic profit by achieving ROIC that exceeds the equity cost of capital.

Economic profit and ROIC are non-GAAP financial measures as these are not defined terms under GAAP. Readers are cautioned that earnings and other measures adjusted to a basis other than GAAP do not have standardized meanings under GAAP and therefore, may not be comparable to similar terms used by other issuers.

The following table reconciles between the Bank’s economic profit, ROIC and net income available to common shareholders – adjusted. Adjusted results, items of note and related terms are discussed in the “How the Bank Reports” section.

Reconciliation of Economic Profit, Return on Invested Capital and Net
Income Available to Common Shareholders – Adjusted
————————————————————————-
For the six
For the three months ended        months ended
————————————————–
(millions of             Apr. 30   Jan. 31   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
Canadian dollars)          2009      2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Average common equity    $36,120   $33,559   $25,593   $34,777   $23,599
Average cumulative
goodwill/intangible
assets amortized,
net of income taxes       4,491     4,379     4,082     4,435     4,049
————————————————————————-
Average invested
capital                 $40,611   $37,938   $29,675   $39,212   $27,648
Rate charged for
invested capital          10.0%     10.0%      9.3%     10.0%      9.3%
————————————————————————-
Charge for invested
capital                   $(990)    $(956)    $(679)  $(1,944)  $(1,279)
————————————————————————-
Net income available
to common shareholders
- reported                 $577      $683      $841    $1,260    $1,803
Items of note impacting
income, net of
income taxes                471       437       121       908       211
————————————————————————-
Net income available to
common shareholders
- adjusted               $1,048    $1,120      $962    $2,168    $2,014
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
Economic profit              $58      $164      $283      $224      $735
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
Return on invested
capital                   10.6%     11.7%     13.2%     11.1%     14.6%
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

FINANCIAL RESULTS OVERVIEW

Performance Summary

An overview of the Bank’s performance on an adjusted basis for the second quarter of 2009 against the financial shareholder indicators included in the 2008 Annual Report is outlined below. Shareholder performance indicators help guide and benchmark the Bank’s accomplishments. For the purposes of this analysis, the Bank utilizes adjusted earnings, which excludes items of note from the reported results that are prepared in accordance with GAAP. Reported and adjusted results and items of note are explained in the “How the Bank Reports” section.

-   Adjusted diluted earnings per share for the six months ended
April 30, 2009 were down 7% from the same period last year,
reflecting common and preferred equity issuance in fiscal 2009 to
further strengthen the Bank’s capital position. The Bank’s goal is to
achieve 7 – 10% adjusted earnings per share growth over the longer
term. In the current environment, meeting this goal will be
challenging in the short and medium term.
-   Adjusted return on risk-weighted assets (RWA) for the first six
months of 2009 was 2.1% compared with 2.6% in the first half of 2008.
-   For the twelve months ended April 30, 2009, the total shareholder
return was (25.2)% which was below the Canadian peer average of
(17.7)%.

Impact of U.S. dollar on U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking and TD
Ameritrade Translated Earnings

Our U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking segment earnings and TD
Ameritrade equity pick-up are impacted by fluctuations in the U.S.
dollar/Canadian dollar exchange rate.
Depreciation of the Canadian dollar had a favourable impact on our
consolidated earnings for the quarter and for the six months ended April 30,
2009, compared with the corresponding periods of 2008, as shown in the table
below.

Impact of U.S. Dollar on U.S. Translated Earnings
————————————————————————-
For the three         For the six
months ended        months ended
————————————–
Apr. 30 2009 vs.    Apr. 30 2009 vs.
(millions of Canadian dollars)          Apr. 30 2008        Apr. 30 2008
————————————————————————-
U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking
Increased total revenue                       $252                $483
Increased non-interest expenses                144                 279
Increased net income                            55                 114
————————————————————————-
TD Ameritrade
Increased equity pick-up                        $9                 $24
————————————————————————-
Earnings per share impact                      $0.06               $0.14
————————————————————————-

Net Income

Year-over-year comparison
————————-

Reported net income for the quarter was $618 million, a decrease of $234 million, or 27%, compared with the second quarter last year. Adjusted net income for the quarter was $1,089 million, an increase of $116 million or 12%. The increase in adjusted net income was due to higher earnings in U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking and Wholesale Banking, which was partially offset by lower earnings from the Wealth Management segment and greater loss in the Corporate segment. U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking adjusted net income increased largely due to earnings from Commerce since its acquisition on March 31, 2008. Wholesale Banking’s results in the quarter included strong trading revenues, led by interest rate and foreign exchange revenue, partially offset by net security losses in the public equity investment portfolio (Head Office Portfolio). Wealth Management net income decreased due to market declines in assets under management and assets under administration in mutual funds and advice-based businesses, net interest margin compression and lower earnings from TD Ameritrade due to lower underlying earnings related largely to lower net interest margins in the quarter. The Corporate segment reported an increased net loss driven by higher unallocated corporate expenses and the impact of a favourable tax item reported last year partially offset by net gains from securitization and net income relating to hedging and treasury activities.

Prior quarter comparison
————————

Reported net income for the quarter decreased $94 million, or 13%, compared with the prior quarter. Adjusted net income for the quarter decreased $60 million or 5%. The decrease in adjusted net income was due to lower earnings in the Wholesale Banking, U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking and Wealth Management segments, which was partially offset by a lower net loss from the Corporate segment. Wholesale Banking decreased mainly due to lower trading revenue. U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking adjusted net income decreased largely due to seasonal factors and higher provision for credit losses (PCL) that were driven by a cyclical increase in bankruptcies and delinquencies. Wealth Management net income decreased due to a lower contribution from TD Ameritrade. The Corporate segment net loss was lower this quarter due largely to an increase in net securitization gains.

Year-to-date comparison
———————–

On a year-to-date basis, reported net income was $1,330 million, a decrease of $492 million, or 27%, compared with the same period last year. Year-to-date adjusted net income increased $205 million or 10%. The increase in adjusted net income was primarily driven by higher U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking net income due to the inclusion of Commerce and higher earnings from Wholesale Banking which was partially offset by lower earnings in the Wealth Management, Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking and Corporate segments. Wholesale Banking net income was primarily driven by higher trading revenue and an increase in client capital market activity. Wealth Management delivered lower earnings due to lower revenues in mutual funds and advice-based businesses driven by lower assets under management and assets under administration, lower interest income due to net interest margin compression and a decline in TD Ameritrade’s underlying earnings. Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking earnings decreased due to higher PCLs. Corporate segment net loss increased due the impact of retail hedging activity and costs related to increased corporate financing activity, higher unallocated corporate expenses and the impact of favourable tax items reported last year.

Net Interest Income

Year-over-year comparison
————————-

Net interest income for the quarter was $2,940 million, an increase of $1,082 million, or 58%, compared with the second quarter last year. The growth in net interest income was driven by the U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking, Wholesale Banking and Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking segments partially offset by Wealth Management. U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking net interest income increased primarily due to the inclusion of Commerce. Wholesale Banking net interest income increased primarily due to higher trading-related net interest income. Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking net interest income increased due to strong volume growth across most banking products, particularly in real-estate secured lending, partially offset by a 2 basis point (bps) decline in margin on average earning assets to 2.94%. Wealth Management net interest income decreased primarily due to net interest margin compression and lower margin loans.

Prior quarter comparison
————————

Net interest income increased $212 million, or 8%, compared with the prior quarter. The growth in net interest income was driven by the U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking and Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking segments with partial offsets in the Wholesale Banking, Wealth Management and Corporate segments. U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking net interest income increased primarily due to strong volume growth across all products that was partially offset by a 4 bps decline in margin on average earning assets. Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking net interest income increased due to strong volume growth across most banking products and a 12 bps increase in margin on average earning assets. Wholesale Banking net interest income decreased, primarily due to lower trading-related net interest income. Wealth Management net interest income decreased primarily due to net interest margin compression and lower margin loans. Corporate segment net interest income increased due to higher net income related to treasury activities.

Year-to-date comparison
———————–

On a year-to-date basis, net interest income of $5,668 million increased $2,022 million, or 55%, compared with the same period last year. The growth was driven primarily by the U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking, Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking and Wholesale Banking segments partially offset by Wealth Management. U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking net interest income increased primarily due to the inclusion of Commerce. Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking net interest income increased primarily due to strong volume growth in lending and deposits which was partially offset by a 9 bps decline in margin on average earning assets to 2.88%. Wholesale Banking net interest income increased largely due to higher trading-related net interest income. Wealth Management net interest income decreased primarily due to net interest margin compression.

Other Income

Year-over-year comparison
————————-

Reported other income for the second quarter was $1,385 million, a decrease of $145 million, or 9%, compared with the second quarter of last year. Adjusted other income for the quarter was $1,612 million, an increase of $83 million or 5%. The growth was driven primarily by the U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking and Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking segments with partial offsets in the Wholesale Banking and Wealth Management segments. The increase in adjusted other income was driven by U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking, primarily due to the Commerce acquisition, as well as higher insurance and fee income in Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking. Other income in Wholesale Banking decreased primarily due to net security losses related to the equity investment portfolio that were recognized during the quarter. Wealth Management other income decreased as the impact of market declines in mutual funds and advice-based business asset levels were only partially offset by continued strength in trading volumes in our online brokerage business.

Prior quarter comparison
————————

Reported other income decreased $37 million, or 3%, compared with the prior quarter. Adjusted other income decreased $110 million, or 6%. The decrease in adjusted other income was due to decreases in the Wholesale Banking, Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking and U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking segments. Wholesale Banking other income decreased due to lower trading revenue. Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking other income decreased primarily due to fewer calendar days in the current quarter, an adjustment related to the cost of Visa travel reward points and higher loss ratios in the insurance business. U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking other income decreased primarily due to lower fee income.

Year-to-date comparison
———————–

Reported other income of $2,807 million decreased $539 million, or 16%, compared with the same period last year. Year-to-date adjusted other income increased $14 million from the previous year. The increase in adjusted other income was due to an increase in the U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking segment which was partially offset by decreases in the Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking, Wholesale Banking and Wealth Management segments. The U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking increase was due to the inclusion of Commerce results. Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking other income decreased primarily due to an adjustment related to the cost of Visa travel reward points and higher loss ratios in the insurance business. The decrease in Wholesale Banking was driven by net security losses related to the public equity investment portfolio. Wealth Management experienced a small decline in other income driven by lower revenue in mutual funds and lower average fees.

Provision for Credit Losses

Year-over-year comparison
————————-

During the quarter, the Bank recorded PCL of $656 million, an increase of $424 million compared with the second quarter last year. The increase was primarily due to higher provisions in U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking and Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking, and an increase of $110 million in general allowance for credit losses related to the Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking (excluding VFC) and Wholesale Banking segments.

Prior quarter comparison
————————

PCL for the second quarter was up $119 million from the prior quarter. The increase was primarily due to higher provisions in the U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking and Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking segments, and an increase in general allowance for credit losses related to the Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking (excluding VFC) and Wholesale Banking segments.

Year-to-date comparison
———————–

On a year-to-date basis, PCL of $1,193 million increased $706 million, or 145%. The increase was primarily due to higher provisions in the U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking and Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking segments, and an increase of $190 million in general allowance for credit losses related to the Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking (excluding VFC) and Wholesale Banking segments.

Provision for Credit Losses
————————————————————————-
For the six
For the three months ended        months ended
————————————————–
(millions of             Apr. 30   Jan. 31   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
Canadian dollars)          2009      2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Net new specifics
(net of reversals)         $446      $386      $244      $832      $511
Recoveries                   (25)      (24)      (33)      (49)      (65)
————————————————————————-
Provision for credit
losses – specifics          421       362       211       783       446
Change in general allowance
for credit losses
VFC                         22        21        16        43        31
U.S. Personal and
Commercial Banking        103        74         5       177         9
Canadian Personal and
Commercial Banking
(excluding VFC) and
Wholesale Banking         110        80         -       190         -
Other                        -         -         -         -         1
————————————————————————-
Total                       $656      $537      $232    $1,193      $487
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

Non-Interest Expenses and Efficiency Ratio

Year-over-year comparison
————————-

Reported non-interest expenses for the quarter were $3,051 million, an increase of $845 million, or 38%, compared with the second quarter last year. Adjusted non-interest expenses of $2,745 million increased $704 million, or 34%. The increase in adjusted non-interest expense was primarily driven by growth in the operating business segments. U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking increased primarily due to the inclusion of Commerce. Wholesale Banking non-interest expenses increased, due primarily to higher variable compensation on stronger results, higher severance and investment in control and risk initiatives. Wealth Management non-interest expenses increased due to continued investment in the business partially offset by lower variable expenses. Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking non-interest expenses increased due to higher employee compensation and investments in branches.

The reported efficiency ratio was 70.6%, compared with 65.1% in the second quarter last year. The adjusted efficiency ratio remained unchanged from the same period last year at 60.3%.

Prior quarter comparison
————————

Reported non-interest expenses increased $31 million, or 1%, compared with the prior quarter. Adjusted non-interest expenses increased $4 million, which was relatively unchanged, due to higher expenses in U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking, partially offset by lower expenses in Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking, Wholesale Banking and Wealth Management. U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking adjusted non-interest expenses increased primarily due to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) premiums and timing of payroll benefits. Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking non-interest expenses decreased due to lower litigation costs. Wholesale Banking non-interest expenses decreased due to lower variable compensation and severance costs. Wealth Management non-interest expenses decreased due to lower variable compensation.

The reported efficiency ratio was 70.6%, compared with 72.8% in the prior quarter. The adjusted efficiency ratio was 60.3%, compared with 61.6% in the prior quarter.

Year-to-date comparison
———————–

On a year-to-date basis, reported non-interest expenses were $6,071 million, an increase of $1,637 million, or 37%, compared with the same period last year. The current year-to-date reported non-interest expenses included $183 million of restructuring and integration charges attributable to the Commerce acquisition. Adjusted non-interest expenses were $5,486 million, an increase of $1,338 million, or 32%. The increase in adjusted non-interest expense was primarily driven by growth in the operating business segments. U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking expenses increased due to the inclusion of Commerce. Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking expenses increased due to higher employee compensation. Wholesale Banking expenses increased primarily due to higher variable compensation and severance costs. Wealth Management expenses increased due to the continued investment in growing our advice-based businesses and related support staff.

The reported efficiency ratio was 71.6%, compared with 63.4% in the same period last year. The Bank’s adjusted efficiency ratio was 61.0%, compared with 59.5% in the same period last year.

Taxes

As discussed in the “How the Bank Reports” section, the Bank adjusts its reported results to assess each of its businesses and to measure overall Bank performance. As such, the provision for income taxes is stated on a reported and an adjusted basis.

The Bank’s reported effective tax rate was 5.7% for the second quarter, compared with 16.8% in the same quarter last year and (9.8)% in the prior quarter. On a year-to-date basis, the Bank’s effective tax rate was (1.9)%, compared with 19.1% in the same period last year. The negative reported effective tax rate was primarily caused by a significant decrease in reported net income before taxes, a proportionate increase in tax exempt income, and a lower effective tax rate on international operations.

Taxes
————————————————————————-
For the three months ended
———————————————-
(millions of                     Apr. 30         Jan. 31         Apr. 30
Canadian dollars)                  2009            2009            2008
————————————————————————-
Income taxes at Canadian
statutory income tax rate  $196   31.8%    $189   31.8%    $310   32.7%
Increase (decrease)
resulting from:
Dividends received         (85)  (13.8)   (132)  (22.3)    (79)   (8.3)
Rate differentials on
international
operations               (117)  (19.0)   (134)  (22.5)    (69)   (7.3)
Other – net                 41     6.7      19     3.2      (2)   (0.3)
————————————————————————-
Provision for (recovery
of) income taxes and
effective income tax
rate – reported             $35    5.7%    $(58) (9.8)%    $160   16.8%
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

———————————————————
For the six months ended
——————————
(millions of                     Apr. 30         Apr. 30
Canadian dollars)                  2009            2008
———————————————————
Income taxes at Canadian
statutory income tax rate  $385   31.8%    $677   32.7%
Increase (decrease)
resulting from:
Dividends received        (217)  (17.9)   (166)   (8.0)
Rate differentials on
international
operations               (251)  (20.7)   (153)   (7.4)
Other – net                 60     4.9      37     1.8
———————————————————
Provision for (recovery
of) income taxes and
effective income tax
rate – reported            $(23) (1.9)%    $395   19.1%
———————————————————
———————————————————

The Bank’s adjusted effective tax rate was 17.7% for the quarter, compared
with 19.7% in the same quarter last year and 14.3% in the prior quarter. On a
year-to-date basis, the Bank’s adjusted effective tax rate was 16.0%, compared
with 21.1% in the same period last year.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Provision for (Recovery of) Income Taxes
————————————————————————-
For the six
For the three months ended        months ended
————————————————–
(millions of             Apr. 30   Jan. 31   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
Canadian dollars)          2009      2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Provision for
(recovery of) income
taxes – reported            $35      $(58)     $160      $(23)     $395
Increase (decrease)
resulting from items
of note:
Amortization of
intangibles                60        61        42       121       105
Change in fair value
of derivatives hedging
the reclassified
available-for-sale
debt securities
portfolio                  32       113         -       145         -
Restructuring and
integration charges
relating to the
Commerce acquisition       27        39        18        66        18
Change in fair value
of credit default
swaps hedging the
corporate loan book,
net of provision for
credit losses              17        (1)        -        16       (13)
Other tax items              -         -         -         -       (20)
Provision for insurance
claims                      -         -         -         -        10
General allowance
increase in Canadian
Personal and Commercial
Banking (excluding VFC)
and Wholesale Banking      33        25         -        58         -
Settlement of TD
Banknorth shareholder
litigation                 19         -         -        19         -
————————————————————————-
Tax effect
- items of note             188       237        60       425       100
————————————————————————-
Provision for income
taxes – adjusted           $223      $179      $220      $402      $495
————————————————————————-
Effective income tax
rate – adjusted(1)        17.7%     14.3%     19.7%     16.0%     21.1%
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1) Adjusted effective income tax rate is adjusted provisions for income
taxes as a percentage of adjusted net income before taxes.

HOW OUR BUSINESSES PERFORMED

For management reporting purposes, the Bank’s operations and activities are organized around four key business segments operating in a number of locations in key financial centres around the globe: Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking, including TD Canada Trust and TD Insurance; Wealth Management, including TD Waterhouse and an investment in TD Ameritrade; U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking through TD Banknorth and TD Bank, America’s Most Convenient Bank; and Wholesale Banking, including TD Securities. The Bank’s other activities are grouped into the Corporate segment. Effective the third quarter of 2008, U.S. insurance and credit card businesses were transferred to the Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking segment, and the U.S. wealth management businesses to the Wealth Management segment for management reporting purposes to align with how these businesses are now being managed on a North American basis. Prior periods have not been reclassified as the impact was not material.

Results of each business segment reflect revenue, expenses, assets and liabilities generated by the businesses in that segment. The Bank measures and evaluates the performance of each segment based on adjusted results where applicable, and for those segments the Bank notes that the measure is adjusted. Amortization of intangible expense is included in the Corporate segment. Accordingly, net income for the operating business segments is presented before amortization of intangibles, as well as any other items of note not attributed to the operating segments. For further details, see the “How the Bank Reports” section, the “Business Focus” section in the 2008 Annual Report and Note 30 to the 2008 Consolidated Financial Statements. For information concerning the Bank’s measures of economic profit and return on invested capital, which are non-GAAP financial measures, see the “Economic Profit and Return on Invested Capital” section. Segmented information also appears in Note 14.

Net interest income within Wholesale Banking is calculated on a taxable equivalent basis (TEB), which means that the value of non-taxable or tax- exempt income, including dividends, is adjusted to its equivalent before-tax value. Using TEB allows the Bank to measure income from all securities and loans consistently and makes for a more meaningful comparison of net interest income with similar institutions. The TEB increase to net interest income and provision for income taxes reflected in Wholesale Banking results is reversed in the Corporate segment. The TEB adjustment for the quarter was $103 million, compared with $107 million in the second quarter last year, and $185 million in the prior quarter. On a year-to-date basis, the TEB adjustment was $288 million, compared with $242 million in the same period last year.

The Bank securitizes retail loans and receivables, and records a gain or loss on sale, including the setup of an asset related to the retained interests. Credit losses incurred on retained interests subsequent to securitization are recorded as a charge to other income in the Bank’s consolidated financial statements. For segment reporting, the provision for credit losses (PCL) related to securitized volumes is included in the Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking segment but is reversed in the Corporate segment and reclassified as a charge to other income to comply with GAAP.

Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking

Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking net income for the quarter was $589 million, an increase of $7 million, or 1%, compared with the second quarter last year, and an increase of $5 million, or 1%, compared with the prior quarter. The annualized return on invested capital for the quarter was 28% compared to 29% in the second quarter last year and 27% in the prior quarter. Net income for the six months ended April 30, 2009 was $1,173 million, a decrease of $7 million, or 1%, compared with the same period last year. On a year-to-date basis the annualized return on invested capital was 27% compared to 29% for the same period last year.

Revenue for the quarter was $2,276 million, an increase of $142 million, or 7%, compared with the second quarter last year primarily due to strong volume growth across most banking products, particularly personal and business deposits, and real-estate secured lending. Inclusion of revenue from the U.S. insurance and credit card businesses since the third quarter of 2008 also contributed to the growth. Revenue decreased by $16 million, or 1%, compared with the prior quarter mainly due to fewer calendar days in the current quarter. Revenues this quarter benefited from continued strong volume growth and from margin improvement, largely offset by an adjustment related to the cost of Visa travel reward points and higher loss ratios in the insurance business. The latter was partly offset by gains due to a change in the insurance liabilities discount rate. Revenue on a year-to-date basis was $4,568 million, up $287 million, or 7%, compared with the same period last year. Margin on average earning assets decreased by 2 bps from 2.96% to 2.94% compared with the second quarter last year, but was up 12 bps compared with the prior quarter due to wider real estate secured lending margins, partially offset by narrower margins in term and business deposits. The margin on average earning assets on a year-to-date basis decreased by 9 bps to 2.88% when compared with the same period last year. Compared with the second quarter last year, personal deposits volume grew by $18.1 billion or 16.9%; real- estate secured lending volume (including securitizations) grew by $17.1 billion or 11.9%; and consumer loan volume grew by $2.4 billion or 13.5%. Business deposit volume increased by $6.6 billion, or 16.2%, and business loans and acceptances volume grew by $1.9 billion or 6.9%. Gross originated insurance premiums grew by $48 million or 8%.

PCL for the quarter was $286 million, an increase of $95 million, or 50%, compared with the second quarter last year. Personal banking PCL of $260 million was $85 million, or 49%, higher than the second quarter last year as deteriorating economic conditions led to higher provisions in unsecured lines of credit and credit cards. Business banking PCL was $26 million for the quarter, compared with $16 million in the second quarter last year. Annualized PCL as a percentage of credit volume was 0.54%, an increase of 15 bps, compared with the second quarter last year. PCL increased by $20 million, or 8%, compared with the prior quarter. Personal banking provisions increased $15 million, or 6%, compared with the prior quarter primarily due to higher bankruptcies. Business banking provisions increased by $5 million, compared with the prior quarter. PCL on a year-to-date basis was $552 million, an increase of $189 million, or 52%, compared with the same period last year. Personal banking provisions were $505 million, up $164 million, or 48%, and business banking provisions were $47 million, up $25 million, or 114%.

Non-interest expenses for the quarter were $1,143 million, an increase of $48 million, or 4%, compared with the second quarter last year, but a decrease of $43 million, or 4%, compared to the prior quarter. Non-interest expenses on a year-to-date basis were $2,329 million, an increase of $138 million, or 6%, compared with the same period last year. Primary drivers of the year-over-year and year-to-date expense growth were higher employee compensation and inclusion of the U.S. insurance and credit card businesses. The decrease from the prior quarter was mainly due to fewer calendar days in the quarter and lower litigation costs. The average full time equivalent (FTE) staffing levels increased by 722, or 2%, compared with the second quarter last year and decreased by 182, or 1%, compared with the prior quarter. FTE staffing levels on a year-to-date basis increased by 726, or 2%, compared with the same period last year. The efficiency ratio for the current quarter was 50.2%, compared with 51.3% in the second quarter last year and 51.7% in the prior quarter. The efficiency ratio on a year-to-date basis was 51.0%, compared with 51.2% in the same period last year.

Business activity continues to be vulnerable to economic pressures. The outlook is for revenue growth to moderate in 2009 as volume growth slows in deposits. Revenue growth should continue to benefit from our leadership position in branch hours and continued new branch and marketing investments, as well as improved customer cross-sell and productivity improvements. PCL rates are expected to continue to reflect conditions in the Canadian economy. We anticipate that expenses will be higher relative to last year due to continued investments in new branches, higher employee compensation and benefit costs, and the inclusion of the U.S. insurance and credit card businesses.

Wealth Management

Wealth Management net income for the second quarter was $126 million, a decrease of $56 million, or 31%, compared with the second quarter last year, and a decrease of $26 million, or 17%, compared with the prior quarter. Net income in Global Wealth Management, which excludes TD Ameritrade, was $78 million, a decrease of $37 million, or 32%, compared with the second quarter last year, and an increase of $3 million, or 4%, compared with the prior quarter. The decline in net income from last year was driven by market declines in assets under management and assets under administration in mutual funds and advice-based businesses, lower average fees earned in mutual funds and net interest margin compression. This was partially offset by continued strength in trading volumes in our online brokerage business. The Bank’s reported investment in TD Ameritrade generated net income of $48 million, a decrease of $19 million, or 28%, compared with the second quarter last year and a decrease of $29 million, or 38%, compared with the prior quarter. TD Ameritrade experienced lower interest income due to net interest margin compression which was partially offset by continued increases in trading volumes and asset growth. For its second quarter ended March 31, 2009, TD Ameritrade reported net income of US$132 million, a decrease of $55 million, or 29%, compared with its second quarter last year and a decrease of $52 million, or 28%, compared with its prior quarter. Wealth Management’s annualized return on invested capital for the quarter was 11% compared to 19% in the second quarter last year and 13% in the prior quarter.

Net income for the six months ended April 30, 2009 was $278 million, a decrease of $120 million, or 30%, compared with the same period last year. The decrease in net income included results from the Bank’s investment in TD Ameritrade, which generated $125 million of net income compared with $155 million in the same period last year. Annualized return on invested capital on a year-to-date basis was 12%, compared to 21% in same period last year.

Revenue for the quarter was $528 million, which decreased by $30 million, or 5%, compared with the second quarter last year. The decrease was primarily due to lower revenues in mutual funds and advice-based businesses driven by lower assets under management and assets under administration, lower average fees, lower interest income due to net interest margin compression and lower margin loans. This was partially offset by strong trading volumes in our online brokerage business and the inclusion of the U.S. wealth management businesses effective the third quarter of 2008. Revenue remained flat compared with the prior quarter, primarily due to increased trading volumes in online brokerage and modest increases in assets offset by net interest margin compression, lower commissions per trade in online brokerage and lower average fees in mutual funds. Revenue on a year-to-date basis was $1,056 million, which decreased $72 million, or 6%, compared with the same period last year primarily due to lower revenues in mutual funds and advice-based businesses driven by lower assets under management and assets under administration, lower average fees and net interest margin compression, partially offset by higher trade volumes in online brokerage, increased new issues revenue and the inclusion of the U.S. wealth management businesses.

Non-interest expenses for the quarter were $414 million, an increase of $27 million, or 7%, compared with the second quarter last year, and a decrease of $5 million, or 1%, compared with the prior quarter. The increase from the second quarter of last year was primarily due to the inclusion of U.S. wealth management businesses and continued investment in the business, partially offset by lower variable expenses. The decrease compared with the previous quarter is primarily due to lower variable expenses and prudent expense management, partially offset by higher volume-related expenses. Non-interest expenses on a year-to-date basis were $833 million, an increase of $67 million, or 9%, compared with the same period last year. This increase was mainly due to the inclusion of U.S. wealth management businesses, the continued investment in growing the sales force in our advice-based businesses and related support staff, partially offset by lower variable expenses and prudent expense management.

The average FTE staffing levels increased by 782, or 13%, compared with the second quarter last year primarily due to the inclusion of 562 FTE from the U.S. wealth management businesses, new client-facing advisors and increased temporary processing staff to handle higher volumes. The increase of 127, or 2%, compared with the prior quarter was mainly due to new client- facing advisors and increased temporary processing staff to handle higher volumes. FTE staffing levels on a year-to-date basis increased by 713, or 12%, compared with the same period last year for the same reasons. The efficiency ratio for the current quarter was 78.4%, compared with 69.4% in the second quarter last year and 79.4% in the prior quarter. The efficiency ratio on a year-to-date basis was 78.9%, compared with 67.9% in the same period last year.

Assets under management of $168 billion at April 30, 2009 decreased by $2 billion, or 1%, from October 31, 2008, as the addition of net new client assets was more than offset by market declines. Assets under administration of $174 billion were flat compared with October 31, 2008, as market declines were offset by the addition of net new client assets.

We anticipate that current capital market and economic challenges in this low interest rate environment will continue to impact our results over the next few quarters. However, client engagement remains strong as evidenced by growth in new accounts and net new client assets. We will continue to manage expenses prudently while continuing our focused investment in client-facing advisors, products and technology to ensure future business growth.

Wealth Management
————————————————————————-
For the six
For the three months ended        months ended
————————————————–
(millions of             Apr. 30   Jan. 31   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
Canadian dollars)          2009      2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Global Wealth(1)             $78       $75      $115      $153      $243
TD Ameritrade                 48        77        67       125       155
————————————————————————-
Net income                  $126      $152      $182      $278      $398
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1) Effective the third quarter of 2008, the Bank transferred the U.S.
wealth management businesses to the Wealth Management segment for
management reporting purposes. Prior periods have not been
reclassified as the impact was not material to segment results.

TD AMERITRADE Holding Corporation

As at April 30, 2009, the Bank’s reported investment in TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation (TD Ameritrade) was 47.5% of the issued and outstanding shares of TD Ameritrade.

On February 18, 2009, TD Ameritrade announced a common stock repurchase program for an aggregate 34 million shares from its second largest shareholder. As a result of TD Ameritrade’s share repurchase activity, the Bank’s ownership position in TD Ameritrade increased to 47.5% as at April 30, 2009 from 44.9% as at January 31, 2009. This level of ownership interest is expected to be temporary as TD Ameritrade has announced that it plans to issue shares in connection with its acquisition of thinkorswim Group Inc. Upon completion of the issuance, the Bank intends to conduct additional sales as required to bring its ownership interest under the cap of 45% under the Stockholders’ Agreement.

On March 2, 2009, the Bank took delivery of 27 million shares in settlement of its amended hedging arrangement with Lillooet Limited (Lillooet) at a hedged cost to the Bank of US$515 million. As Lillooet was consolidated in the Bank’s consolidated financial statements, the replacement of the amended hedge arrangement with the direct ownership of the 27 million shares had no material impact on the Bank.

The condensed financial statements of TD AMERITRADE Holding Corporation, based on its consolidated financial statements filed with the SEC, are provided as follows:

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
————————————————————————-
As at
——————–
Mar. 31,  Sep. 30,
(millions of U.S. dollars)                                2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Assets
Receivable from brokers, dealers and
clearing organizations                                 $2,079    $4,177
Receivable from clients, net of allowance
for doubtful accounts                                   3,469     6,934
Other assets                                             7,566     4,841
————————————————————————-
Total assets                                           $13,114   $15,952
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
Liabilities
Payable to brokers, dealers and clearing
organizations                                          $2,390    $5,770
Payable to clients                                       5,706     5,071
Other liabilities                                        2,234     2,186
————————————————————————-
Total liabilities                                       10,330    13,027
————————————————————————-
Stockholders’ equity                                     2,784     2,925
————————————————————————-
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity             $13,114   $15,952
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income
————————————————————————-
For the three         For the six
months ended        months ended
—————————————-
(millions of U.S. dollars,         Mar. 31   Mar. 31   Mar. 31   Mar. 31
except per share amounts)            2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Revenues
Net interest revenue                   $67      $138      $152      $287
Fee-based and other revenue            458       485       984       978
————————————————————————-
Total revenue                          525       623     1,136     1,265
————————————————————————-
Expenses
Employee compensation and benefits     121       132       238       238
Other                                  180       191       373       371
————————————————————————-
Total expenses                         301       323       611       609
————————————————————————-
Other income                             -         -         -         1
————————————————————————-
Pre-tax income                         224       300       525       657
Provision for income taxes              92       113       209       229
————————————————————————-
Net income(1)                         $132      $187      $316      $428
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
Earnings per share – basic           $0.23     $0.31     $0.54     $0.72
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
Earning per share – diluted          $0.23     $0.31     $0.54     $0.71
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1) The Bank’s equity share of net income of TD Ameritrade is subject to
adjustments relating to amortization of intangibles.

U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking

As described in the “How the Bank Reports” section, effective this quarter the reporting periods of all units within U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking are now aligned with the Bank. Previously, the results for TD Banknorth and Commerce were reported on a one month lag. The results for this quarter represent the three months ended April 30, 2009. Net income of TD Banknorth and Commerce for January 2009 has been excluded from the results of U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking in this quarter.

U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking reported net income for the second quarter was $231 million, an increase of $131 million, or 131%, compared with the second quarter last year, and a slight decrease of $9 million, or 4%, compared with the prior quarter. Excluding restructuring and integration charges related to the Commerce acquisition, adjusted net income for the quarter was $281 million, an increase of $151 million, or 116%, compared with the second quarter last year, and a decrease of $26 million, or 8%, compared with the prior quarter. Much of the increase over the second quarter last year related to the earnings from Commerce since its acquisition on March 31, 2008. The annualized return on invested capital for the quarter was 5.3%, compared with 5.8% in the second quarter last year and 5.9% in the prior quarter.

Reported net income for the six months ended April 30, 2009 was $471 million, an increase of $244 million, or 107%, compared with the same period last year, while adjusted net income was $588 million, an increase of $331 million, or 129%, compared with the same period last year. This increase was primarily due to the earnings from Commerce since its acquisition. The annualized return on invested capital on a year-to-date basis was 5.6%, compared with 5.8% in the same period last year.

Revenue for the quarter was $1,281 million, an increase of $806 million, or 170%, compared with the second quarter last year, principally due to the Commerce acquisition and the translation effect of a weaker Canadian dollar. Revenue increased by $87 million, or 7%, over the prior quarter, partially due to the translation effect of a weaker Canadian dollar. In U.S. dollar terms, revenue increased 4% due to strong loan and deposit growth. Revenue on a year-to-date basis was $2,475 million, representing an increase of $1,548 million, or 167% (116% in U.S. dollar terms), compared with the same period last year, primarily due to the factors stated above. The margin on average earning assets of 3.58% decreased by 15 bps from the second quarter last year and decreased by 4 bps from the prior quarter. The slight decrease over the prior quarter is primarily due to lower spreads on deposits, partially offset by the benefit of increased prepayment rates on loans and securities. Margin on average earning assets on a year-to-date basis decreased by 21 bps from 3.81% to 3.60%, compared with the same period last year. In U.S. dollar terms, average loans grew by 3% and deposits grew by 5% over the prior quarter. The available-for-sale (AFS) securities portfolio totalled approximately $56 billion (US$47 billion) for the quarter, including a net unrealized loss of approximately $1.2 billion after tax (US$1.0 billion). A significant amount of this unrealized loss is attributed to the current lack of liquidity in financial markets, and we continue to monitor our position as market conditions change and we update our valuation models as new data becomes available. Compared with the prior quarter, the after-tax unrealized loss declined by $985 million, of which $226 million related to non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations.

PCL for the quarter was $201 million, an increase of $155 million, or 337%, compared with the second quarter last year and an increase of $62 million, or 45%, over the prior quarter. The PCL increases were largely due to higher levels of charge-offs and reserve increases resulting from loan risk rating downgrades, principally in commercial real estate. Net impaired loans totalled $688 million, an increase of $415 million, or 152%, over the second quarter of last year and an increase of $124 million, or 22%, from the prior quarter. The increase was largely due to net new formations resulting from continued weakness in the real estate markets and the recession in the U.S. Net impaired loans as a percentage of total loans and leases were 1.12%, compared with 0.59% as at the end of the second quarter last year and 0.92% at the end of the prior quarter. PCL on a year-to-date basis was $340 million, which increased by $268 million, or 372%, compared with the same period last year, primarily due to reasons listed above for the quarter.

Reported non-interest expenses for the quarter were $823 million, an increase of $529 million, or 180%, compared with the second quarter last year and an increase of $22 million, or 3%, compared with the prior quarter. Adjusted non-interest expenses for the quarter were $744 million, an increase of $498 million, or 202%, compared with the second quarter last year and an increase of $49 million, or 7%, compared with the prior quarter. Primary drivers of the expense growth over the prior year were the acquired Commerce franchise and the translation effect of a weaker Canadian dollar. The increase over the prior quarter was due to higher Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) deposit insurance premiums which increased for all banks in the U.S. effective January 1, 2009, and timing of employee benefit costs. Reported non-interest expenses on a year-to-date basis were $1,624 million which increased by $1,092 million, or 205%, compared with the same period last year. Adjusted non-interest expenses on a year-to-date basis were $1,439 million which increased by $955 million, or 197%, compared with the same period last year, primarily due to the Commerce acquisition and the translation effect of the weaker Canadian dollar. While staffing levels were significantly higher than in the second quarter of last year due to the Commerce acquisition, the average FTE staffing level declined by approximately 2% (excluding new store openings) since the acquisition of Commerce, primarily due to staff reductions related to integration efforts and branch consolidations. In fiscal 2009, 24 new stores have been opened compared with 13 in the April to September 2008 period representing the first six months of ownership of the Commerce franchise. The reported efficiency ratio for the quarter was 64.2%, compared with 61.9% in the second quarter last year and 67.1% in the prior quarter. The adjusted efficiency ratio for the quarter was 58.2%, compared with 51.7% in the second quarter last year and 58.2% in the prior quarter. The reported and adjusted efficiency ratios on a year-to-date basis were 65.6% and 58.1% respectively, compared with 57.4% and 52.2% respectively in the same period last year.

The banking environment in the U.S. is expected to remain challenging, and there remains uncertainty as to the continuing effects of the ongoing market issues related to the recession in the U.S. On May 22, 2009, the FDIC, in the U.S., finalized a five bps special assessment charge based on total assets less Tier 1 capital of an institution insured under the FDIC program as at June 30, 2009. The special assessment charge, of approximately US$50 million, is payable by the Bank on September 30, 2009. The final rule adopted also provides the FDIC authority to charge similar special assessments on December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010, if needed, subject to additional FDIC Board approval at that time. We expect that the weak economy will continue to result in higher than normal PCLs and lower loan growth; however, the translation effect of the weaker Canadian dollar, attainment of synergies and strong expense control should help offset these.

Wholesale Banking

Wholesale Banking net income for the quarter was $173 million, an increase of $80 million, or 86%, compared with the second quarter of last year, primarily driven by strong interest rate and foreign exchange trading revenue and an increase in client activity, partially offset by significant realized net security losses in the public equity investment portfolio (Head Office Portfolio). Net income decreased by $92 million, or 35%, compared with prior quarter primarily due to lower trading revenue. The annualized return on invested capital for the quarter was 18% compared with 11% in the second quarter of last year and 22% in the prior quarter.

Net income for the six months ended April 30, 2009 was $438 million, an increase of $182 million, or 71%, compared with the same period last year. The annualized return on invested capital on a year-to-date basis was 20%, compared to 16% for the same period last year.

Wholesale Banking revenue was derived primarily from capital markets, investing and corporate lending activities. Revenue for the quarter was $620 million, an increase of $192 million, or 45%, compared with the second quarter last year and a decrease of $219 million, or 26%, compared with the prior quarter. Capital markets revenue increased from the second quarter last year primarily due to very strong interest rate and foreign exchange revenues, an increase in underwriting and equity commission revenues, and higher energy trading revenue. Strong interest rate and foreign exchange trading was mainly driven by an increase in customer flows, wider spreads, and favourable trading results. Underwriting and equity commission revenues increase was driven by higher capital market activity. Energy trading revenue increased primarily due to higher client-related transaction revenues and good trading results. Effective August 1, 2008, Wholesale Banking reclassified certain debt securities in its credit trading business from trading to AFS. The AFS portfolio generated a small, positive contribution in the second quarter driven mainly by net spread earned on the portfolio. While the portfolio had securities losses related to defaults by four bond issuers during the quarter, these losses were fully offset by gains on credit protection held. Revenue declined from the prior quarter primarily due to lower interest rate and foreign exchange trading revenue coming off a record quarter and lower client-driven equity transaction revenues, partially offset by higher credit and energy trading revenues. The prior quarter also included a recovery from the cancellation of a loan commitment. Earlier this year, Wholesale Banking made a strategic decision to exit its public equity investment portfolio. Approximately two thirds of the portfolio was sold during the quarter which led to significant realized security losses. The public equity investment portfolio generated net security gains in the same quarter last year and moderately lower net security losses in the prior quarter. Corporate lending revenues increased compared with the second quarter last year and the prior quarter primarily due to higher margins. Revenue on a year-to-date basis was $1,459 million, an increase of $423 million, or 41% compared with the same period last year primarily due to strong trading revenues and an increase in fee revenues related to higher client activity, partially offset by significant realized net security losses in the public equity investment portfolio.

PCL is composed of specific provisions for credit losses and accrual costs for credit protection. PCL for the quarter was $59 million, compared with $10 million in the second quarter of last year and $66 million in the prior quarter. The provision for the quarter included a specific allowance of $48 million related to one credit exposure in the corporate lending portfolio and the cost of credit protection. The provision for the second quarter last year reflected the cost of credit protection. The provision for the prior quarter included specific allowances of $56 million related to credit exposures in the corporate lending and merchant banking portfolios and the cost of credit protection. PCL on a year-to-date basis was $125 million, an increase of $59 million, or 89%, compared with the same period last year. Wholesale Banking continues to actively manage the credit risk in the corporate loan portfolio and currently holds $2.4 billion in notional credit default swap (CDS) protection.

Non-interest expenses for the quarter were $356 million, an increase of $65 million, or 22%, compared with the second quarter of last year due primarily to higher variable compensation on stronger results, higher severance and investment in control and risk initiatives. Non-interest expenses decreased $32 million, or 8%, from the prior quarter primarily due to lower variable compensation and severance costs. Non-interest expenses on a year-to-date basis were $744 million, an increase of $132 million, or 22%, compared with the same period last year, primarily due to higher variable compensation and severance costs.

Overall, the Wholesale Bank had a very strong quarter. Our integrated, client focused franchise strategy for TD Securities generated strong results. In addition, the continued focus on strategic use of capital resulted in a significant reduction in risk weighted assets. Wholesale Banking continued to make good progress in reducing credit trading positions outside North America and total exposures are down significantly from the end of last year. There was also significant progress made with our decision to exit from the public equity investment portfolio which we expect to be substantially complete in the third quarter. While Wholesale had strong first half results, we do not expect this run rate to continue for the second half. We expect the operating environment to remain volatile and challenging which may lead to lower trading revenues, additional PCL and further investment security write-downs. Key priorities for 2009 include solidifying our position as a top-three dealer in Canada, growing our client driven franchise businesses and completing the repositioning of the credit trading business.

Corporate

Corporate segment’s reported net loss for the quarter was $501 million, compared with a reported net loss of $105 million in the second quarter last year and a reported net loss of $529 million in the prior quarter. The adjusted net loss for the quarter was $80 million, an increase in net loss of $66 million compared with the second quarter last year and a decrease in net loss of $79 million from the previous quarter. Compared with the second quarter last year, the higher adjusted net loss was driven by an increase in unallocated corporate expenses, decreased revenues and a non-recurring tax benefit reported last year, which were partially offset by net gains from securitization and net income from other treasury activities. Compared with the previous quarter, the lower adjusted net loss was primarily attributable to an increase in net securitization gains, higher net income from other treasury activities and lower costs related to corporate financing activity that were partially offset by the impact of unallocated corporate expenses and decreased revenues in the current quarter.

The reported net loss for the six months ended April 30, 2009 was $1,030 million compared with a net loss of $239 million in the same period last year. The adjusted net loss on a year-to-date basis was $239 million, an increase in net loss of $181 million compared with last year and was primarily attributable to a non-recurring tax benefit reported last year, retail hedging activities, costs associated with corporate financing activity and higher unallocated corporate items.

The difference between reported and adjusted net loss for the Corporate segment was due to items of note as outlined below. These items are described more fully on page 6.

————————————————————————-
For the six
For the three months ended        months ended
————————————————–
(millions of             Apr. 30   Jan. 31   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
Canadian dollars)          2009      2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Corporate segment net
loss – reported           $(501)    $(529)    $(105)  $(1,030)    $(239)
————————————————————————-
Items of note affecting
net loss, net of
income taxes:
Amortization of
intangibles               127       127        92       254       167
Change in fair value
of derivatives hedging
the reclassified
available-for-sale
securities portfolio      134       200         -       334         -
Change in fair value of
credit default swaps
hedging the corporate
loan book, net of
provision for credit
losses                     44       (12)       (1)       32       (26)
Other tax items              -         -         -         -        20
Provision for insurance
claims                      -         -         -         -        20
General allowance
increase in Canadian
Personal and Commercial
Banking (excluding VFC)
and Wholesale Banking      77        55         -       132         -
Settlement of TD
Banknorth shareholder
litigation                 39         -         -        39         -
————————————————————————-
Total items of note          421       370        91       791       181
————————————————————————-
Corporate segment net
loss – adjusted            $(80)    $(159)     $(14)    $(239)     $(58)
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

Decomposition of items
included in net loss -
adjusted
Net securitization            40       (33)       (1)        7       (14)
Unallocated Corporate
expenses                    (69)      (60)      (43)     (129)     (108)
Other                        (51)      (66)       30      (117)       64
————————————————————————-
Corporate segment net
loss – adjusted            $(80)    $(159)     $(14)    $(239)     $(58)
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

BALANCE SHEET REVIEW

Total assets of the Bank were $575 billion as at April 30, 2009, $12 billion, or 2%, higher than at October 31, 2008. The net increase reflected a $25 billion increase in securities and a $10 billion increase in loans (net of allowance for loan losses), partially offset by an $11 billion decrease in securities purchased under reverse repurchase agreements, an $8 billion decrease in other assets and a $5 billion decrease in interest-bearing deposits with other banks. Translation effect of the weaker Canadian dollar caused the value of assets in our U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking segment to increase by $16 billion; the impact of this growth and higher business volumes in the U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking segment were more than offset by lower balances in our Wholesale Banking segment.

Securities increased largely due to a $21 billion increase in AFS securities primarily related to growth in the U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking segment due to reinvestment of balances previously invested in securities purchased under reverse repurchase agreements, Canadian dollar translation impact of $6 billion and business growth.

Loans (net of allowance for loan losses) increased by $10 billion due to the translation effect of the weaker Canadian dollar and volume growth primarily in the Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking and U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking segments. Consumer installment and other personal loans increased by $7 billion, business and government loans in U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking increased by $7 billion while residential mortgages in Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking decreased by $6 billion due to an increase in securitization activity.

Other assets declined by $8 billion due to a $9 billion decrease in the market value of derivatives primarily in Wholesale Banking; offset partially by a $2 billion increase in goodwill primarily due to foreign exchange adjustments relating to previous U.S. acquisitions.

Total liabilities of the Bank were $535 billion as at April 30, 2009, $4 billion, or 1%, higher than at October 31, 2008. The net increase was composed primarily of a $26 billion increase in total deposits and a $23 billion decrease in other liabilities. Translation effect of the weaker Canadian dollar caused the value of liabilities in U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking to increase by $14 billion; the impact of this growth and higher business volumes in this segment were more than offset by lower balances in our Wholesale Banking segment.

Deposits increased $26 billion, or 7%, primarily due to a $23 billion increase in personal deposits driven by the translation effect of the weaker Canadian dollar in the U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking segment and volume increases in the Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking and U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking segments; a $3 billion increase in business and government deposits, primarily driven by volume increases in the Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking and U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking segments which were offset by decreases in Wholesale Banking volumes.

Other liabilities decreased $23 billion, or 16%, due to a $12 billion decrease in obligations related to securities sold under repurchase agreements in Wholesale Banking, a $6 billion increase in Wholesale Banking derivatives due to volatility in currency and interest rate markets and a $5 billion decrease in obligations related to securities sold short.

Common shares and preferred shares increased $3 billion year-to-date, primarily due to the new share issuances of $1.4 billion and $1.5 billion, respectively.

CREDIT PORTFOLIO QUALITY

Gross impaired loans were $1,875 million at April 30, 2009, $718 million higher than at October 31, 2008, largely attributable to a $442 million increase in U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking (of which approximately $116 million was the foreign exchange effect), a $133 million increase in personal impaired loans in Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking, and a $104 million increase in Wholesale Banking.

Net impaired loans as at April 30, 2009, after deducting specific allowances, totalled $1,358 million, compared with $805 million as at October 31, 2008.

The allowance for credit losses of $2,178 million as at April 30, 2009 was comprised of total specific allowances of $517 million and a general allowance of $1,661 million. Specific allowances increased by $165 million from October 31, 2008. The total general allowance as at April 30, 2009 was up by $477 million, compared with October 31, 2008, mainly due to a $190 million increase in the general allowance for the Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking (excluding VFC) and Wholesale Banking segments, and increases in allowance related to the U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking segment. The Bank establishes general allowances to recognize losses that management estimates to have occurred in the portfolio at the balance sheet date for loans or credits not yet specifically identified as impaired.

Changes in Gross Impaired Loans and Acceptances
————————————————————————-
For the six
For the three months ended        months ended
————————————————–
(millions of             Apr. 30   Oct. 31   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
Canadian dollars)          2009      2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Balance at beginning
of period                $1,543    $1,001      $818    $1,157      $569
Impact due to reporting-
period alignment of
U.S. entities(1)             57         -         -        57         -
Additions                    927       616       575     1,917     1,234
Return to performing
status, repaid or sold     (294)     (243)     (234)     (591)     (431)
Write-offs                  (334)     (247)     (258)     (707)     (470)
Foreign exchange and
other adjustments           (24)       30         8        42         7
————————————————————————-
Balance at end of period  $1,875    $1,157      $909    $1,875      $909
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

Allowance for Credit Losses
————————————————————————-
As at
——————————
Apr. 30   Oct. 31   Apr. 30
(millions of Canadian dollars)                  2009      2008      2008
————————————————————————-
Specific allowance – on-balance sheet loans     $517      $352      $255
————————————————————————-
General allowance for – on-balance sheet
loans                 1,399     1,184     1,114
- off-balance sheet
instruments(2)          262         -         -
————————————————————————-
Total general allowance                        1,661     1,184     1,114
————————————————————————-
Allowance for credit losses                   $2,178    $1,536    $1,369
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

Impaired loans net of specific allowance      $1,358      $805      $654
Net impaired loans as a percentage of net
loans                                          0.6%      0.3%      0.3%
Provision for credit losses as a percentage
of net average loans (quarterly ratio)        1.12%     0.49%     0.48%
————————————————————————-
(1) As a result of the reporting-period alignment of U.S. entities as
described in the “How the Bank Reports” section, the impact on gross
impaired loans for January 2009 comprised of additions to impaired
loans of $153 million; return to performing status, repaid or sold of
$66 million; write-offs of $35 million; and foreign exchange and
other adjustments of $5 million.
(2) Effective April 30, 2009, the allowance for credit losses for
off-balance sheet instruments is recorded in other liabilities. Prior
period balances have not been reclassified.

Non-prime Loans

As at April 30, 2009, VFC had approximately $1.3 billion (October 31, 2008: $1.2 billion) gross exposure to non-prime loans which mainly consist of automotive loans originated in Canada. The credit loss rate, defined as the average PCL divided by the average month-end loan balance, which is an indicator of credit quality, is approximately 6% (October 31, 2008: approximately 6%) on an annual basis. The portfolio continues to perform as expected. These loans are recorded at amortized cost.

SECURITIES PORTFOLIO

Exposure to Non-Agency Collateralized Mortgage Obligation (CMO)

As at April 30, 2009, the amortized cost of the non-agency CMOs held by the Bank was US$8.1 billion ($9.7 billion), compared with US$8.7 billion ($9.3 billion) as at October 31, 2008. These securities are collateralized primarily by Alt-A and Prime Jumbo mortgages most of which are prepayable, fixed-rate mortgages without rate reset features. At the acquisition date, this portfolio was recorded at fair value and classified as available-for-sale. The fair value at acquisition became the new cost basis for these securities. See Note 31 to the 2008 Consolidated Financial Statements for more details. At the time of the acquisition and at the end of the third quarter of 2008, the CMO portfolio was recognized at fair value using broker quotes. The liquidity in the market for these securities has decreased since then, and the market has become inactive. The trading volume for these securities has declined significantly relative to historical levels. There has been a significant widening of the bid-ask spread and there are only a small number of bidders for these securities in the market. Determination of whether a market is inactive requires judgement, and the above factors are indicators of an inactive market. In current markets, the broker quotes cannot be considered as a primary source of valuation. Subsequent to the third quarter of 2008, the Bank fair valued these securities using a valuation technique which maximizes the use of observable inputs including broker quotes. The valuation technique uses assumptions a market participant would use in valuing these securities. The valuation model determines the fair value by discounting the expected cash flows using a risk-adjusted interest rate curve that incorporates a liquidity premium derived from various indices observable in the active market. The broker quotes for securities in the portfolio are another input to the valuation model. The contractual cash flows are adjusted for expected prepayments and credit losses to determine the expected cash flows.

During the quarter, the Bank re-securitized a portion of the non-agency CMO securities portfolio. As part of the on-balance sheet re-securitization, new credit ratings were obtained for the re-securitized securities that better reflect the discount on acquisition and the Bank’s risk inherent on the entire portfolio. As a result, 80% of the non-agency CMO securities are now rated AAA for regulatory capital reporting. The net capital benefit of the re-securitization transaction is reflected in the changes in risk-weighted assets and in the securitization deductions from Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital. For accounting purposes, the Bank retained a majority of the beneficial interests in the re-securitized securities resulting in no financial statement impact. The Bank’s assessment of an other-than-temporary impairment for these securities is not impacted by the change in the credit ratings.

The fair value of the portfolio as at April 30, 2009 was US$6.9 billion ($8.2 billion). The decline in fair value of the non-agency CMO portfolio was not considered to be an other-than-temporary impairment and therefore, an impairment loss was not recognized. Determination of whether an other-than-temporary impairment exists requires judgement. The decline in the fair value of these securities subsequent to acquisition was mainly due to the current liquidity crisis in the market. An other-than-temporary impairment is recognized for these securities when the fair value is significantly below the cost for a prolonged period of time with no expectation of recovery by maturity. The Bank continues to validate its view on the expected credit loss by assessing the inputs, such as the projected default rate, the loss given default rate and housing price decline used in the determination of the expected credit loss. The Bank’s view on the expected credit loss on these securities determined on acquisition has not changed. The following table discloses the fair value of the securities by vintage year:

Non-Agency Alt-A and Prime Jumbo CMO Securities by Vintage Year
————————————————————————-
As at Apr. 30, 2009
————————————————————-
Alt-A         Prime Jumbo               Total
(millions   ————————————————————-
of U.S.     Amortized      Fair Amortized      Fair Amortized      Fair
dollars)         cost     value      cost     value      cost     value
————————————————————————-
2003              $418      $388      $715      $658    $1,133    $1,046
2004               696       619       818       763     1,514     1,382
2005               956       750     1,877     1,635     2,833     2,385
2006               535       377       733       606     1,268       983
2007               794       594       579       493     1,373     1,087
————————————————————————-
Total
securities(1)  $3,399    $2,728    $4,722    $4,155    $8,121    $6,883
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

As at Oct. 31, 2008
————————————————————-
Alt-A         Prime Jumbo               Total
(millions   ————————————————————-
of U.S.     Amortized      Fair Amortized      Fair Amortized      Fair
dollars)         cost     value      cost     value      cost     value
————————————————————————-
2003              $423      $360      $775      $664    $1,198    $1,024
2004               759       626       972       850     1,731     1,476
2005               979       787     2,031     1,711     3,010     2,498
2006               549       429       819       656     1,368     1,085
2007               818       644       587       478     1,405     1,122
————————————————————————-
Total
securities     $3,528    $2,846    $5,184    $4,359    $8,712    $7,205
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1) These securities are mainly investment grade with ratings of BBB and
above for accounting purposes and do not reflect the
re-securitization transaction.

CAPITAL POSITION

The Bank’s capital ratios are calculated using the guidelines of the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada (OSFI), which are based under the “International Convergence on Capital Measurement and Capital Standards – A Revised Framework” (Basel II) issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Effective April 30, 2009, for accounting purposes, and effective October 31, 2008 for regulatory reporting purposes, the one month lag in reporting of TD Banknorth and Commerce financial position and results was eliminated by using the same period end as the rest of the Bank. Prior to October 31, 2008, regulatory capital was calculated incorporating TD Banknorth and Commerce on a one month lag. Further, effective October 31, 2008, for regulatory purposes only, the Bank’s investment in TD Ameritrade is translated using the period end foreign exchange rate of the Bank.

Under Basel II, risk-weighted assets (RWA) are calculated for each of credit risk, market risk and operational risk, as shown below:

Risk-Weighted Assets
————————————————————————-
As at
——————————
Apr. 30,  Oct. 31,  Apr. 30,
(millions of Canadian dollars)                  2009      2008      2008
————————————————————————-
Risk-weighted assets for:
Credit risk                               $167,836  $177,552  $147,617
Market risk                                  7,737     9,644     7,140
Operational risk                            24,172    24,554    23,878
————————————————————————-
Total risk-weighted assets                  $199,745  $211,750  $178,635
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

OSFI’s target Tier 1 and Total capital ratios for Canadian banks are 7% and 10%, respectively. Effective November 1, 2008, substantial investments held prior to January 1, 2007, which were previously deducted from Tier 2 capital, are deducted 50% from Tier 1 capital and 50% from Tier 2 capital. Insurance subsidiaries continue to be deconsolidated and reported as a deduction from Tier 2 capital.

As at April 30, 2009, the Bank’s Tier 1 capital ratio was 10.9%, compared with 9.8% as at October 31, 2008. The increase was primarily a result of capital issuances, including common shares, preferred shares and innovative Tier 1 capital securities and a decline in RWA, largely in Wholesale Banking, partially offset by the 50/50 deduction discussed above. The Total capital ratio was 14.1% as at April 30, 2009, compared with 12.0% as at October 31, 2008. The increase was largely due to lower RWA and capital issuances.

The Bank continues to hold sufficient capital levels to ensure that flexibility is maintained to grow operations, both organically and through strategic acquisitions. The strong capital ratios are the result of the Bank’s internal capital generation, management of the balance sheet and periodic issuance of capital securities.

For further details of equity and preferred share issuances, see Notes 5, 6 and 8 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements. For further details of regulatory capital, see Note 9 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

MANAGING RISK

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Financial services involve prudently taking risks in order to generate profitable growth. At the Bank, our goal is to earn a stable and sustainable rate of return for every dollar of risk we take, while putting significant emphasis on investing in our businesses to ensure we can meet our future growth objectives. Our businesses thoroughly examine the various risks to which they are exposed and assess the impact and likelihood of those risks. We respond by developing business and risk management strategies for our various business units, taking into consideration the risks and business environment in which we operate. Through our businesses and operations, we are exposed to a broad number of risks that have been identified and defined in our Enterprise Risk Framework. This framework outlines appropriate risk oversight processes and the consistent communication and reporting of key risks that could hinder the achievement of our business objectives and strategies. Our risk governance structure and risk management approach have not substantially changed from that described in our 2008 Annual Report. Certain risks have been outlined below. For a complete discussion of our risk governance structure and our risk management approach, see our 2008 Annual Report.

Certain sections of this MD&A represent a discussion relating to credit, market and liquidity risks and form an integral part of the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended April 30, 2009. These sections, which are included non-continuously below, are shaded on pages 21 to 23 of the fully formatted version of this second quarter 2009 Report to Shareholders, which can be found on the Bank’s website at www.td.com/investor/earnings.jsp.

CREDIT RISK

Gross credit risk exposures, measured before credit risk mitigants, are given below:

Credit Risk Exposures(1) – Standardized and AIRB Approaches
————————————————————————-
As at Apr. 30, 2009           As at Oct. 31, 2008
————————————————————
(millions of
Canadian     Standard-                     Standard-
dollars)       ized(2)     AIRB     Total    ized(2)     AIRB     Total
————————————————————————-
Retail
Residential
secured     $10,377  $134,310  $144,687    $7,733  $134,930  $142,663
Qualifying
revolving
retail            -    40,714    40,714         -    41,461    41,461
Other retail  17,193    22,157    39,350    15,386    20,415    35,801
————————————————————————-
Total retail    27,570   197,181   224,751    23,119   196,806   219,925
————————————————————————-
Non-retail
Corporate     50,947    99,827   150,774    44,991   113,119   158,110
Sovereign        397    56,762    57,159       305    57,856    58,161
Bank          15,206    80,908    96,114     8,302    91,635    99,937
————————————————————————-
Total
non-retail     66,550   237,497   304,047    53,598   262,610   316,208
————————————————————————-
Gross
credit risk
exposures     $94,120  $434,678  $528,798   $76,717  $459,416  $536,133
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1) Gross credit risk exposures represent Exposure at default and are
before the effects of credit risk mitigation. This table excludes
securitization and equity exposures.
(2) Beginning the first quarter of 2009, credit risk exposures from the
Commerce acquisition are reported using the Standardized approach,
previously reported within the Standardized approach using the
Interim Approach to Reporting.

MARKET RISK

A graph that discloses daily Value-at-Risk (VaR) usage and trading-related income(1) within the Wholesale Banking segment is included on page 21 of the fully formatted version of this second quarter 2009 Report to Shareholders, which can be found on the Bank’s website at www.td.com/investor/earnings.jsp. For the quarter ended April 30, 2009 trading-related income was positive for 85.9% of the trading days. Losses in the quarter did not exceed VaR on any trading day.

(1) Trading-related income is the total of net interest income on trading
positions reported in net interest income and trading income reported
in other income. Trading-related revenue in the graph above excludes
revenue related to changes in the fair value of loan commitments.
Similarly, the commitments are not included in the VaR measure as
they are not managed as trading positions. In the prior quarter,
there was a significant recovery realized on the cancellation of a
loan commitment due to specific circumstances related to the
borrower.

The following table presents the end of quarter, average, high and low Total VaR usage.

Value-at-Risk Usage
————————————————————————-
For the three months ended
—————————————————–
Apr. 30  Jan. 31  Apr. 30
2009     2009     2008
(millions of        —————————————————–
Canadian dollars)    As at  Average     High      Low  Average  Average
————————————————————————-
Interest rate and
credit spread risk   $21.3    $25.2    $36.4    $18.1    $31.4    $26.3
Equity risk            10.3      8.2     12.9      4.6     13.1     10.2
Foreign exchange risk   2.4      5.2      9.1      2.1      4.2      2.4
Commodity risk          0.6      0.9      2.1      0.5      1.0      1.6
Debt specific risk     29.3     39.4     50.1     29.3     49.2     31.2
Diversification
effect(1)            (30.0)   (32.1)   n/m(2)   n/m(2)   (38.9)   (29.8)
————————————————————————-
Total Value-at-Risk   $33.9    $46.8    $58.7    $33.9    $60.0    $41.9
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

————————————-
For the six
months ended
—————–
Apr. 30  Apr. 30
2009     2008
(millions of        —————–
Canadian dollars)  Average  Average
————————————-
Interest rate and
credit spread risk   $28.3    $21.1
Equity risk            10.6      7.7
Foreign exchange risk   4.7      2.5
Commodity risk          1.0      1.3
Debt specific risk     44.2     25.2
Diversification
effect(1)            (35.4)   (24.9)
————————————-
Total Value-at-Risk   $53.4    $32.9
————————————-
————————————-
(1) The aggregate VaR is less than the sum of the VaR of the different
risk types due to risk offsets resulting from portfolio
diversification.
(2) Not meaningful. It is not meaningful to compute a diversification
effect because the high and low may occur on different days for
different risk types.

Interest Rate Risk

A graph that shows our interest rate risk exposure (as measured by Economic Value at Risk, or EVaR) on all non-trading assets, liabilities and derivative instruments used for interest rate risk management instruments is included on page 22 of the fully formatted version of this second quarter 2009 Report to Shareholders, which can be found on the Bank’s website at www.td.com/investor/earnings.jsp.

The Bank uses derivative financial instruments, wholesale instruments and other capital market alternatives and, less frequently, product pricing strategies to manage interest rate risk. As at April 30, 2009, an immediate and sustained 100 bps increase in interest rates would have decreased the economic value of shareholders’ equity by $82.8 million after tax. An immediate and sustained 100 bps decrease in interest rates would have reduced the economic value of shareholders’ equity by $197.4 million after tax.

The following table shows the sensitivity of the economic value of shareholders’ equity (after tax) by currency for those currencies where the Bank has material exposure.

Sensitivity of After-tax Economic Value at Risk by Currency
————————————————————————-
As at               As at
Apr. 30, 2009       Oct. 31, 2008
—————————————–
100 bps   100 bps   100 bps   100 bps
(millions of Canadian dollars)    increase  decrease  increase  decrease
————————————————————————-
Canadian dollar                     $(10.2)   $(58.1)    $(0.4)   $(27.0)
U.S. dollar                          (72.6)   (139.3)   (122.4)     (2.0)
————————————————————————-

Liquidity Risk

As a financial organization, we must always ensure that we have access to enough readily-available funds to cover our financial obligations as they come due, and to sustain and grow our assets and operations under both normal and stress conditions. In the event of a funding disruption, we need to ensure we have sufficient liquid assets to continue to function. The process that ensures adequate access to funds is known as the management of liquidity risk.

Our overall liquidity requirement is defined as the amount of liquidity we need to fund expected cash outflows, as well as a prudent liquidity reserve to fund potential cash outflows in the event of a disruption in the capital markets or other event that could affect our access to liquidity. We do not rely on short-term wholesale funding for purposes other than funding marketable securities or short-term assets.

To define the amount of liquidity that must be held at all times for a specified minimum period, we use a conservative base-case scenario stress test. This scenario ensures that we have sufficient liquidity to cover 100% of our unsecured wholesale debt coming due, potential retail and commercial deposit run-off and forecasted operational requirements. In addition, we provide for coverage of Bank-sponsored funding programs, such as Bankers’ Acceptances we issue on behalf of clients, and Bank-sponsored asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP). We also use an extended liquidity coverage test to ensure that we can fund our operations on a fully secured basis for a period up to one year.

To meet liquidity requirements, we hold assets that can be readily converted into cash. Assets must be currently marketable, of sufficient credit quality and available for sale to be considered readily convertible into cash. Liquid assets are represented in a cumulative liquidity gap framework based on settlement timing and market depth. Assets that are not available without delay because they are needed for collateral or other similar purposes are not considered readily convertible into cash.

While each of our major operations has responsibility for the measurement and management of its own liquidity risks, we also manage liquidity on an enterprise-wide basis to ensure consistent and efficient management of liquidity risk across all of our operations. On April 30, 2009, our consolidated surplus liquid-asset position for up to 90 days, as measured under our base-case scenario, was $3.7 billion, compared with a surplus liquid-asset position of $16.4 billion on January 31, 2009. The $12.7 billion decrease in surplus liquid-asset position over the three month period ended April 30, 2009 was attributable primarily to changes in the liquidity value used for certain Wholesale Banking assets due to changes in market conditions. Our surplus liquid-asset position is our total liquid assets less our unsecured wholesale funding requirements, potential non-wholesale deposit run-off and contingent liabilities coming due in 90 days.

The base-case scenario models a Bank-specific liquidity stress event and assumes normal levels of asset liquidity in the markets. In response to conditions recently experienced in global financial markets which significantly affected liquidity, Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO) and the Risk Committee of the Board approved managing to a Systemic Market Event liquidity stress test scenario as directed by the Global Liquidity Risk Management policy. Building on the base-case scenario described above, the Systemic Market Event scenario further adjusts asset liquidity to reflect both the stressed conditions in the current market environment as well as the availability of high quality, unencumbered Bank-owned assets eligible as collateral under secured borrowing programs such as the Bank of Canada Term Purchase and Resale Agreement (PRA) and National Housing Act Mortgage-Backed Securities (NHA MBS) auction programs and other central bank programs. In addition, we assume coverage of increased contingent requirements for potential draws on committed line of credit facilities. Our policy requires that a surplus liquid-asset position be maintained for all measured time periods up to 90 days. As of April 30, 2009, we reported a positive surplus as required.

We have contingency plans in place to provide direction in the event of a liquidity crisis.

We also regularly review the level of increased collateral our trading counterparties would require in the event of a downgrade of the Bank’s credit rating. The impact of a one notch downgrade would be minimal and could be readily managed in the normal course of business.

In response to current conditions in global financial markets affecting liquidity, the Global Liquidity Forum meets frequently and closely monitors global funding market conditions and potential impacts to our funding access on a daily basis.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

The Bank carries out certain business activities via arrangements with special purpose entities (SPEs). We use SPEs to obtain sources of liquidity by securitizing certain of the Bank’s financial assets, to assist our clients in securitizing their financial assets and to create investment products for our clients. SPEs may be organized as trusts, partnerships or corporations and they may be formed as qualifying special purpose entities (QSPEs) or variable interest entities (VIEs). When an entity is deemed a VIE, the entity must be consolidated by the primary beneficiary. Consolidated SPEs have been presented in the Bank’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Securitization of Bank-Originated Assets

The Bank securitizes residential mortgages, personal loans and commercial mortgages to enhance its liquidity position, to diversify sources of funding and to optimize the management of the balance sheet. All products securitized by the Bank were originated in Canada and sold to Canadian securitization structures. Details of these securitization exposures are as follows:

Total Outstanding Exposures Securitized by the Bank as an
Originator(1),(2)
————————————————————————-
As at Apr. 30, 2009
——————————————
Significant           Significant
unconsolidated        unconsolidated
QSPEs                  SPEs
——————————————
Carrying              Carrying
Secur-   value of     Secur-   value of
itized   retained     itized   retained
(millions of Canadian dollars)   assets  interests     assets  interests
————————————————————————-
Residential mortgage loans           $-         $-    $34,078       $936
Personal loans                    8,100        102          -          -
Commercial mortgage loans           133          3          -          -
————————————————————————-
$8,233       $105    $34,078       $936
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

————————————————————————-
As at Oct. 31, 2008
——————————————
Significant           Significant
unconsolidated        unconsolidated
QSPEs                  SPEs
——————————————
Carrying              Carrying
Secur-   value of     Secur-   value of
itized   retained     itized   retained
(millions of Canadian dollars)   assets  interests     assets  interests
————————————————————————-
Residential mortgage loans           $-         $-    $24,332       $442
Personal loans                    8,100         80          -          -
Commercial mortgage loans           148          4          -          -
————————————————————————-
$8,248        $84    $24,332       $442
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1) Certain comparative amounts have been restated and reclassified to
conform to the presentation adopted in the current period.
(2) In all the securitization transactions that the Bank has undertaken
for its own assets, it has acted as an originating bank and retained
securitization exposure.

Residential Mortgage Loans

The Bank may be exposed to the risks of transferred loans to the securitization vehicles through retained interests. There are no expected credit losses on the retained interests of the securitized residential mortgages as the mortgages are all government guaranteed.

Personal Loans

The Bank securitizes personal loans through QSPEs, as well as single-seller conduits via QSPEs. As at April 30, 2009, the single-seller conduits had $5.1 billion (October 31, 2008 – $5.1 billion) of commercial paper outstanding while another Bank-sponsored QSPE had $3.0 billion (October 31, 2008 – $3.0 billion) of term notes outstanding. While the probability of loss is negligible, as at April 30, 2009, the Bank’s maximum potential exposure to loss for these conduits through the sole provision of liquidity facilities was $5.1 billion (October 31, 2008 – $5.1 billion) of which $1.1 billion (October 31, 2008 – $1.1 billion) of underlying personal loans was government insured. Additionally, the Bank had retained interests of $102 million (October 31, 2008 – $80 million) relating to excess spread.

Commercial Mortgage Loans

As at April 30, 2009, the Bank’s maximum potential exposure to loss was $3 million (October 31, 2008 – $4 million) through retained interests in the excess spread and cash collateral account of the QSPE.

Securitization of Third Party-Originated Assets

The Bank administers multi-seller conduits and provides liquidity facilities as well as securities distribution services; it may also provide credit enhancements. Third party-originated assets are securitized through Bank-sponsored SPEs, which are not consolidated by the Bank. The Bank’s maximum potential exposure to loss due to its ownership interest in commercial paper and through the provision of global style liquidity facilities for multi-seller conduits was $9.0 billion (October 31, 2008 – $10.7 billion) as at April 30, 2009. Further, the Bank has committed an additional $2.0 billion (October 31, 2008 – $1.8 billion) in liquidity facilities for ABCP that could potentially be issued by the conduits. As at April 30, 2009, the Bank also provided deal-specific credit enhancement in the amount of $75 million (October 31, 2008 – $78 million).

All third-party assets securitized by the Bank were originated in Canada and sold to Canadian securitization structures. Details of the Bank-administered multi-seller, ABCP conduits are as follows:

Total Exposure to Third Party-Originated Assets Securitized by
Bank-Sponsored Conduits
————————————————————————-
As at Apr. 30, 2009
——————————————-
Ratings profile of  Expected
Significant     SPE asset class  weighted
unconsol- ——————-  average
idated              AA+ to      life
(millions of Canadian dollars)        SPEs       AAA       AA- (years)(1)
————————————————————————-
Residential mortgage loans          $2,890    $2,844       $46       2.3
Credit card loans                      500       500         -       3.2
Automobile loans and leases          3,547     3,543         4       1.4
Equipment loans and leases             526       526         -       1.2
Trade receivables                    1,570     1,546        24       2.6
————————————————————————-
$9,033    $8,959       $74       2.0
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

—————————————————————
As at Oct. 31, 2008
———————————
Ratings profile of
Significant     SPE asset class
unconsol- ——————-
idated              AA+ to
(millions of Canadian dollars)        SPEs       AAA       AA-
—————————————————————
Residential mortgage loans          $3,428    $3,378       $50
Credit card loans                      500       500         -
Automobile loans and leases          4,474     4,470         4
Equipment loans and leases             638       636         2
Trade receivables                    1,705     1,679        26
—————————————————————
$10,745   $10,663       $82
—————————————————————
—————————————————————
(1) Expected weighted average life for each asset type is based upon each
conduit’s remaining purchase commitment for revolving pools and the
expected weighted average life of the assets for amortizing pools.

As at April 30, 2009, the Bank held $1.5 billion (October 31, 2008 – $2.8 billion) of ABCP issued by Bank-sponsored multi-seller and single-seller conduits, on its balance sheet.

Exposure to Third Party-Sponsored Conduits

The Bank has exposure to the U.S. arising from providing liquidity facilities of $339 million (October 31, 2008 – $465 million) to third party-sponsored conduits of which $207 million (October 31, 2008 – $24 million) has been drawn. The assets within these conduits primarily comprise automotive-related financing assets, including loans and leases. During the three months ended April 30, 2009 and subsequently, these assets have received significantly different ratings (split ratings) from various credit rating agencies, ranging from AAA to BB-. The weighted average of the lowest of the split ratings, in the event that the facilities are drawn, will result in credit exposure to the Bank of BBB+ (October 31, 2008 – AAA).

The Bank’s exposure to Canadian third party-sponsored conduits in the form of margin funding facilities as at April 30, 2009 was not significant.

Other Investment and Financing Products

Other Financing Transactions

The Bank enters into transactions with major U.S. corporate clients through VIEs as a means to provide them with cost efficient financing. Under these transactions, as at April 30, 2009, the Bank provided approximately $2.12 billion (October 31, 2008 – $2.13 billion) in financing to these VIEs. The Bank has received guarantees from or has recourse to major U.S. banks with A+ credit ratings on an S&P-equivalent basis, fully covering its investments in these VIEs (October 31, 2008 – AA). At inception or through recent restructuring of the transactions, the counterparties posted collateral with AAA ratings on an S&P-equivalent basis in favour of the Bank and the Bank purchased credit protection to further reduce its exposure to the U.S. banks. At April 30, 2009, the Bank’s net exposure to the U.S. banks after taking into account collateral and CDS was approximately $361 million (October 31, 2008 – $960 million). As at April 30, 2009, the Bank’s maximum total exposure to loss before considering guarantees, recourse, collateral and CDS was approximately $2.12 billion (October 31, 2008 – $2.13 billion). The transactions allow the Bank or the counterparties discretion to exit the transactions on short notice. As at April 30, 2009, these VIEs had assets totalling more than $9.1 billion (October 31, 2008 – $8.0 billion).

Exposure to Collateralized Debt Obligations

Since the decision was made in 2005 to exit the structured products business, the Bank no longer originates Collateralized Debt Obligation vehicles (CDOs). Total CDOs purchased and sold in the trading portfolio as at April 30, 2009, were as follows:

————————————————————————-
As at               As at
Apr. 30, 2009(1)    Oct. 31, 2008(1)
—————————————-
Positive            Positive
(negative)          (negative)
Notional      fair  Notional      fair
(millions of Canadian dollars)      amount     value    amount     value
————————————————————————-
Funded
CDOs – Purchased protection via
Bank-issued credit linked notes    $242      $(49)     $283      $(38)
Unfunded
CDOs – Sold protection
- positive fair value              898         -       891         -
- negative fair value                -      (276)        -      (278)
CDOs – Purchased protection
- positive fair value              170       103       261       104
- negative fair value                -        (4)        -       (28)
Unfunded – Similar Reference
Portfolio
CDOs – Sold protection
- positive fair value               79         4     1,820         5
- negative fair value                -         -         -      (568)
CDOs – Purchased protection
- positive fair value               79         -     1,883       613
- negative fair value                -        (4)        -        (5)
————————————————————————-
(1) This table excludes standard index tranche CDOs.

The Bank does not have any exposure to U.S. subprime mortgages via the CDOs. The CDOs are referenced to corporate debt securities. The hedges on the similar reference portfolio are not entered into with monoline insurers; rather they are entered into with global financial institutions, such as universal banks or broker-dealers. All exposures are managed with risk limits that have been approved by the Bank’s risk management group and are hedged with various financial instruments, including credit derivatives and bonds within the trading portfolio, not included in this table. Counterparty exposure on hedges is collateralized under Credit Support Agreements (CSAs) and netting arrangements, consistent with other over-the-counter (OTC) derivative contracts. The Bank’s CDO positions are fair valued using valuation techniques with significant non-observable market inputs. The potential effect of using reasonable possible alternative assumptions for valuing these CDO positions would range from a reduction in the fair value by $7.4 million to an increase in the fair value by $6.8 million.

Leveraged Finance Credit Commitments

Included in ‘Commitments to extend credit’ in Note 28 to the 2008 Consolidated Financial Statements are leveraged finance commitments. Leveraged finance commitments are agreements that provide funding to a wholesale borrower with higher levels of debt, measured by the ratio of debt capital to equity capital of the borrower, relative to the industry in which it operates. The Bank’s exposure to leveraged finance commitments as at April 30, 2009, was not significant (October 31, 2008 – $3.3 billion).

QUARTERLY RESULTS

The following table provides summary information related to the Bank’s
eight most recently completed quarters.

Quarterly Results(1)
————————————————————————-
For the three months ended
—————————————-
2009                2008
—————————————-
(millions of Canadian dollars)     Apr. 30   Jan. 31   Oct. 31   July 31
————————————————————————-
Net interest income                 $2,940    $2,728    $2,449    $2,437
Other income                         1,385     1,422     1,191     1,600
————————————————————————-
Total revenue                        4,325     4,150     3,640     4,037
Provision for credit losses           (656)     (537)     (288)     (288)
Non-interest expenses               (3,051)   (3,020)   (2,367)   (2,701)
(Provision for) recovery of
income taxes                          (35)       58       (20)     (122)
Non-controlling interests in
subsidiaries, net of income taxes     (28)      (28)      (18)       (8)
Equity in net income of an
associated company, net of
income taxes                           63        89        67        79
————————————————————————-
Net income – reported                  618       712     1,014       997
————————————————————————-
Items of note affecting net
income, net of income taxes:
Amortization of intangibles          127       127       126       111
Reversal of Enron litigation
reserve                               -         -      (323)        -
Decrease (increase) in fair value
of derivatives hedging the
reclassified available-for-sale
debt securities portfolio           134       200      (118)        -
Gain relating to restructuring
of Visa                               -         -         -         -
Restructuring and integration
charges relating to the
Commerce acquisition                 50        67        25        15
Decrease (increase) in fair value
of credit default swaps hedging
the corporate loan book, net of
provision for credit losses          44       (12)      (59)      (22)
Other tax items                        -         -         -        14
Provision for insurance claims         -         -         -         -
General allowance increase
(release) in Canadian Personal
and Commercial Banking
(excluding VFC) and
Wholesale Banking                    77        55         -         -
Settlement of TD Banknorth
shareholder litigation               39         -         -         -
————————————————————————-
Total adjustments for items of
note, net of income taxes             471       437      (349)      118
————————————————————————-
Net income – adjusted                1,089     1,149       665     1,115
Preferred dividends                    (41)      (29)      (23)      (17)
————————————————————————-
Net income available to common
shareholders – adjusted            $1,048    $1,120      $642    $1,098
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

(Canadian dollars, except as noted)
————————————————————————-
Basic earnings per share
- reported                         $0.68     $0.82     $1.23     $1.22
- adjusted                          1.23      1.35      0.79      1.37
Diluted earnings per share
- reported                          0.68      0.82      1.22      1.21
- adjusted                          1.23      1.34      0.79      1.35
Return on common shareholders’
equity                               6.6%      8.1%     13.3%     13.4%
————————————————————————-

————————————————————————-
For the three months ended
—————————————-
2008                2007
—————————————-
(millions of Canadian dollars)     Apr. 30   Jan. 31   Oct. 31   July 31
————————————————————————-
Net interest income                 $1,858    $1,788    $1,808    $1,783
Other income                         1,530     1,816     1,742     1,899
————————————————————————-
Total revenue                        3,388     3,604     3,550     3,682
Provision for credit losses           (232)     (255)     (139)     (171)
Non-interest expenses               (2,206)   (2,228)   (2,241)   (2,216)
(Provision for) recovery of
income taxes                         (160)     (235)     (153)     (248)
Non-controlling interests in
subsidiaries, net of income taxes      (9)       (8)       (8)      (13)
Equity in net income of an
associated company, net of
income taxes                           71        92        85        69
————————————————————————-
Net income – reported                  852       970     1,094     1,103
————————————————————————-
Items of note affecting net
income, net of income taxes:
Amortization of intangibles           92        75        99        91
Reversal of Enron litigation
reserve                               -         -         -         -
Decrease (increase) in fair value
of derivatives hedging the
reclassified available-for-sale
debt securities portfolio             -         -         -         -
Gain relating to restructuring
of Visa                               -         -      (135)        -
Restructuring and integration
charges relating to the
Commerce acquisition                 30         -         -         -
Decrease (increase) in fair value
of credit default swaps hedging
the corporate loan book, net of
provision for credit losses          (1)      (25)        2       (30)
Other tax items                        -        20         -         -
Provision for insurance claims         -        20         -         -
General allowance increase
(release) in Canadian Personal
and Commercial Banking
(excluding VFC) and
Wholesale Banking                     -         -       (39)        -
Settlement of TD Banknorth
shareholder litigation                -         -         -         -
————————————————————————-
Total adjustments for items of
note, net of income taxes             121        90       (73)       61
————————————————————————-
Net income – adjusted                  973     1,060     1,021     1,164
Preferred dividends                    (11)       (8)       (5)       (2)
————————————————————————-
Net income available to common
shareholders – adjusted              $962    $1,052    $1,016    $1,162
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

(Canadian dollars, except as noted)
————————————————————————-
Basic earnings per share
- reported                         $1.12     $1.34     $1.52     $1.53
- adjusted                          1.33      1.46      1.42      1.61
Diluted earnings per share
- reported                          1.12      1.33      1.50      1.51
- adjusted                          1.32      1.45      1.40      1.60
Return on common shareholders’
equity                              13.4%     18.0%     20.8%     21.0%
————————————————————————-
(1) Certain comparative amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
presentation adopted in the current period.

ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The Bank’s unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements, presented on pages 29 to 44 of this Report to Shareholders, have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. These Interim Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Bank’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended October 31, 2008. The accounting policies used in the preparation of these Consolidated Financial Statements are consistent with those used in the Bank’s 2008 Consolidated Financial Statements, except as described below.

Changes in Accounting Policies

Alignment of Reporting Period of U.S. Entities

Effective for the quarter ended April 30, 2009, the reporting periods of TD Banknorth and Commerce have been aligned with the reporting period of the Bank to eliminate the one month lag in financial reporting. Previously, the reporting periods of TD Banknorth and Commerce were included in the Bank’s financial statements on a one month lag. In accordance with CICA Handbook Section 1506, Accounting Changes, this alignment is considered a change in accounting policy. Changes in accounting policy are to be reported through retrospective application to all prior period financial statements presented. The Bank has assessed that the impact to the prior period consolidated financial statements is not material and therefore, an adjustment was made to opening retained earnings to align the reporting periods of TD Banknorth and Commerce to that of the Bank’s reporting period. Accordingly, the results of TD Banknorth and Commerce for the three months ended April 30, 2009 have been included with the results of the Bank for the three and six months ended April 30, 2009, while the results of January 2009 have been included directly in retained earnings and not included in the Interim Consolidated Statement of Income.

Subsequent Accounting for Impaired Financial Assets

During the quarter, the Bank adopted an amendment to CICA Handbook Section 3855, Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement. The amendment clarified that, subsequent to the recognition of an impairment loss on a financial asset (other than a loan), interest income on the impaired financial asset is recognized using the interest rate used to determine the impairment loss. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material impact on the financial position or the earnings of the Bank.

Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Financial Statement Concepts

Effective November 1, 2008, the Bank adopted CICA Handbook Section 3064, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, which clarifies that costs can be deferred only when they relate to an item that meets the definition of an asset, and as a result, start-up costs must be expensed as incurred. CICA Handbook Section 1000, Financial Statement Concepts, was also amended to provide consistency with Section 3064. These standards did not have a material effect on the financial position or earnings of the Bank.

Credit Risk and Fair Value

Effective November 1, 2008, the Bank adopted EIC 173, Credit Risk and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The abstract clarifies how the Bank’s own credit risk and the credit risk of the counterparty should be taken into account in determining the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including derivatives. The new guidance did not have a material effect on the financial position or earnings of the Bank.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The critical accounting estimates remain unchanged from those disclosed in the Bank’s 2008 Annual Report.

Future Accounting and Reporting Changes

Financial Instruments Disclosures

The CICA’s Accounting Standards Board (AcSB) amended CICA Handbook Section 3862, Financial Instruments – Disclosures, to enhance the disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements and the liquidity risk of financial instruments. The amendments will be effective for the Bank’s fiscal year ending October 31, 2009.

Conversion to International Financial Reporting Standards in Fiscal 2012

The AcSB requires that all Canadian publicly accountable enterprises adopt IFRS for years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. IFRS uses a conceptual framework similar to Canadian GAAP, but there are some differences in recognition, measurement and disclosures.

IFRS will be effective for the Bank for the fiscal 2012 year beginning on November 1, 2011. This includes restatement of prior year comparative fiscal 2011 financial results for interim and annual periods. Currently, the Bank is in the planning phase of converting to IFRS. It is not yet possible to fully determine the impact to the financial statements, as accounting standards and their interpretations are changing. The conversion to IFRS is a significant initiative for the Bank, for which substantial resources are being dedicated to ensure proper implementation.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

During the most recent interim period, there have been no changes in the Bank’s policies and procedures and other processes that comprise its internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting.

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
————————————————————————-

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (unaudited)
————————————————————————-
As at
——————–
Apr. 30   Oct. 31
(millions of Canadian dollars)                            2009      2008
————————————————————————-
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks                                 $2,437    $2,517
Interest-bearing deposits with banks                    10,805    15,429
————————————————————————-
13,242    17,946
————————————————————————-
Securities
Trading                                                 51,232    53,095
Designated as trading under the fair value option        8,732     6,402
Available-for-sale (Note 2)                             96,481    75,121
Held-to-maturity                                        12,480     9,507
————————————————————————-
168,925   144,125
————————————————————————-
Securities purchased under reverse repurchase
agreements                                             31,609    42,425
————————————————————————-
Loans
Residential mortgages                                   60,135    63,003
Consumer installment and other personal                 86,857    79,610
Credit card                                              7,667     7,387
Business and government                                 76,721    70,650
Business and government loans designated as
trading under the fair value option                       381       510
————————————————————————-
231,761   221,160
Allowance for loan losses (Note 3)                      (1,916)   (1,536)
————————————————————————-
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses                229,845   219,624
————————————————————————-
Other
Customers’ liability under acceptances                  10,954    11,040
Investment in TD Ameritrade                              6,271     5,159
Derivatives                                             74,376    83,548
Goodwill                                                16,384    14,842
Other intangibles                                        3,062     3,141
Land, buildings and equipment                            4,166     3,833
Other assets                                            16,048    17,531
————————————————————————-
131,261   139,094
————————————————————————-
Total assets                                          $574,882  $563,214
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
LIABILITIES
————————————————————————-
Deposits
Personal                                              $215,508  $192,234
Banks                                                    5,023     9,680
Business and government                                131,727   129,086
Trading                                                 49,697    44,694
————————————————————————-
401,955   375,694
————————————————————————-
Other
Acceptances                                             10,954    11,040
Obligations related to securities sold short            13,802    18,518
Obligations related to securities sold under
repurchase agreements                                   4,945    18,654
Derivatives                                             68,917    74,473
Other liabilities                                       19,142    17,721
————————————————————————-
117,760   140,406
————————————————————————-
Subordinated notes and debentures                       12,469    12,436
————————————————————————-
Liability for preferred shares (Note 5)                    550       550
————————————————————————-
Liability for capital trust securities (Note 6)            900       894
————————————————————————-
Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries (Note 7)       1,621     1,560
————————————————————————-
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common shares (millions of shares issued and
outstanding: Apr. 30, 2009 – 850.6 and
Oct. 31, 2008 – 810.1) (Note 8)                        14,875    13,241
Preferred shares (millions of shares issued and
outstanding: Apr. 30, 2009 – 135.8 and
Oct. 31, 2008 – 75.0) (Note 8)                          3,395     1,875
Contributed surplus                                        350       350
Retained earnings                                       18,039    17,857
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(Note 10)                                               2,968    (1,649)
————————————————————————-
39,627    31,674
————————————————————————-
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity            $574,882  $563,214
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Interim Consolidated
Financial Statements.

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (unaudited)
————————————————————————-
For the three         For the six
months ended        months ended
—————————————-
Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
(millions of Canadian dollars)        2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Interest income
Loans                               $2,749    $3,240    $5,990    $6,636
Securities
Dividends                            242       242       504       502
Interest                           1,339       929     2,753     1,904
Deposits with banks                    570       159       856       273
————————————————————————-
4,900     4,570    10,103     9,315
————————————————————————-
Interest expense
Deposits                             1,503     2,056     3,471     4,310
Subordinated notes and debentures      169       159       335       317
Preferred shares and capital
trust securities                       23        23        47        46
Other                                  265       474       582       996
————————————————————————-
1,960     2,712     4,435     5,669
————————————————————————-
Net interest income                  2,940     1,858     5,668     3,646
————————————————————————-
Other income
Investment and securities services     538       544     1,049     1,123
Credit fees                            138       108       304       209
Net securities (losses) gains
(Note 2)                             (168)      110      (373)      262
Trading income (loss)                   28      (104)      132        56
Income (loss) from financial
instruments designated as trading
under the fair value option           267         5       335       (44)
Service charges                        373       258       754       518
Loan securitizations (Note 4)          184        91       241       167
Card services                          152       116       344       235
Insurance, net of claims               228       250       458       436
Trust fees                              39        36        73        70
Other                                 (394)      116      (510)      314
————————————————————————-
1,385     1,530     2,807     3,346
————————————————————————-
Total revenue                        4,325     3,388     8,475     6,992
————————————————————————-
Provision for credit losses
(Note 3)                              656       232     1,193       487
————————————————————————-
Non-interest expenses
Salaries and employee benefits       1,474     1,137     2,951     2,308
Occupancy, including depreciation      313       188       621       369
Equipment, including depreciation      219       148       424       292
Amortization of other intangibles      171       117       344       239
Restructuring costs (Note 16)            -        48        27        48
Marketing and business development     143       102       281       212
Brokerage-related fees                  68        63       131       122
Professional and advisory services     175       118       340       229
Communications                          62        48       121        95
Other (Note 17)                        426       237       831       520
————————————————————————-
3,051     2,206     6,071     4,434
————————————————————————-
Income before income taxes,
non-controlling interests in
subsidiaries and equity in net
income of an associated company       618       950     1,211     2,071
Provision for (recovery of) income
taxes                                  35       160       (23)      395
Non-controlling interests in
subsidiaries, net of income taxes      28         9        56        17
Equity in net income of an
associated company, net of
income taxes                           63        71       152       163
————————————————————————-
Net income                             618       852     1,330     1,822
Preferred dividends                     41        11        70        19
————————————————————————-
Net income available to common
shareholders                         $577      $841    $1,260    $1,803
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
Average number of common shares
outstanding (millions) (Note 13)
Basic                              848.8     747.7     840.6     732.9
Diluted                            849.8     753.7     841.9     739.0
Earnings per share (in dollars)
(Note 13)
Basic                              $0.68     $1.12     $1.50     $2.46
Diluted                             0.68      1.12      1.50      2.44
Dividends per share (in dollars)      0.61      0.59      1.22      1.16
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Interim Consolidated
Financial Statements.

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(unaudited)
————————————————————————-
For the three         For the six
months ended        months ended
—————————————-
Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
(millions of Canadian dollars)        2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Common shares (Note 8)
Balance at beginning of period     $14,781    $6,632   $13,241    $6,577
Proceeds from shares issued on
exercise of stock options               6        29        45        71
Shares issued as a result of
dividend reinvestment plan             80        22       208        43
Proceeds from issuance of new
shares                                  -         -     1,381         -
Shares issued on acquisition of
Commerce                                -     6,147         -     6,147
Impact of shares sold (acquired)
for trading purposes(1)                 8       (12)        -       (20)
————————————————————————-
Balance at end of period            14,875    12,818    14,875    12,818
————————————————————————-
Preferred shares (Note 8)
Balance at beginning of period       2,770       875     1,875       425
Shares issued                          625       250     1,520       700
————————————————————————-
Balance at end of period             3,395     1,125     3,395     1,125
————————————————————————-
Contributed surplus
Balance at beginning of period         340       121       350       119
Stock options (Note 11)                 10        (1)        -         1
Conversion of Commerce stock
options on acquisition (Note 11)        -       263         -       263
————————————————————————-
Balance at end of period               350       383       350       383
————————————————————————-
Retained earnings
Balance at beginning of period      17,986    16,499    17,857    15,954
Net income of U.S. entities for
January 2009 (Note 1)                   4         -         4         -
Net income                             618       852     1,330     1,822
Common dividends                      (518)     (473)   (1,034)     (883)
Preferred dividends                    (41)      (11)      (70)      (19)
Share issue expenses                   (10)       (3)      (48)      (10)
————————————————————————-
Balance at end of period            18,039    16,864    18,039    16,864
————————————————————————-
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) (Note 10)
Balance at beginning of period       2,173    (1,187)   (1,649)   (1,671)
Other comprehensive income of U.S.
entities for January 2009 (Note 1)    329         -       329         -
Other comprehensive income for
the period                            466       592     4,288     1,076
————————————————————————-
Balance at end of period             2,968      (595)    2,968      (595)
————————————————————————-
Retained earnings and accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)  21,007    16,269    21,007    16,269
————————————————————————-
Total shareholders’ equity         $39,627   $30,595   $39,627   $30,595
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1) Sold or purchased by subsidiaries of the Bank, which are regulated
securities entities in accordance with Regulation 92-313 under the
Bank Act.

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (unaudited)
————————————————————————-
For the three         For the six
months ended        months ended
—————————————-
Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
(millions of Canadian dollars)        2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Net income                            $618      $852    $1,330    $1,822
————————————————————————-
Other comprehensive income (loss),
net of income taxes
Change in unrealized gains
(losses) on available-for-sale
securities, net of hedging
activities(a)                       890       (61)     (333)      192
Reclassification to earnings of
losses (gains) in respect of
available-for-sale securities(b)    136       (13)      167       (41)
Net change in unrealized foreign
currency translation (losses)
gains on investments in
subsidiaries, net of hedging
activities(c),(d)                  (632)      470     2,929       239
Change in gains on derivative
instruments designated as cash
flow hedges(e)                      461       227     2,064       723
Reclassification to earnings of
gains on cash flow hedges(f)       (389)      (31)     (539)      (37)
————————————————————————-
Other comprehensive income for
the period                          466       592     4,288     1,076
————————————————————————-
Comprehensive income for the
period                             $1,084    $1,444    $5,618    $2,898
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(a) Net of income tax provision of $451 million and income tax recovery
of $237 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended
April 30, 2009 (three and six months ended April 30, 2008 – income
tax recovery of $83 million and income tax provision of $70 million,
respectively).
(b) Net of income tax recovery of $56 million and $72 million,
respectively, for the three and six months ended April 30, 2009
(three and six months ended April 30, 2008 – income tax provision of
$6 million and $16 million, respectively).
(c) Net of income tax provision of $205 million and $125 million,
respectively, for the three and six months ended April 30, 2009
(three and six months ended April 30, 2008 – income tax recovery of
$14 million and $295 million, respectively).
(d) Includes $302 million and $109 million, respectively, of after-tax
gains arising from hedges of the Bank’s investment in foreign
operations for the three and six months ended April 30, 2009 (three
and six months ended April 30, 2008 – after-tax losses of $42 million
and $674 million, respectively).
(e) Net of income tax provision of $202 million and $943 million,
respectively, for the three and six months ended April 30, 2009
(three and six months ended April 30, 2008 – income tax provision of
$95 million and $318 million, respectively).
(f) Net of income tax provision of $169 million and $233 million,
respectively, for the three and six months ended April 30, 2009
(three and six months ended April 30, 2008 – income tax provision of
$13 million and $16 million, respectively).

Certain comparative amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
current period’s presentation.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Interim Consolidated
Financial Statements.

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
————————————————————————-
For the three         For the six
months ended        months ended
—————————————-
Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
(millions of Canadian dollars)        2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Cash flows from (used in)
operating activities
Net income                            $618      $852    $1,330    $1,822
Adjustments to determine net
cash flows from (used in)
operating activities:
Provision for credit losses          656       232     1,193       487
Restructuring costs (Note 16)          -        48        27        48
Depreciation                         139        85       278       167
Amortization of other intangibles    171       117       344       239
Stock options                         11         6        17        11
Net securities losses (gains)        168      (110)      373      (262)
Net gain on securitizations
(Note 4)                           (157)      (38)     (181)      (61)
Equity in net income of an
associated company                  (63)      (71)     (152)     (163)
Non-controlling interests             28         9        56        17
Future income taxes                   40       (91)       72        21
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
Current income taxes payable       1,495      (514)    1,186    (1,512)
Interest receivable and payable      (12)     (162)      215      (114)
Trading securities                 1,640    (3,342)     (601)      672
Derivative assets                 12,833    (1,975)    8,949    (1,403)
Derivative liabilities           (10,243)    1,959    (5,372)   (1,083)
Other                              1,458     2,333     3,757    (1,941)
————————————————————————-
Net cash from (used in)
operating activities                8,782      (662)   11,491    (3,055)
————————————————————————-
Cash flows from (used in)
financing activities
Change in deposits                  (1,296)   16,569    25,240    25,859
Change in securities sold under
repurchase agreements              (1,455)   (2,667)  (13,987)   (1,724)
Change in securities sold short       (758)   (2,251)   (4,716)     (649)
Issue of subordinated notes and
debentures                              -       500         -     3,000
Repayment of subordinated notes
and debentures                          -         -       (18)        -
Liability for preferred shares
and capital trust securities            5       (21)        6       (21)
Translation adjustment on
subordinated notes and
debentures issued in a foreign
currency and other                    (30)       27        47        17
Commons shares issued for cash,
net of expenses                         -         -     1,356         -
Common shares issued on exercise
of stock options                        5        22        28        61
Common shares sold (acquired) in
Wholesale Banking                       8       (12)        -       (20)
Dividends paid in cash on common
shares                               (438)     (451)     (826)     (840)
Net proceeds from issuance of
preferred shares                      615       247     1,497       690
Dividends paid on preferred shares     (41)      (11)      (70)      (19)
————————————————————————-
Net cash (used in) from financing
activities                         (3,385)   11,952     8,557    26,354
————————————————————————-
Cash flows from (used in)
investing activities
Interest-bearing deposits with
banks                               3,390    (2,500)    1,985      (853)
Activity in available-for-sale
and held-to-maturity securities:
Purchases                        (32,567)  (28,754)  (59,750)  (38,430)
Proceeds from maturities          12,819     3,348    21,288     6,697
Proceeds from sales                8,420    26,328    16,236    31,689
Activity in lending activities:
Origination and acquisitions     (35,187)  (31,920)  (84,466)  (69,614)
Proceeds from maturities          25,031    21,548    58,678    51,348
Proceeds from sales                  116       292       219       453
Proceeds from loan
securitizations (Note 4)          6,585     1,524    14,858     3,414
Land, buildings and equipment          (78)      (85)     (586)     (162)
Securities purchased under
reverse repurchase agreements       5,896     1,167    11,614    (5,419)
Acquisitions and dispositions
less cash and cash equivalents
acquired (Note 18)                      -    (1,759)        -    (1,759)
————————————————————————-
Net cash used in investing
activities                         (5,575)  (10,811)  (19,924)  (22,636)
————————————————————————-
Effect of exchange rate changes
on cash and cash equivalents          (46)        5       (15)       67
————————————————————————-
Net (decrease) increase in cash
and cash equivalents                 (224)      484       109       730
Impact due to reporting-period
alignment of U.S. entities
(Note 1)                             (189)        -      (189)        -
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period                 2,850     2,036     2,517     1,790
————————————————————————-
Cash and cash equivalents at end
of period, represented by cash
and due from banks                 $2,437    $2,520    $2,437    $2,520
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
Supplementary disclosure of cash
flow information
Amount of interest paid during
the period                         $1,943    $2,607    $5,143    $5,600
Amount of income taxes paid
during the period                    (880)      496      (878)    1,532
————————————————————————-

Certain comparative amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
current period’s presentation.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Interim Consolidated
Financial Statements.

NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
————————————————————————-

Note 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
————————————————————————-

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

These Interim Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in
accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
and follow the same accounting policies and methods of application as the
Bank’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended
October 31, 2008, except as described in Note 1. Under GAAP, additional
disclosures are required in the annual financial statements and
accordingly, these Interim Consolidated Financial Statements should be
read in conjunction with the 2008 Consolidated Financial Statements and
the accompanying notes included on pages 92 to 135 and the shaded
sections of the 2008 Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) included
on pages 68 to 76 of the Bank’s 2008 Annual Report. Certain disclosures
are included in the MD&A as permitted by GAAP and as discussed on pages
21 to 23 of the MD&A in this report. These disclosures are shaded in the
MD&A and form an integral part of the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements. The Interim Consolidated Financial Statements include all
adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair
presentation of the results for the periods presented.

CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Alignment of Reporting Period of U.S. Entities

Effective for the quarter ended April 30, 2009, the reporting periods of
TD Banknorth Inc. (TD Banknorth) and Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (Commerce)
have been aligned with the reporting period of the Bank to eliminate the
one month lag in financial reporting. Previously, the reporting periods
of TD Banknorth and Commerce were included in the Bank’s financial
statements on a one month lag. In accordance with Canadian Institute of
Chartered Accountant’s (CICA) Handbook Section 1506, Accounting Changes,
this alignment is considered a change in accounting policy. Changes in
accounting policy are to be reported through retrospective application to
all prior period financial statements presented. The Bank has assessed
that the impact to the prior period consolidated financial statements is
not material and therefore, an adjustment was made to opening retained
earnings to align the reporting periods of TD Banknorth and Commerce to
that of the Bank’s reporting period. Accordingly, the results of
TD Banknorth and Commerce for the three months ended April 30, 2009 have
been included with the results of the Bank for the three and six months
ended April 30, 2009, while the results of January 2009 have been
included directly in retained earnings and not included in the Interim
Consolidated Statement of Income.

Subsequent Accounting for Impaired Financial Assets

On April 29, 2009, the Bank adopted an amendment to CICA Handbook Section
3855, Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement. The amendment
clarified that, subsequent to the recognition of an impairment loss on a
financial asset (other than a loan), interest income on the impaired
financial asset is recognized using the rate of interest used to
determine the impairment loss. The adoption of this amendment did not
have a material impact on the financial position or the earnings of the
Bank.

Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Financial Statement Concepts

Effective November 1, 2008, the Bank adopted CICA Handbook Section 3064,
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, which clarifies that costs can be
deferred only when they relate to an item that meets the definition of an
asset, and as a result, start-up costs must be expensed as incurred. CICA
Handbook Section 1000, Financial Statement Concepts, was also amended to
provide consistency with the new standard. The adoption of these
standards did not have a material impact on the financial position or
earnings of the Bank.

Credit Risk and Fair Value

Effective November 1, 2008, the Bank adopted EIC 173, Credit Risk and the
Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The abstract
clarifies how the Bank’s own credit risk and the credit risk of the
counterparty should be taken into account in determining the fair value
of financial assets and financial liabilities, including derivatives. The
new guidance did not have a material effect on the financial position or
earnings of the Bank.

FUTURE CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Financial Instruments Disclosures

The CICA’s Accounting Standards Board (AcSB) amended the CICA Handbook
Section 3862, Financial Instruments – Disclosures, to enhance the
disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements and the
liquidity risk of financial instruments. The amendments will be effective
for the Bank’s fiscal year ending October 31, 2009.

Conversion to International Financial Reporting Standards

The AcSB requires that all Canadian publicly accountable enterprises
adopt International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for years
beginning on or after January 1, 2011. IFRS uses a conceptual framework
similar to Canadian GAAP, but there are some differences in recognition,
measurement and disclosures.

IFRS will be effective for the Bank for the fiscal 2012 year beginning on
November 1, 2011. This includes restatement of prior year comparative
fiscal 2011 financial results for interim and annual periods. Currently,
the Bank is in the planning phase of converting to IFRS. It is not yet
possible to fully determine the impact to the financial statements, as
accounting standards and their interpretations are changing. The
conversion to IFRS is a significant initiative for the Bank, for which
substantial resources are being dedicated to ensure proper
implementation.

Note 2: SECURITIES
————————————————————————-

Impairment of Available-for-Sale Securities

Available-for-sale securities are written down to fair value through net
income whenever it is necessary to reflect other-than-temporary
impairment. For the three and six months ended April 30, 2009, the Bank
recognized impairment losses on available-for-sale securities that were
deemed to be other-than-temporary of $98 million and $311 million,
respectively. These losses were primarily related to the Wholesale
Banking segment.

Reclassification of Certain Debt Securities

As described in more detail in Notes 1 and 2 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for the year ended October 31, 2008, as a result of
deterioration in markets and severe dislocation in the credit market, the
Bank changed its trading strategy with respect to certain trading debt
securities and reclassified these debt securities from trading to the
available-for-sale category effective August 1, 2008 in accordance with
the Amendments to CICA Section 3855, Financial Instruments – Recognition
and Measurement and Section 3862, Financial Instruments – Disclosure.

On August 1, 2008, the fair value of debt securities reclassified from
trading to available-for-sale was $6,979 million. In addition, on the
date of reclassification, these debt securities had a weighted average
effective interest rate of 6.99% with expected recoverable cash flows, on
an undiscounted basis, of $9,732 million. The fair value of the
reclassified debt securities was $6,992 million as at April 30, 2009
(October 31, 2008 – $7,355 million). During the three and six months
ended April 30, 2009, net interest income of $108 million and
$214 million after tax, respectively (three months ended October 31, 2008
- $110 million after tax), was recorded relating to the reclassified debt
securities. For the three and six months ended April 30, 2009, the
respective increase in fair value of $236 million and $171 million after
tax (three months ended October 31, 2008 – decrease of $561 million after
tax) for these securities was recorded in other comprehensive income. Had
the Bank not reclassified these debt securities, the change in the fair
value of these debt securities would have been included as part of
trading income, the impact of which would have resulted in an increase of
net income of $236 million and $171 million after tax, respectively, for
the three and six months ended April 30, 2009 (three months ended
October 31, 2008 – reduction of $561 million after tax). Included in the
impairment losses on available-for-sale securities disclosed above,
$34 million and $85 million, for the three and six months ended April 30,
2009, respectively (three months ended October 31, 2008 – nil), related
to debt securities in the reclassified portfolio. These losses were
primarily offset by gains on credit protection held which were recorded
in other income. For the three and six months ended April 30, 2008, the
Bank recognized the change in the fair value of these debt securities in
its trading income.

Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available-for-Sale Securities
————————————————————————-
As at
—————————————-
Apr. 30, 2009
—————————————-
Gross     Gross
Cost/   unreal-   unreal-
amortized      ized      ized      Fair
(millions of Canadian dollars)        cost     gains    losses     value
————————————————————————-
Government and government-
related securities
Canadian government debt
Federal                           $8,951       $24        $-    $8,975
Provinces                            298        12         -       310
U.S. Federal, state and
municipal governments
and agencies debt                  16,517       148        47    16,618
Other OECD government
guaranteed debt                    10,882         1        36    10,847
Mortgage-backed securities          28,758       616       636    28,738
————————————————————————-
65,406       801       719    65,488
————————————————————————-
Other debt securities
Asset-backed securities             11,180         2       430    10,752
Non-agency collateralized
mortgage obligation portfolio       9,693         -     1,479     8,214
Corporate and other debt             3,099        94        59     3,134
————————————————————————-
23,972        96     1,968    22,100
————————————————————————-
Bonds reclassified
from trading(2)                     7,550        42       600     6,992
————————————————————————-
Equity securities(3)
Preferred shares                       389        57        43       403
Common shares                        1,586       309       197     1,698
————————————————————————-
1,975       366       240     2,101
————————————————————————-
Total                              $98,903    $1,305    $3,527   $96,681
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
Total carrying value                                             $96,481
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

————————————————————————-
As at
—————————————-
Oct. 31, 2008(1)
—————————————-
Gross     Gross
Cost/   unreal-   unreal-
amortized      ized      ized      Fair
(millions of Canadian dollars)        cost     gains    losses     value
————————————————————————-
Government and government-
related securities
Canadian government debt
Federal                          $10,363       $14        $2   $10,375
Provinces                            231         3         1       233
U.S. Federal, state and
municipal governments
and agencies debt                   5,295        12       149     5,158
Other OECD government
guaranteed debt                        22         -         -        22
Mortgage-backed securities          29,118       401       728    28,791
————————————————————————-
45,029       430       880    44,579
————————————————————————-
Other debt securities
Asset-backed securities              9,178         1       290     8,889
Non-agency collateralized
mortgage obligation portfolio       9,329        11       905     8,435
Corporate and other debt             2,601         1        40     2,562
————————————————————————-
21,108        13     1,235    19,886
————————————————————————-
Bonds reclassified
from trading(2)                     8,219     2,154     3,018     7,355
————————————————————————-
Equity securities(3)
Preferred shares                       452        70        22       500
Common shares                        2,791       540       244     3,087
————————————————————————-
3,243       610       266     3,587
————————————————————————-
Total                              $77,599    $3,207    $5,399   $75,407
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
Total carrying value                                             $75,121
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1) Certain comparative amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
current period’s presentation.
(2) Includes fair value of government and government-insured securities
of $39 million (Oct. 31, 2008 – $41 million) and other debt
securities of $6,953 million (Oct. 31, 2008 – $7,314 million).
(3) Equity securities in the available-for-sale portfolio with a carrying
value of $1,576 million (Oct. 31, 2008 – $1,496 million) do not have
quoted market prices and are carried at cost. The fair value of these
equity securities was $1,776 million (Oct. 31, 2008 – $1,782 million)
and is included in the table above.

Note 3: ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES AND LOANS PAST DUE BUT NOT IMPAIRED
————————————————————————-

The Bank maintains an allowance it considers adequate to absorb all
credit-related losses in a portfolio of instruments that are both on and
off the Interim Consolidated Balance Sheet. The allowance for loan
losses, which includes allowance for deposits with banks, mortgages,
acceptances and loans other than loans designated as trading under the
fair value option, is deducted from loans on the Interim Consolidated
Balance Sheet. The allowance for credit losses for off-balance sheet
instruments, which relate to certain guarantees, letters of credit and
undrawn lines of credit, is recorded in other liabilities. The change in
the Bank’s allowance for credit losses for the six months ended April 30
is shown in the following table.

Allowance for Credit Losses
————————————————————————-
Apr. 30, 2009                 Apr. 30, 2008
————————————————————
(millions of
Canadian     Specific   General            Specific   General
dollars)    allowance allowance     Total allowance allowance     Total
————————————————————————-
Allowance for
credit losses
at beginning
of year          $352    $1,184    $1,536      $203    $1,092    $1,295
Impact due to
reporting-period
alignment of
U.S. entities(1)   22        29        51         -         -         -
Provision for
credit losses     783       410     1,193       446        41       487
Write-offs        (707)        -      (707)     (470)        -      (470)
Recoveries          49         -        49        65         -        65
Foreign exchange
and other
adjustments(2)     18        38        56        11       (19)       (8)
————————————————————————-
Allowance for
credit losses at
end of period    $517    $1,661    $2,178      $255    $1,114    $1,369
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
Consisting of:
Allowance for
loan losses(3)   $517    $1,399    $1,916      $255    $1,114    $1,369
Allowance for
credit losses
for off-balance
sheet
instruments(3)      -       262       262         -         -         -
————————————————————————-
Allowance for
credit losses at
end of period    $517    $1,661    $2,178      $255    $1,114    $1,369
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1) The impact due to alignment of reporting period of U.S. entities
consists of the following: provision for credit losses – $80 million;
write-offs – $35 million; recoveries – nil; and other – $6 million.
(2) Includes foreign exchange rate changes, net of losses on loan sales.
(3) Effective April 30, 2009, the allowance for credit losses for
off-balance sheet instruments is recorded in other liabilities. Prior
period balances have not been reclassified.

Loans Past Due but not Impaired

A loan is classified as past due when a borrower has failed to make a
payment by the contractual due date, taking into account the grace
period, if applicable. The grace period represents the additional time
period beyond the contractual due date during which a borrower may make
the payment without the loan being classified as past due. The grace
period varies depending on the product type and the borrower.

The table below represents loans that are past due but not impaired. With
the exception of U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking, these amounts
exclude loans that fall within the allowed grace period. U.S Personal and
Commercial Banking may grant a grace period of up to 15 days. There were
$2.2 billion as at April 30, 2009 (October 31, 2008 – $2.6 billion) of
U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking loans that were past due up to
15 days and are included in the 1-30 days category in the table below.

Loans Past Due but not Impaired
————————————————————————-
As at
—————————————-
Apr. 30, 2009
—————————————-
1-30     31-60     61-89
(millions of Canadian dollars)        days      days      days     Total
————————————————————————-
Residential mortgages                 $809      $342       $84    $1,235
Consumer installment and
other personal                      3,546       531       173     4,250
Credit card                            352        79        48       479
Business and government              2,259       318       194     2,771
————————————————————————-
Total                               $6,966    $1,270      $499    $8,735
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

————————————————————————-
As at
—————————————-
Oct. 31, 2008
—————————————-
1-30     31-60     61-89
(millions of Canadian dollars)        days      days      days     Total
————————————————————————-
Residential mortgages                 $811      $357       $64    $1,232
Consumer installment and
other personal                      3,234       570       131     3,935
Credit card                            381        75        41       497
Business and government              2,725       256        79     3,060
————————————————————————-
Total                               $7,151    $1,258      $315    $8,724
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

Note 4: LOAN SECURITIZATIONS
————————————————————————-

The following tables summarize the Bank’s securitization activity, for
its own assets securitized, for the three and six months ended April 30.
In most cases, the Bank retained responsibility for servicing the assets
securitized.

Securitization Activity
————————————————————————-
For the three months ended
——————————————————–
Apr. 30, 2009
——————————————————–
Residential                Credit Commercial
(millions of        mortgage   Personal       card   mortgage
Canadian dollars)     loans      loans      loans      loans      Total
————————————————————————-
Gross proceeds        $6,585       $644         $-         $-     $7,229
Retained interests       290          -          -          -        290
Cash flows received
on retained
interests                98         17          -          -        115
————————————————————————-

————————————————————————-
For the three months ended
——————————————————–
Apr. 30, 2008
——————————————————–
Residential                Credit Commercial
(millions of        mortgage   Personal       card   mortgage
Canadian dollars)     loans      loans      loans      loans      Total
————————————————————————-
Gross proceeds        $2,024     $1,291       $800         $-     $4,115
Retained interests        50         14          6          -         70
Cash flows received
on retained
interests                51         25         15          1         92
————————————————————————-

Securitization Activity
————————————————————————-
For the six months ended
——————————————————–
Apr. 30, 2009
——————————————————–
Residential                Credit Commercial
(millions of        mortgage   Personal       card   mortgage
Canadian dollars)     loans      loans      loans      loans      Total
————————————————————————-
Gross proceeds       $14,858     $1,723         $-         $-    $16,581
Retained interests       566          2          -          -        568
Cash flows received
on retained
interests               171         38          -          1        210
————————————————————————-

————————————————————————-
For the six months ended
——————————————————–
Apr. 30, 2008
——————————————————–
Residential                Credit Commercial
(millions of        mortgage   Personal       card   mortgage
Canadian dollars)     loans      loans      loans      loans      Total
————————————————————————-
Gross proceeds        $3,914     $2,744     $1,600         $-     $8,258
Retained interests        99         26         12          -        137
Cash flows received
on retained
interests               109         52         29          1        191
————————————————————————-

The following tables summarize the impact of securitizations on the
Bank’s Interim Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and six
months ended April 30.

Securitization Gains and Income on Retained Interests
————————————————————————-
For the three months ended
——————————————————–
Apr. 30, 2009
——————————————————–
Residential                Credit Commercial
(millions of        mortgage   Personal       card   mortgage
Canadian dollars)     loans      loans      loans      loans      Total
————————————————————————-
Gain on sale            $157         $-         $-         $-       $157
Income on retained
interests(1)             22          5          -          -         27
————————————————————————-
Total                   $179         $5         $-         $-       $184
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

————————————————————————-
For the three months ended
——————————————————–
Apr. 30, 2008
——————————————————–
Residential                Credit Commercial
(millions of        mortgage   Personal       card   mortgage
Canadian dollars)     loans      loans      loans      loans      Total
————————————————————————-
Gain on sale             $18        $14         $6         $-        $38
Income on retained
interests(1)             22          6         25          -         53
————————————————————————-
Total                    $40        $20        $31         $-        $91
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

Securitization Gains and Income on Retained Interests
————————————————————————-
For the six months ended
——————————————————–
Apr. 30, 2009
——————————————————–
Residential                Credit Commercial
(millions of        mortgage   Personal       card   mortgage
Canadian dollars)     loans      loans      loans      loans      Total
————————————————————————-
Gain on sale            $179         $2         $-         $-       $181
Income on retained
interests(1)             50         10          -          -         60
————————————————————————-
Total                   $229        $12         $-         $-       $241
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

————————————————————————-
For the six months ended
——————————————————–
Apr. 30, 2008
——————————————————–
Residential                Credit Commercial
(millions of        mortgage   Personal       card   mortgage
Canadian dollars)     loans      loans      loans      loans      Total
————————————————————————-
Gain on sale             $23        $26        $12         $-        $61
Income on retained
interests(1)             46         13         47          -        106
————————————————————————-
Total                    $69        $39        $59         $-       $167
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1) Income on retained interests excludes income arising from changes in
fair values. Unrealized gains and losses on retained interests
arising from changes in fair value are recorded in trading income.

The key assumptions used to value the retained interests at the date of
the securitization activities are as follows:

Key Assumptions
————————————————————————-
2009
———————————————
Residential                Credit Commercial
mortgage   Personal       card   mortgage
loans      loans      loans      loans
————————————————————————-
Prepayment rate(1)                18.6%       5.3%        n/a       5.2%
Excess spread(2)                    1.2        0.3        n/a        1.0
Discount rate                       3.1        3.4        n/a        6.2
Expected credit losses(3)             -          -        n/a        0.1
————————————————————————-

————————————————————————-
2008
———————————————
Residential                Credit Commercial
mortgage   Personal       card   mortgage
loans      loans      loans      loans
————————————————————————-
Prepayment rate(1)                18.5%       6.1%      43.5%       8.7%
Excess spread(2)                    0.9        1.1        7.1        1.0
Discount rate                       5.2        5.9        6.1        7.5
Expected credit losses(3)             -          -        2.4        0.1
————————————————————————-
(1) Represents monthly payment rate for secured personal and credit card
loans.
(2) The excess spread for credit card loans reflects the net portfolio
yield, which is interest earned less funding costs and losses.
(3) There are no expected credit losses for residential mortgage loans as
the loans are government-guaranteed.

During the three months ended April 30, 2009, there were maturities of
previously securitized loans and receivables of $644 million (three
months ended April 30, 2008 – $2,591 million). Proceeds from new
securitizations were $6,585 million for the three months ended April 30,
2009 (three months ended April 30, 2008 – $1,524 million). During the six
months ended April 30, 2009, there were maturities of previously
securitized loans and receivables of $1,723 million (six months ended
April 30, 2008 – $4,844 million). Proceeds from new securitizations were
$14,858 million for the six months ended April 30, 2009 (six months ended
April 30, 2008 – $3,414 million).

Note 5: LIABILITY FOR PREFERRED SHARES
————————————————————————-

The Bank’s liability for preferred shares is as follows:

Preferred Shares
————————————————————————-
As at
———————
Apr. 30   Oct. 31
(millions of Canadian dollars)                            2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Preferred shares issued by the Bank
(thousands of shares):
Class A – 14,000 Series M                                 $350      $350
Class A – 8,000 Series N                                   200       200
————————————————————————-
Total liability for preferred shares                      $550      $550
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

Note 6: CAPITAL TRUST SECURITIES
————————————————————————-

The following table summarizes the Capital Trust Securities issued by
the Trusts that were established by the Bank.

Capital Trust Securities
————————————————————————-
As at
———————
Apr. 30   Oct. 31
(millions of Canadian dollars)                            2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Trust units issued by TD Capital Trust
(thousands of units)
900 Capital Trust Securities – Series 2009(1)           $900      $894

Trust units issued by TD Capital Trust II(2)
(thousands of units)
350 TD Capital Trust II Securities – Series 2012-1       350       350

Trust units issued by TD Capital Trust III
(thousands of units)
1,000 TD Capital Trust III Securities – Series 2008(3)   990       990

Debt issued by TD Capital Trust IV(2)
(thousands of units)
550 TD Capital Trust IV Notes – Series 1                 550         -
450 TD Capital Trust IV Notes – Series 2                 450         -
————————————————————————-
(1) Included in liability for Capital Trust Securities on the Interim
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(2) Trust II & Trust IV are variable interest entities. As the Bank is
not the primary beneficiary of the trusts, the Bank does not
consolidate them. The senior deposit notes that were issued to
Trust II & Trust IV are reflected in deposits on the Interim
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(3) Included in non-controlling interest in subsidiaries on the Interim
Consolidated Balance Sheet. See Note 7.

TD Capital IV Notes

On January 26, 2009, TD Capital Trust IV (Trust IV), a trust established
under the laws of the Province of Ontario, issued $550,000,000 of 9.523%
TD Capital Trust IV Notes – Series 1 due June 30, 2108 (TD CaTS IV -
Series 1) and $450,000,000 of 10.00% TD Capital Trust IV Notes – Series 2
due June 30, 2108 (TD CaTS IV – Series 2) (collectively, the TD CaTS IV
Notes). The proceeds from the issuance were invested in Bank deposits. TD
CaTS IV Notes qualify as Tier 1 capital of the Bank.

TD CaTS IV – Series 1 will pay interest, at a rate of 9.523%, in equal
semi-annual instalments on June 30 and December 31 of each year until
June 30, 2019. Starting on June 30, 2019 and on every fifth anniversary
thereafter until June 30, 2104 (Series 1 Interest Reset Date), the
interest rate on the TD CaTS IV – Series 1 will reset to equal the
Government of Canada (GOC) yield plus 10.125%. TD CaTS IV – Series 2 will
pay interest, at a rate of 10.00%, in equal semi-annual instalments on
June 30 and December 31 of each year until June 30, 2039. Starting on
June 30, 2039 and on every fifth anniversary thereafter until June 30,
2104 (Series 2 Interest Reset Date), the interest rate on the TD CaTS IV
- Series 2 will reset to equal the GOC yield plus 9.735%.

On or after June 30, 2014, the Trust may redeem the TD CaTS IV – Series
1, subject to regulatory consent, for a price per $1,000 principal amount
of TD CaTS IV – Series 1 redeemed (a) on any day that is not a Series 1
Interest Reset Date equal to the greater of par and a price calculated to
provide an annual yield equal to the yield of a GOC bond maturing on the
next Series 1 Interest Reset Date plus (i) 1.6875% if the redemption date
is prior to June 30, 2019 or (ii) 3.375% if the redemption date is on or
after June 30, 2019 or (b) on a Series 1 Interest Reset Date equal to
par, together in each case with accrued and unpaid interest. On or after
June 30, 2014, the Trust may redeem the TD CaTS IV – Series 2, subject to
regulatory consent, for a price per $1,000 principal amount of TD CaTS IV
- Series 2 redeemed (a) on any day that is not a Series 2 Interest Reset
Date equal to the greater of par and a price calculated to provide an
annual yield equal to the yield of a GOC bond maturing on the next Series
2 Interest Reset Date plus (i) 1.62% if the redemption date is prior to
June 30, 2039 or (ii) 3.24% if the redemption date is on or after
June 30, 2039 or (b) on a Series 2 Interest Reset Date equal to par,
together in each case with accrued and unpaid interest.

Holders of TD CaTS IV Notes may, in certain circumstances, be required to
invest interest paid on the TD CaTS IV Notes in non-cumulative Class A
First Preferred Shares of the Bank. In addition, in certain
circumstances, the TD CaTS IV Notes will be exchanged automatically,
without the consent of the holders, for non-cumulative Class A First
Preferred Shares, Series A10 of the Bank.

Note 7: NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS IN SUBSIDIARIES
————————————————————————-
As at
———————
Apr. 30   Oct. 31
(millions of Canadian dollars)                            2009      2008
————————————————————————-
REIT preferred stock, Series A                            $586      $523
TD Capital Trust III Securities – Series 2008              990       990
Other                                                       45        47
————————————————————————-
Total non-controlling interests in subsidiaries         $1,621    $1,560
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

Note 8: SHARE CAPITAL
————————————————————————-

Shares Issued and Outstanding
————————————————————————-
Apr. 30, 2009       Apr. 30, 2008
—————————————–
(millions of shares and          Number of           Number of
millions of Canadian dollars)      shares    Amount    shares    Amount
————————————————————————-
Common shares:
Balance at beginning of year         810.1   $13,241     717.8    $6,577
Issued on exercise of stock
options                               0.8        45       1.4        71
Issued as a result of
dividend reinvestment plan            4.9       208       0.6        43
Issued for cash                       34.9     1,381         -         -
Issued on the acquisition
of Commerce                             -         -      83.3     6,147
Impact of shares acquired
for trading purposes(1)              (0.1)        -      (0.2)      (20)
————————————————————————-
Balance at end of period -
common shares                       850.6   $14,875     802.9   $12,818
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
Preferred shares (Class A):
Series O                              17.0      $425      17.0      $425
Series P                              10.0       250      10.0       250
Series Q                               8.0       200       8.0       200
Series R                              10.0       250      10.0       250
Series S                              10.0       250         -         -
Series Y                              10.0       250         -         -
Series AA                             10.0       250         -         -
Series AC                              8.8       220         -         -
Series AE                             12.0       300         -         -
Series AG                             15.0       375         -         -
Series AI                             11.0       275         -         -
Series AK                             14.0       350         -         -
————————————————————————-
Balance at end of period -
preferred shares                    135.8    $3,395      45.0    $1,125
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1) Purchased by subsidiaries of the Bank, which are regulated securities
entities in accordance with Regulation 92-313 under the Bank Act.

COMMON SHARES

On December 5, 2008, the Bank issued 35 million common shares for gross
cash consideration of $1.4 billion. The common share issue qualifies as
Tier 1 capital of the Bank.

PREFERRED SHARES

5-Year Rate Reset Preferred Shares, Series AC

On November 5, 2008, the Bank issued 8.8 million non-cumulative 5-Year
Rate Reset Preferred Shares, Series AC for gross cash consideration of
$220 million. Quarterly non-cumulative cash dividends, if declared, will
be paid at a per annum rate of 5.60% for the initial period from and
including November 5, 2008 to but excluding January 31, 2014. Thereafter,
the dividend rate will reset every five years to equal the then five year
Government of Canada bond yield plus 2.74%. Holders of the Series AC
shares will have the right to convert their shares into non-cumulative
Floating Rate Preferred Shares, Series AD, subject to certain conditions,
on January 31, 2014, and on January 31 every five years thereafter and
vice versa. The Series AC shares are redeemable by the Bank for cash,
subject to regulatory consent, at $25.00 per share on January 31, 2014
and on January 31 every five years thereafter. The Series AC shares
qualify as Tier 1 capital of the Bank.

5-Year Rate Reset Preferred Shares, Series AE

On January 14, 2009, the Bank issued 12 million non-cumulative 5-Year
Rate Reset Preferred Shares, Series AE for gross cash consideration of
$300 million. Quarterly non-cumulative cash dividends, if declared, will
be paid at a per annum rate of 6.25% for the initial period from and
including January 14, 2009 to but excluding April 30, 2014. Thereafter,
the dividend rate will reset every five years to equal the then five year
Government of Canada bond yield plus 4.37%. Holders of the Series AE
shares will have the right to convert their shares into non-cumulative
Floating Rate Class A Preferred Shares, Series AF, subject to certain
conditions, on April 30, 2014, and on April 30 every five years
thereafter and vice versa. The Series AE shares are redeemable by the
Bank for cash, subject to regulatory consent, at $25.00 per share on
April 30, 2014 and on April 30 every five years thereafter. The Series AE
shares qualify as Tier 1 capital of the Bank.

5-Year Rate Reset Preferred Shares, Series AG

On January 30, 2009, the Bank issued 15 million non-cumulative 5-Year
Rate Reset Preferred Shares, Series AG for gross cash consideration of
$375 million. Quarterly non-cumulative cash dividends, if declared, will
be paid at a per annum rate of 6.25% for the initial period from and
including January 30, 2009 to but excluding April 30, 2014. Thereafter,
the dividend rate will reset every five years to equal the then five year
Government of Canada bond yield plus 4.38%. Holders of the Series AG
shares will have the right to convert their shares into non-cumulative
Floating Rate Class A Preferred Shares, Series AH, subject to certain
conditions, on April 30, 2014, and on April 30 every five years
thereafter and vice versa. The Series AG shares are redeemable by the
Bank for cash, subject to regulatory consent, at $25.00 per share on
April 30, 2014 and on April 30 every five years thereafter. The Series AG
shares qualify as Tier 1 capital of the Bank.

5-Year Rate Reset Preferred Shares, Series AI

On March 6, 2009, the Bank issued 11 million non-cumulative 5-Year Rate
Reset Preferred Shares, Series AI for gross cash consideration of
$275 million. Quarterly non-cumulative cash dividends, if declared, will
be paid at a per annum rate of 6.25% for the initial period from and
including March 6, 2009 to but excluding July 31, 2014. Thereafter, the
dividend rate will reset every five years to equal the then five year
Government of Canada bond yield plus 4.15%. Holders of the Series AI
shares will have the right to convert their shares into non-cumulative
Floating Rate Class A Preferred Shares, Series AJ, subject to certain
conditions, on July 31, 2014, and on July 31 every five years thereafter
and vice versa. The Series AI shares are redeemable by the Bank for cash,
subject to regulatory consent, at $25.00 per share on July 31, 2014 and
on July 31 every five years thereafter. The Series AI shares qualify as
Tier 1 capital of the Bank.

5-Year Rate Reset Preferred Shares, Series AK

On April 3, 2009, the Bank issued 14 million non-cumulative 5-Year Rate
Reset Preferred Shares, Series AK for gross cash consideration of
$350 million. Quarterly non-cumulative cash dividends, if declared, will
be paid at a per annum rate of 6.25% for the initial period from and
including April 3, 2009 to but excluding July 31, 2014. Thereafter, the
dividend rate will reset every five years to equal the then five year
Government of Canada bond yield plus 4.33%. Holders of the Series AK
shares will have the right to convert their shares into non-cumulative
Floating Rate Class A Preferred Shares, Series AL, subject to certain
conditions, on July 31, 2014, and on July 31 every five years thereafter
and vice versa. The Series AK shares are redeemable by the Bank for cash,
subject to regulatory consent, at $25.00 per share on July 31, 2014 and
on July 31 every five years thereafter. The Series AK shares qualify as
Tier 1 capital of the Bank.

Note 9: REGULATORY CAPITAL
————————————————————————-

The Bank manages its capital under guidelines established by the Office
of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada (OSFI). The
regulatory capital guidelines measure capital in relation to credit,
market and operational risks. The Bank has various capital policies,
procedures and controls which it utilizes to achieve its goals and
objectives. Effective April 30, 2009 for accounting purposes, and
effective October 31, 2008 for regulatory reporting purposes, the
reporting period of the U.S. entities was aligned with the rest of the
Bank. Prior to April 30, 2009 and October 31, 2008, the Bank’s financial
statements and regulatory capital, respectively, were calculated
incorporating TD Banknorth and Commerce on a one month lag.

During the six months ended April 30, 2009, the Bank complied with the
OSFI guideline related to capital ratios and the assets-to-capital
multiple. This guideline is based on the “International Convergence of
Capital Measurement and Capital Standards – A Revised Framework” (Basel
II) issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Effective
November 1, 2008, substantial investments held prior to January 1, 2007,
which were previously deducted from Tier 2 capital, are deducted 50% from
Tier 1 capital and 50% from Tier 2 capital. Insurance subsidiaries
continue to be deconsolidated and reported as a deduction from Tier 2
capital.

The Bank’s regulatory capital position was as follows:

As at
————————
Apr. 30   Oct. 31
(millions of Canadian dollars)                            2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Tier 1 capital                                         $21,778   $20,679
Tier 1 capital ratio(1)                                  10.9%      9.8%
Total capital(2)                                       $28,216   $25,348
Total capital ratio(3)                                   14.1%     12.0%
Assets-to-capital multiple(4)                             17.1      19.3
————————————————————————-
(1) Tier 1 capital ratio is calculated as Tier 1 capital divided by risk-
weighted assets (RWA).
(2) Total capital includes Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital.
(3) Total capital ratio is calculated as Total capital divided by RWA.
(4) The assets-to-capital multiple is calculated as total assets plus
off-balance sheet credit instruments, such as certain letters of
credit and guarantees, less investments in associated corporations,
goodwill and net intangibles, divided by Total adjusted capital.

OSFI’s target Tier 1 and Total capital ratios for Canadian banks are 7%
and 10%, respectively.

Note 10: ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
————————————————————————-

The following table summarizes the Bank’s accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss), net of income taxes, as at April 30:

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Income Taxes
————————————————————————-
As at
————————-
Apr. 30   Oct. 31
(millions of Canadian dollars)                          2009(1)     2008
————————————————————————-
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities,
net of hedging activities                             $(1,376)  $(1,409)
Unrealized foreign currency translation gain (loss)
on investments in subsidiaries, net of hedging
activities                                              1,462    (1,633)
Gain on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges       2,882     1,393
————————————————————————-
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) balance
as at end of period                                    $2,968   $(1,649)
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1) This included the impact of other comprehensive income of U.S.
entities for January 2009, as explained in Note 1, and consists of
the following: unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net
of hedging activities – $199 million; unrealized foreign currency
translation gains on investments in subsidiaries, net of hedging
activities – $166 million; and losses on derivatives designated as
cash flow hedges – $(36) million.

Note 11: STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
————————————————————————-

For the three and six months ended April 30, 2009, the Bank recognized
compensation expense for stock option awards of $11 million and
$17 million, respectively (three and six months ended April 30, 2008 -
$6 million and $11 million, respectively).

During the three months ended April 30, 2009, 0.6 million (three months
ended April 30, 2008 – nil) options were granted by the Bank with a
weighted average fair value of $6.85 per option (three months ended April
30, 2008 – n/a). During the six months ended April 30, 2009, 4 million
(six months ended April 30, 2008 – 2 million) options were granted by the
Bank with a weighted average fair value of $7.62 per option (six months
ended April 30, 2008 – $10.80 per option).

The fair value of options granted was estimated at the date of grant
using a binomial tree-based valuation model. The following assumptions
were used:

For the six months ended
—————————–
Apr. 30   Apr. 30
2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Risk-free interest rate                                   2.2%      3.8%
Expected option life                                 5.6 years 5.5 years
Expected volatility                                      23.9%     15.9%
Expected dividend yield                                  3.00%     2.85%
————————————————————————-

Note 12: EMPLOYEE FUTURE BENEFITS
————————————————————————-

The expenses for the Bank’s pension plans and principal non-pension post-
retirement benefit plan are as follows:

Principal Pension Plan Pension Expense
————————————————————————-
For the three         For the six
months ended        months ended
—————————————
Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
(millions of Canadian dollars)        2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Elements of pension plan expense
before adjustments to recognize
the long term nature of the cost:
Service cost – benefits earned       $12       $21       $32       $37
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation                   34        33        70        63
Actual return on plan assets          83       110       410       107
Plan amendments                        -         -         -         7
Adjustments to recognize the
long-term nature of plan cost:
Difference between costs arising
in the period and costs
recognized in the period
in respect of:
Return on plan assets(1)          (114)     (148)     (478)     (183)
Actuarial losses(2)                  2         5         5         5
Plan amendments(3)                   6         2        11        (2)
————————————————————————-
Total                                  $23       $23       $50       $34
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1) For the three months ended April 30, 2009, includes expected return
on plan assets of $31 million (three months ended April 30, 2008 -
$38 million) less actual return on plan assets of $(83) million
(three months ended April 30, 2008 – $(110) million). For the six
months ended April 30, 2009, includes expected return on plan assets
of $68 million (six months ended April 30, 2008 – $76 million) less
actual return on plan assets of $(410) million (six months ended
April 30, 2008 – $(107) million).
(2) For the three months ended April 30, 2009, includes loss recognized
of $2 million (three months ended April 30, 2008 – $5 million) less
actuarial losses on projected benefit obligation of nil (three months
ended April 30, 2008 – nil). For the six months ended April 30, 2009,
includes loss recognized of $5 million (six months ended April 30,
2008 – $5 million) less actuarial losses on projected benefit
obligation of nil (six months ended April 30, 2008 – nil).
(3) For the three months ended April 30, 2009, includes amortization of
costs for plan amendments of $6 million (three months ended April 30,
2008 – $2 million) less actual cost amendments of nil (three months
ended April 30, 2008 – nil). For the six months ended April 30, 2009,
includes amortization of costs for plan amendments of $11 million
(six months ended April 30, 2008 – $5 million) less actual cost
amendments of nil (six months ended April 30, 2008 – $7 million).

Other Pension Plans’ Expense
————————————————————————-
For the three         For the six
months ended        months ended
—————————————
Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
(millions of Canadian dollars)        2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
CT defined benefit pension plan         $1        $1        $2        $2
TD Banknorth defined benefit
pension plan(1)                         3         1         5         -
Supplemental employee
retirement plans                        7         8        16        16
————————————————————————-
Total                                  $11       $10       $23       $18
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1) TD Banknorth defined benefit plan was frozen as of December 31, 2008,
and no service credits can be earned after that date.

Principal Non-Pension Post-Retirement Benefit Plan Expense
————————————————————————-
For the three         For the six
months ended        months ended
—————————————
Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
(millions of Canadian dollars)        2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Elements of non-pension plan
expense before adjustments
to recognize the long-term
nature of the cost:
Service cost – benefits
earned                             $2        $3        $4        $6
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation                  5         5        10        11
Adjustments to recognize the
long-term nature of plan cost:
Difference between costs
arising in the period and
costs recognized in the
period in respect of:
Actuarial losses                     -         2         -         3
Plan amendments                     (2)       (2)       (3)       (3)
————————————————————————-
Total                                   $5        $8       $11       $17
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

Cash Flows

The Bank’s contributions to its pension plans and its principal non-
pension post-retirement benefit plan are as follows:

Plan Contributions
————————————————————————-
For the three         For the six
months ended        months ended
—————————————
Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
(millions of Canadian dollars)        2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Principal pension plan                 $28       $18       $49       $37
Supplemental employee
retirement plans                        3         3         6         7
Non-pension post-retirement
benefit plan                            2         2         4         4
————————————————————————-
Total                                  $33       $23       $59       $48
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

As at April 30, 2009, the Bank expects to contribute an additional $142
million to its principal pension plan, nil to its CT defined benefit
pension plan, nil to its TD Banknorth defined benefit pension plan, $5
million to its supplemental employee retirement plans and $5 million to
its non-pension post-retirement benefit plan by the end of the year.
However, future contribution amounts may change upon the Bank’s review of
the current contribution levels during the year.

Note 13: EARNINGS PER SHARE
————————————————————————-

The Bank’s basic and diluted earnings per share at April 30 are as
follows:

Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share
————————————————————————-
For the three         For the six
months ended        months ended
—————————————
Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Basic earnings per share
Net income available to
common shareholders ($ millions)     $577      $841    $1,260    $1,803
Average number of common shares
outstanding (millions)              848.8     747.7     840.6     732.9
Basic earnings per share ($)         $0.68     $1.12     $1.50     $2.46
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
Diluted earnings per share
Net income available to
common shareholders ($ millions)     $577      $841    $1,260    $1,803
————————————————————————-
Average number of common shares
outstanding (millions)              848.8     747.7     840.6     732.9
Stock options potentially
exercisable as determined
under the treasury stock
method(1)(millions)                   1.0       6.0       1.3       6.1
————————————————————————-
Average number of common shares
outstanding – diluted (millions)    849.8     753.7     841.9     739.0
————————————————————————-
Diluted earnings per share(1) ($)    $0.68     $1.12     $1.50     $2.44
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1) For the six months ended April 30, 2009, the computation of diluted
earnings per share excluded weighted-average options outstanding of
18.8 million with a weighted-average exercise price of $63.79 as the
option price was greater than the average market price of the Bank’s
common shares. For the six months ended April 30, 2008, the
computation of diluted earnings per share excluded weighted-average
options outstanding of 3.4 million with a weighted-average exercise
price of $69.49 as the option price was greater than the average
market price of the Bank’s common shares.

Note 14: SEGMENTED INFORMATION
————————————————————————-

The Bank’s operations and activities are organized around the following
operating business segments: Canadian Personal and Commercial Banking,
Wealth Management, U.S. Personal and Commercial Banking and Wholesale
Banking. Results for these segments for the three and six months ended
April 30 are presented in the following tables:

Results by Business Segment
————————————————————————-
U.S.
Canadian Personal                    Personal and
(millions of              and Commercial          Wealth      Commercial
Canadian dollars)            Banking(1)   Management(1) Banking(1)(2)(3)
————————————————————————-
Apr.    Apr.    Apr.    Apr.    Apr.    Apr.
For the three                 30      30      30      30      30      30
months ended               2009    2008    2009    2008    2009    2008
————————————————————————-
Net interest income       $1,536  $1,402     $63     $82  $1,002    $309
Other income                 740     732     465     476     279     166
————————————————————————-
Total revenue              2,276   2,134     528     558   1,281     475
Provision for
(reversal of)
credit losses               286     191       -       -     201      46
Non-interest expenses      1,143   1,095     414     387     823     294
————————————————————————-
Income (loss) before
income taxes                847     848     114     171     257     135
Provision for
(recovery of)
income taxes                258     266      36      56      26      35
Non-controlling
interests in
subsidiaries, net of
income taxes                  -       -       -       -       -       -
Equity in net income
of an associated
company, net of
income taxes                  -       -      48      67       -       -
————————————————————————-
Net income (loss)           $589    $582    $126    $182    $231    $100
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
Total assets
(billions of Canadian
dollars)
- balance sheet         $172.5  $159.9   $18.9   $15.6  $150.6  $120.7
- securitized             52.3    42.0       -       -       -       -
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

————————————————————————-
(millions of                   Wholesale
Canadian dollars)             Banking(4)    Corporate(4)          Total
————————————————————————-
Apr.    Apr.    Apr.    Apr.    Apr.    Apr.
For the three                 30      30      30      30      30      30
months ended               2009    2008    2009    2008    2009    2008
————————————————————————-
Net interest income         $662    $314   $(323)  $(249) $2,940  $1,858
Other income                 (42)    114     (57)     42   1,385   1,530
————————————————————————-
Total revenue                620     428    (380)   (207)  4,325   3,388
Provision for
(reversal of)
credit losses                59      10     110     (15)    656     232
Non-interest expenses        356     291     315     139   3,051   2,206
————————————————————————-
Income (loss) before
income taxes                205     127    (805)   (331)    618     950
Provision for
(recovery of)
income taxes                 32      34    (317)   (231)     35     160
Non-controlling
interests in
subsidiaries, net of
income taxes                  -       -      28       9      28       9
Equity in net income
of an associated
company, net of
income taxes                  -       -      15       4      63      71
————————————————————————-
Net income (loss)           $173     $93   $(501)  $(105)   $618    $852
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
Total assets
(billions of Canadian
dollars)
- balance sheet         $192.1  $186.5   $40.8   $20.9  $574.9  $503.6
- securitized              3.6     3.0   (13.6)  (15.0)   42.3    30.0
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

Results by Business Segment
————————————————————————-
U.S.
Canadian Personal                    Personal and
(millions of              and Commercial          Wealth      Commercial
Canadian dollars)            Banking(1)   Management(1) Banking(1)(2)(3)
————————————————————————-
Apr.    Apr.    Apr.    Apr.    Apr.    Apr.
For the six                   30      30      30      30      30      30
months ended               2009    2008    2009    2008    2009    2008
————————————————————————-
Net interest income       $3,030  $2,816    $138    $170  $1,894    $621
Other income               1,538   1,465     918     958     581     306
————————————————————————-
Total revenue              4,568   4,281   1,056   1,128   2,475     927
Provision for
(reversal of)
credit losses               552     363       -       -     340      72
Non-interest expenses      2,329   2,191     833     766   1,624     532
————————————————————————-
Income (loss) before
income taxes              1,687   1,727     223     362     511     323
Provision for
(recovery of)
income taxes                514     547      70     119      40      96
Non-controlling interests
in subsidiaries, net
of income taxes               -       -       -       -       -       -
Equity in net income
of an associated
company, net of
income taxes                  -       -     125     155       -       -
————————————————————————-

Net income (loss)         $1,173  $1,180    $278    $398    $471    $227
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

————————————————————————-
(millions of                   Wholesale
Canadian dollars)             Banking(4)    Corporate(4)          Total
————————————————————————-
Apr.    Apr.    Apr.    Apr.    Apr.    Apr.
For the six                   30      30      30      30      30      30
months ended               2009    2008    2009    2008    2009    2008
————————————————————————-
Net interest income       $1,382    $506   $(776)  $(467) $5,668  $3,646
Other income                  77     530    (307)     87   2,807   3,346
————————————————————————-
Total revenue              1,459   1,036  (1,083)   (380)  8,475   6,992
Provision for
(reversal of)
credit losses               125      66     176     (14)  1,193     487
Non-interest expenses        744     612     541     333   6,071   4,434
————————————————————————-
Income (loss) before
income taxes                590     358  (1,800)   (699)  1,211   2,071
Provision for
(recovery of)
income taxes                152     102    (799)   (469)    (23)    395
Non-controlling interests
in subsidiaries, net
of income taxes               -       -      56      17      56      17
Equity in net income
of an associated
company, net of
income taxes                  -       -      27       8     152     163
————————————————————————-
Net income (loss)           $438    $256 $(1,030)  $(239) $1,330  $1,822
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1) Effective the third quarter ended July 31, 2008, the Bank transferred
the U.S. insurance and credit card businesses to the Canadian
Personal and Commercial Banking segment, and the U.S. wealth
management businesses to the Wealth Management segment for management
reporting purposes. Prior periods have not been reclassified as the
impact was not material to segment results.
(2) Commencing the third quarter ended July 31, 2008, the results of U.S.
Personal and Commercial Banking segment include Commerce. For
details, see Note 31 to the 2008 Annual Report.
(3) As explained in Note 1, effective the three months ended April 30,
2009, as a result of the alignment of reporting period of the U.S.
entities, TD Banknorth and Commerce are consolidated using the same
period as the Bank.
(4) The taxable equivalent basis increase to net interest income and
provision for income taxes, reflected in the Wholesale Banking
segment results, is reversed in the Corporate segment.

Note 15: HEDGE ACCOUNTING
————————————————————————-

Hedge accounting results were as follows:

Hedge Accounting Results
————————————————————————-
For the three         For the six
months ended        months ended
—————————————
Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
(millions of Canadian dollars)        2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Fair value hedges
Gain arising from hedge
ineffectiveness                      $2.7      $1.7     $19.8      $8.6
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
Cash flow hedges
(Loss) gain arising from hedge
ineffectiveness                     $(4.7)     $1.7     $(4.6)     $1.4
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-

Portions of derivative gains (losses) that were excluded from the
assessment of hedge effectiveness for fair value and cash flow hedging
activities and the change in fair value related to these portions in each
period are included in the Interim Consolidated Statement of Income. The
effect of this exclusion was not significant for the three and six months
ended April 30, 2009.

During the six months ended April 30, 2009, there were no firm
commitments that no longer qualified as hedges.

Over the next twelve months, the Bank expects approximately $1.5
billion in net gains reported in other comprehensive income as at April
30, 2009 to be reclassified to net income. The maximum length of time
over which the Bank is hedging its exposure to the variability in future
cash flows from anticipated transactions is 30 years. During the six
months ended April 30, 2009, there were no forecasted transactions that
failed to occur.

Note 16: RESTRUCTURING AND INTEGRATION CHARGES
————————————————————————-

As a result of the acquisition of Commerce and related restructuring and
integration initiatives undertaken, the Bank incurred integration charges
of $77 million and $79 million during the three months ended April 30,
2009 and January 31, 2009, respectively. Integration charges consisted of
costs related to resources dedicated to the integration, employee
retention, external professional consulting charges, marketing (including
customer communication and rebranding) and integration related travel
costs. In the Interim Consolidated Statement of Income, the integration
charges are included in other non-interest expenses.

For the three months ended January 31, 2009, the Bank incurred $27
million of restructuring charges. Restructuring charges consisted of
estimated lease termination costs for approximately 50 legacy TD
Banknorth branches that were closed and consolidated with nearby branches
in connection with the Commerce merger. In the Interim Consolidated
Statement of Income, the restructuring charges are included in
restructuring costs. No restructuring charges were recorded in the three
months ended April 30, 2009. As at April 30 2009, the remaining balance
of the restructuring liability related to the acquisition of Commerce was
$36 million. Restructuring and integration charges included in the
Interim Consolidated Statement of Income are presented in the following
table:

Commerce Restructuring and Integration Charges
————————————————————————-
For the three         For the six
months ended        months ended
—————————————
Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30   Apr. 30
(millions of Canadian dollars)        2009      2008      2009      2008
————————————————————————-
Restructuring costs                     $-       $48       $27       $48
Integration charges(1)                  77         -       156         -
————————————————————————-
————————————————————————-
(1) These amounts do not include integration charges of $25 million
booked directly to retained earnings as a result of the alignment of
reporting period of U.S. entities, as explained in Note 1.

Note 17: OTHER NON-INTEREST EXPENSES
————————————————————————-

Other non-interest expenses include a charge for settlement of TD
Banknorth shareholder litigation. Upon the announcement of the
privatization of TD Banknorth in November 2006, certain minority
shareholders of TD Banknorth initiated class action litigation alleging
various claims against the Bank, TD Banknorth and TD Banknorth officers
and directors. The parties agreed to settle the litigation in February
2009 for $61.3 million (US$50 million) of which $3.7 million (US$3
million) had been previously accrued on privatization. A settlement
approval hearing with the Court of Chancery in Delaware is scheduled for
June 2009.

Note 18: ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS
————————————————————————-

Commerce Bancorp, Inc.

During the period from February 1, 2009 to April 30, 2009, goodwill
increased by $36 million to $6,274 million primarily due to the
establishment of a valuation allowance on future income tax assets
related to certain securities and the completion of the valuation of the
loan portfolio and a corresponding future income tax liability. The
purchase price allocation, including the valuation of the assets and
liabilities, is now complete.

TD AMERITRADE Holding Corporation

As at April 30, 2009, the Bank’s reported investment in TD AMERITRADE
Holding Corporation (TD Ameritrade) was 47.5% of the issued and
outstanding shares of TD Ameritrade.

On February 18, 2009, TD Ameritrade announced a common stock repurchase
program for an aggregate 34 million shares from its second largest
shareholder. As a result of TD Ameritrade’s repurchase activity, the
Bank’s ownership position in TD Ameritrade increased to 47.5% as at April
30, 2009 from 44.9% as at January 31, 2009. This level of ownership
interest is expected to be temporary as TD Ameritrade has announced that
it plans to issue shares in connection with its acquisition of
thinkorswim Group Inc. Upon completion of the issuance, the Bank will
conduct additional sales as required to bring the ownership interest
under the cap of 45% under the Stockholders’ Agreement.

On March 2, 2009, the Bank took delivery of 27 million shares in
settlement of its amended hedging arrangement with Lillooet Limited
(Lillooet) at a hedged cost to the Bank of US$515 million. As Lillooet
was consolidated in the Bank’s consolidated financial statements, the
replacement of the amended hedge arrangement with the direct ownership of
the 27 million shares had no material impact on the Bank.

Note 19: RISK MANAGEMENT
————————————————————————-

The risk management policies and procedures of the Bank are provided in
the MD&A. The shaded sections of the Managing Risk section, included on
pages 21 to 23 of the MD&A, relating to credit, market and liquidity
risks are an integral part of the Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements. For a complete discussion of our risk management policies and
procedures refer to the shaded sections presented on pages 68 to 76 of
the Bank’s 2008 Annual Report.

Note 20: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
————————————————————————-

FDIC Restoration Plan Charge

On May 22, 2009, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), in the
U.S., finalized a five basis points special assessment charge based on
total assets less Tier 1 capital of an institution insured under the FDIC
program as at June 30, 2009. The special assessment charge, of
approximately US$50 million, is payable by the Bank on September 30,
2009. The final rule adopted also provides the FDIC authority to charge
similar special assessments on December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010, if
needed, subject to additional FDIC Board approval at that time.

SHAREHOLDER AND INVESTOR INFORMATION

Shareholder Services

————————————————————————-

If you:               And your inquiry          Please contact:
relates to:
————————————————————————-
Are a registered         Missing dividends,       Transfer Agent:
shareholder (your        lost share certifi-      CIBC Mellon Trust
name appears on your     cates, estate ques-      Company
TD share certificate)    tions, address changes   P.O. Box 7010
to the share register,   Adelaide Street Postal
dividend bank account    Station
changes, the dividend    Toronto, Ontario
reinvestment plan, to    M5C 2W9
eliminate duplicate      416-643-5500
mailings of share-       or toll-free at
holder materials, or     1-800-387-0825
to stop (and resume)     inquiries@
receiving Annual and     cibcmellon.com or
Quarterly Reports.       www.cibcmellon.com
————————————————————————-
Hold your TD shares      Missing dividends,       Co-Transfer Agent and
through the Direct       lost share certifi-      Registrar:
Registration System in   cates, estate ques-      BNY Mellon Shareowner
the United States        tions, address changes   Services
to the share register,   P.O. Box 358015
to eliminate duplicate   Pittsburgh,
mailings of share-       Pennsylvania 15252-8015
holder materials, or     or 480 Washington
to stop (and resume)     Boulevard
receiving Annual and     Jersey City, New Jersey
Quarterly Reports.       07310
1-866-233-4836
TDD for hearing
impaired:
1-800-231-5469
Foreign shareholders:
201-680-6578
TDD foreign share-
holders: 201-680-6610
www.bnymellon.com/
shareowner
————————————————————————-
Beneficially own TD      Your TD shares,          Your intermediary
shares that are held     including questions
in the name of an        regarding the dividend
intermediary, such as    reinvestment plan and
a bank, a trust          mailings of share-
company, a securities    holder materials
broker or other
nominee
————————————————————————-

For all other shareholder inquiries, please contact TD Shareholder
Relations at 416-944-6367 or 1-866-756-8936 or email tdshinfo@td.com.
Please note that by leaving us an e-mail or voicemail message you are
providing your consent for us to forward your inquiry to the appropriate
party for response.

General Information

Contact Corporate & Public Affairs:
(416) 982-8578

Products and services: Contact TD Canada Trust, 24 hours a day, seven
days a week:
1-866-567-8888
French: 1-866-233-2323
Cantonese/Mandarin: 1-800-328-3698
Telephone device for the deaf: 1-800-361-1180

Internet website:http://www.td.com
Internet e-mail: customer.service@td.com

Quarterly Earnings Conference Call

TD Bank Financial Group will host an earnings conference call on May 28,
2009. The call will be webcast live via TDBFG’s website at 3 p.m. ET. The
call and webcast will feature presentations by TDBFG executives on the
Bank’s financial results for the second quarter, followed by a question-
and-answer period with analysts. The presentation material referenced
during the call will be available on the TDBFG website at
http://www.td.com/investor/earnings.jsp on May 28, 2009, before 12 p.m.
ET. A listen-only telephone line is available at 416-644-3416 or 1-800-
732-9307 (toll free).

The webcast and presentations will be archived at
http://www.td.com/investor/calendar_arch.jsp. Replay of the
teleconference will be available from 6 p.m. ET on May 28, 2009, until
June 29, 2009, by calling 416-640-1917 or 1-877-289-8525 (toll free). The
passcode is 21305246 followed by the number sign.

About TD Bank Financial Group

The Toronto-Dominion Bank and its subsidiaries are collectively known as
TD Bank Financial Group. TD Bank Financial Group is the sixth largest
bank in North America by branches and serves approximately 17 million
customers in four key businesses operating in a number of locations in
key financial centres around the globe: Canadian Personal and Commercial
Banking, including TD Canada Trust and TD Insurance; Wealth Management,
including TD Waterhouse and an investment in TD Ameritrade; U.S. Personal
and Commercial Banking through TD Banknorth and TD Bank, America’s Most
Convenient Bank; and Wholesale Banking, including TD Securities. TD Bank
Financial Group also ranks among the world’s leading online financial
services firms, with more than 5.5 million online customers. TD Bank
Financial Group had $575 billion in assets on April 30, 2009. The
Toronto-Dominion Bank trades under the symbol “TD” on the Toronto and New
York Stock Exchanges.

SOURCE TD Bank Financial Group

DemandTec Named Finalist for VICS Collaborative Commerce Achievement Awards
May 31st, 2009 by TopDollar

DemandTec Named Finalist for VICS Collaborative Commerce Achievement Awards

DemandTec customers also named as finalists for prestigious retail and consumer products industry awards

SAN CARLOS, Calif., May 28 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — DemandTec, Inc. (Nasdaq: DMAN), a leading provider of on-demand optimization solutions for retailers and consumer products manufacturers, has been named a finalist for the Voluntary Interindustry Commerce Solutions (VICS) Association’s 12th Annual Collaborative Commerce Achievement Awards. The company is a finalist in the Best Third-Party Technology Provider category. DemandTec customers are also finalists in the VICS CPFR(R) Implementation Excellence and Supply Chain Excellence categories.

The VICS Achievement Awards, which will be presented in conjunction with the annual VICS Board of Directors’ dinner on June 3, 2009 in Orlando, recognize the positive results of company-wide dedication to customer satisfaction that have made continuous improvements to the supply chain. Winners of the awards are decided by vote of the VICS Board of Directors, which include many of the retail and consumer products goods industries’ top leaders.

“All of this year’s finalists are excellent examples of what makes our industry so efficient and effective. We appreciate all of the companies that submitted nominations and look forward to learning about the winners at our annual awards dinner,” said Joe Andraski, President and CEO of VICS.

“We are proud to be named a finalist in the Best Third-Party Technology Provider category, but we are even more pleased that our customers have also been honored at least in part as a result of using our technology. These nominations are a clear validation that our solutions help trading partners collaborate in new and innovate ways for the betterment of the extended retail and consumer products network,” said Marc Dietz, vice president of marketing at DemandTec.

About VICS.

The Voluntary Interindustry Commerce Solutions (VICS) Association has enabled companies in the retail and consumer-focused industries to eliminate billions of dollars of waste and delay. By creating voluntary guidelines, often referred to as “standards,” VICS has created new best practices that ultimately lead to lower costs and better availability of products for consumers. VICS’ volunteer members improve the flow of products and information throughout retailing and the consumer-focused industries that supply retail. The Association provides leadership and an environment in which executives can make a difference in their industry, their company performance – and their personal commitment to make the world work a little bit better. VICS’ members help define the next best practices in the industries and thus anticipate and optimize business processes and costs. Additional information can be found at www.vics.org.

About DemandTec

DemandTec (NASDAQ: DMAN) enables retailers and consumer products companies to optimize merchandising and marketing decisions, individually or collaboratively, to achieve their sales volume, revenue, and profitability objectives. DemandTec software services utilize DemandTec’s science-based software platform to model and understand consumer behavior. DemandTec customers include more than 195 leading retail and consumer products manufacturers such as ACE Hardware, Advance Auto Parts, Belk, Best Buy, Bon-Ton Stores, Circle K Stores, ConAgra Foods, Delhaize America, General Mills, Giant-Carlisle, H-E-B Grocery Co, Hormel Foods, Monoprix, PETCO, Safeway, Sara Lee, Spartan Stores, Toys “R” Us and WH Smith. Connected via the DemandTec TradePoint Network(TM), DemandTec customers have collaborated online with nearly 2.2 million trade deals. For more information, please visit www.demandtec.com.

DemandTec Safe Harbor

This press release contains forward-looking statements regarding DemandTec’s expectations, hopes, plans, intentions or strategies, including statements about the benefits of DemandTec’s solutions. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they do not fully materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties include those described in DemandTec’s documents filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements in this press release are based on information available to DemandTec as of the date hereof, and DemandTec assumes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements.

Media Contact:
Mitch Kristofferson, DemandTec, Inc.
(650) 226-4630
mitch.kristofferson@demandtec.com

DemandTec Investor Contact:
Tim Shanahan, DemandTec, Inc.
(650) 226-4603
tim.shanahan@demandtec.com

DemandTec and the DemandTec logo are registered trademarks of DemandTec, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

SOURCE DemandTec, Inc.

Tax Resolution Services, Co., CEO Honored with Prestigious National Recognition: Top Tax Advisor to Know During Recession
May 31st, 2009 by TopDollar

Tax Resolution Services, Co., CEO Honored with Prestigious National Recognition: Top Tax Advisor to Know During Recession

Nation’s leading tax expert Michael Rozbruch has saved clients with IRS problems in excess of $40 million and is featured in CPA Magazine’s profile of top CPAs in the nation.

ENCINO, Calif., May 27 /PRNewswire/ — Tax Resolution Services, Co., founder and CEO Michael Rozbruch has been named one of the Top 40 Tax Advisors to Know During a Recession in the April/May 2009 issue of CPA Magazine. According to the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy, there are more than 646,520 CPAs in the nation. CPA Magazine invited every state society and national association of CPAs and accountants to nominate candidates.

Rozbruch’s company provides affordable solutions to people seeking income tax relief and has saved clients in excess of $40 million since 1998. He has saved many of his clients up to 85% of their outstanding tax bill.

CPA Magazine asked their elite selection of influential CPAs for their best tax advice for clients during an economic downturn. Rozbruch advises clients with tax troubles in this recession to perform financial planning services in reverse.

“Resolving tax debt involves strategizing and re-positioning your finances to ensure as much success as possible in obtaining a tax debt settlement like an Offer in Compromise or a long-term IRS payment plan,” said Rozbruch, the nation’s leading tax negotiation and mediation expert. “An experienced tax professional can also place your account in ‘Currently Not Collectible’ so that you won’t be placed under collection.”

According to Rozbruch, if you owe a substantial amount to the IRS that you cannot afford to pay, you may be eligible for various tax breaks that the IRS is offering during these challenging economic times.

“The recession offers unprecedented opportunity for settling your back taxes and gaining a new lease on your financial life,” Rozbruch said.

Tax Resolution Services is dedicated to providing affordable solutions to businesses and individuals who find themselves in trouble with the IRS. Their team of expert tax attorneys, enrolled agents and CPAs has a success rate of 90% – second to none in the industry – and an Offer in Compromise Settlement Rate of $0.13 on the dollar. For more information or to receive a FREE tax relief consultation, visit www.taxresolution.com or call 866-IRS-PROBLEMS.

Contact: Debbie Edwards
Phone: 818-201-3326
Email: Debbie@taxresolution.com

Available Topic Expert(s): For information on the listed expert(s), click appropriate link.

Michael Rozbruch

https://profnet.prnewswire.com/Subscriber/ExpertProfile.aspx?ei=80818

SOURCE Tax Resolution Services, Co.

Tax Resolution Services, Co., CEO Honored with Prestigious National Recognition: Top Tax Advisor to Know During Recession
May 31st, 2009 by TopDollar

Tax Resolution Services, Co., CEO Honored with Prestigious National Recognition: Top Tax Advisor to Know During Recession

Nation’s leading tax expert Michael Rozbruch has saved clients with IRS problems in excess of $40 million and is featured in CPA Magazine’s profile of top CPAs in the nation.

ENCINO, Calif., May 27 /PRNewswire/ — Tax Resolution Services, Co., founder and CEO Michael Rozbruch has been named one of the Top 40 Tax Advisors to Know During a Recession in the April/May 2009 issue of CPA Magazine. According to the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy, there are more than 646,520 CPAs in the nation. CPA Magazine invited every state society and national association of CPAs and accountants to nominate candidates.

Rozbruch’s company provides affordable solutions to people seeking income tax relief and has saved clients in excess of $40 million since 1998. He has saved many of his clients up to 85% of their outstanding tax bill.

CPA Magazine asked their elite selection of influential CPAs for their best tax advice for clients during an economic downturn. Rozbruch advises clients with tax troubles in this recession to perform financial planning services in reverse.

“Resolving tax debt involves strategizing and re-positioning your finances to ensure as much success as possible in obtaining a tax debt settlement like an Offer in Compromise or a long-term IRS payment plan,” said Rozbruch, the nation’s leading tax negotiation and mediation expert. “An experienced tax professional can also place your account in ‘Currently Not Collectible’ so that you won’t be placed under collection.”

According to Rozbruch, if you owe a substantial amount to the IRS that you cannot afford to pay, you may be eligible for various tax breaks that the IRS is offering during these challenging economic times.

“The recession offers unprecedented opportunity for settling your back taxes and gaining a new lease on your financial life,” Rozbruch said.

Tax Resolution Services is dedicated to providing affordable solutions to businesses and individuals who find themselves in trouble with the IRS. Their team of expert tax attorneys, enrolled agents and CPAs has a success rate of 90% – second to none in the industry – and an Offer in Compromise Settlement Rate of $0.13 on the dollar. For more information or to receive a FREE tax relief consultation, visit www.taxresolution.com or call 866-IRS-PROBLEMS.

Contact: Debbie Edwards
Phone: 818-201-3326
Email: Debbie@taxresolution.com

Available Topic Expert(s): For information on the listed expert(s), click appropriate link.

Michael Rozbruch

https://profnet.prnewswire.com/Subscriber/ExpertProfile.aspx?ei=80818

SOURCE Tax Resolution Services, Co.

DaVita Announces New Corporate Headquarters in Denver, Colorado
May 31st, 2009 by TopDollar

DaVita Announces New Corporate Headquarters in Denver, Colorado

DaVita, Inc. company logo. (PRNewsFoto)

TORRANCE, CA USA

Central Operations of FORTUNE 500 Company to Be Located in Denver Metropolitan Area

DENVER, May 27 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — DaVita Inc. (NYSE: DVA), a leading provider of kidney care services for those diagnosed with chronic kidney disease (CKD), today announced the home of its corporate headquarters will be located in Colorado. The announcement was made during a press conference on the Galleria of the Denver Performing Arts Complex by DaVita Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Kent Thiry, who was joined by Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper.

(Logo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20020729/DAVITALOGO)

Thiry plans to move to the Denver area along with several other senior executives, but relocation efforts are not currently planned for teammates working in the current El Segundo, California headquarters or elsewhere around the company.

Since DaVita started in 1999, it has grown to become a FORTUNE 500(R) company with nearly $6 billion in annual revenues and clinical outcomes widely and consistently recognized as the best or among the best in the kidney care industry. The company operates more than 1,400 outpatient dialysis centers and acute units in more than 700 hospitals in 43 states and the District of Columbia. DaVita – which is Italian for “giving life” – currently has more than 32,000 teammates around the nation and serves more than 114,000 patients with life-saving kidney care treatment. In fact, nearly one-in-three dialysis patients in the United States is a DaVita patient.

“We’re very pleased to announce our search is over and we’ve selected the Denver area to make our home,” said Kent Thiry, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of DaVita. “I want to thank Governor Ritter, Mayor Hickenlooper and their staffs for making such a tremendous effort in helping us choose Colorado.”

The decision to select the Denver area for DaVita’s corporate headquarters was based on four critical factors:

1. The city’s geographic location is ideal for a nationwide company with facilities and operations spread across nearly every state in the country;
2. The relative costs in the area are less expensive for families and companies alike;
3. Denver is widely considered to be a highly desirable place to live and work; and
4. DaVita’s significant existing presence in the region provides a solid foundation upon which the company can continue to grow.

The company expects to see millions of dollars in savings over time as a result of the change.

“DaVita’s decision to move its headquarters is a great coup for metro Denver and the state of Colorado,” said Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper. “DaVita is one of the biggest and the best in its industry. The company’s decision reaffirms what we know is true about our community – that Denver is one of the best places in the nation to work and play. We are proud DaVita chose to call Colorado home.”

“While Colorado families and businesses continue to struggle, we are clearly seeing encouraging signs of economic activity – and DaVita’s decision to move its headquarters to Colorado tops the list,” said Governor Bill Ritter. “Colorado’s business-friendly climate and my administration’s strategy to create new jobs, help businesses survive the downturn, and develop a highly skilled 21st century labor pool are positioning Colorado for a strong and sustainable recovery. On behalf of people throughout the state, we heartily welcome DaVita’s Colorado expansion and we congratulate Mayor Hickenlooper and all those who helped make these new jobs a reality.”

As part of DaVita’s extensive network of outpatient facilities and acute units, DaVita has nearly 30 outpatient facilities statewide and a total of nearly 800 employees serving approximately 2,000 kidney care patients around the state.

DaVita(R) is a registered trademark of DaVita Inc. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

About DaVita Inc.

DaVita Inc., a FORTUNE 500(R) company, is a leading provider of kidney care in the United States, providing dialysis services and education for patients with chronic kidney failure and end stage renal disease. Recognized as the only FORTUNE 500 company on WorldBlu’s annual list of “Most Democratic Work Places,” DaVita manages more than 1,400 outpatient facilities and acute units in more than 700 hospitals located in 43 states and the District of Columbia, serving approximately 114,000 patients – nearly one-in-three of all dialysis patients in the United States. As part of DaVita’s commitment to building a healthy, caring community, DaVita develops, participates in and donates to numerous programs dedicated to transforming communities and creating positive, sustainable change for children, families and our environment. For more information about DaVita, its kidney education materials and its community programs, please visit www.davita.com.

SOURCE DaVita Inc.

»  Substance: WordPress   »  Style: Ahren Ahimsa